Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

An investigation of the processes of interdisciplinary creative collaboration: the case of music technology students working within the performing arts

Dobson, Elizabeth (2012) An investigation of the processes of interdisciplinary creative collaboration: the case of music technology students working within the performing arts. Doctoral thesis, Open University.

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (4MB)


This thesis addresses a gap in research on collaborative creativity. Prior research has investigated how groups of professionals, young people and children work together to co-create work, but the distinctive contribution of this thesis is a socioculturally framed understanding of undergraduates’ interdisciplinary practices over an extended period.

Guided by a socioculturally framed theory of creativity, this thesis observed 4 students creating a 10 minute performance piece, and presents a longitudinal analysis of the co-creation process which occurred through a total of 28 meetings recorded over the course of a twelve-week term (24 hours of recordings in total). Specific episodes were selected from the full set of recordings, constituting 2 hours of recordings for in-depth analysis. Sociocultural discourse analysis was used to examine how social and cultural contexts constituted an ecology of undergraduate practice in interdisciplinary creative collaboration. Offering a new methodology, this discursive approach for studying context (Arvaja, 2008) was combined with interaction analysis (Kumpulainen & Wray, 2002; Scott, Mortimer & Aguiar, 2006) to analyse how moment-by-moment creative developments and contexts were resourced and constituted through dialogue, artifacts and physical settings.

With implications for theory and practice, the analysis showed how the students’ collaborative contexts were constituted through dialogue, and how their emerging co- creative practice was mediated through multiple social and physical settings. It further evidenced how common knowledge was constructed through the process of collaboration, the value of peer feedback for fostering confidence, and students’ need for ‘silent witnessing’; for space to reflect and contribute to a long-term cumulative conversation.
The thesis also discusses how resourceful the students were, in terms of negotiating unfamiliar and unpredictable co-creating activities. Evidence is provided for the collaborative value of creating and appropriating new tools to develop common knowledge, and for the significance of imagination as a psychological resource for building common knowledge about hypothetical future activities, showing how technology-mediated co-creating can be seen as a complex interactional accomplishment.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Uncontrolled Keywords: Sociocultural Theory, creativity, co-creativity, education, music technology, collaboration, social psychology, performing arts
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
L Education > LF Individual institutions (Europe)
M Music and Books on Music > M Music
M Music and Books on Music > MT Musical instruction and study
Schools: School of Music, Humanities and Media
Related URLs:
References: Agar, M. (1994) Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow. Alix, C., Dobson, E., & Wilsmore, R. (2010). Collaborative Art Practices in HE: Mapping and Developing Pedagogical Models. (Higher Education Academy). Retrieved January, 2012, from the HEA website: Amabile, T.M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013. Amabile, T. M. (1983a). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag. Amabile, T.M. (1983b). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45, 375-377. Amabile, T.M. (1993). What does a Theory of Creativity Require. Psychological Inquiry. 4(3), 179-237. Amabile, T.M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update To the Social Psychology of Creativity. Oxford:Westview Press. Amabile, T., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P.W., Marsh, M., & Kramer, S.J. (2001). Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-professional collaboration. Academy of Management Journal. 44, 418-435. Arvaja, M. (2007). Contextual resources in meaning negotiations of a student pair in a web-based history project. International Journal of Educational Research. 46, 215–228. Arvaja, M,. (2008) Discursive Approach for Studying Contexts in Students’ Collaborative Activity. Paper presented at the International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 23.28.6. Bailey, A., & Clarke, M,. (2009) Analytical Representations of Creative Processes in Michael Finnissy’s Second String Quartet. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies. 2(1&2) p139-157. Baker, M., Hansen, T., Joiner, R., & Traum, D. (1999). The Role of Grounding in Collaborative Learning Tasks. in P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. (pp.31-63). Amsterdam: Elsevier Banberger, J. and Dissessa, A. (2003) Music as embodied mathematics: a study of mutually informing affinity. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning. 8, 123-160. Barnes, D. (1992) From Communication to Curriculum, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Barnes, D. (2008). Exploratory Talk for Learning. in N. Mercer and S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploring Talk in School: Inspired by the Work of Douglas Barnes. (pp. 1-15). London: Sage Publications. Barrett, M. (2006). Creative Collaboration an eminence study of teaching and learning in music composition. Psychology of Music. 34(2), 195-218. Bjelic, D. & Lynch, M., (1992). The work of a (Scientific) Demonstration: respectifying Newton’s and Goethe’s theories of prismatic color. In Graham Watson, R.M. Seiler. (Eds.), Text in Context: Contributions to Ethnomethodology. (pp. 52-78). London: Sage. Boden, M., (1994). What is Creativity. In M. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of Creativity. (pp.75 – 118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Bober, M.J. & Dennen, V.P. (2001). Intersubjectivity: Facilitating Knowledge Construction in Online Environments Online. Learning Design. 38(4), 241-250. Boden, M. (1995, June 4). Computers and Unpredictability. Constructs of the mind. Retrieved January, 2012 from Stanford Electronic Humanities Review, 4(2). Boehm, C. (2007). The discipline that never was: current developments in music technology in higher education in Britain. Journal of Music, Technology and Education. 1(1), 7-21. Bourner, J., Hughes, M. & Bourner, T. (2001). First year undergraduate experiences of group project work. Assessment and evaluation in HE. 26(1), 19-39. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Bruner, J. (1962). Introduction L. Vygotsky, Thought and Language. Boston, Mass Bruner, J. (1975). From Communication to Language – a Psychological Perspective. Cognition, 3(3) 255-287. Burnard, P. & Younker, B. A. (2008). Investigating children’s musical interactions within the activities systems of group composing and arranging: An application of Engeström’s Activity Theory. International Journal of Educational Research. 4, 60-74. British Educational Research Association (2004) Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London: BERA Bryan, C. (2004). Assessing the Creative Work of Groups in D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives. (pp. 52-64). London: Free Association Books. Bryan, C., & Green, D. (2002, September, 4-6). How Guided Reflective Practice can Enhance Group Work in the Performing and Creative Arts. Paper presented at the 2002 conference Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice – 10 years on. 316–325, retrieved from Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development. Oxford Brookes University Byrne, C., & Sheridan, M. (2002). Ebb and Flow of Assessment in Music. British Journal of Music Education. 19(2), 135-143. Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou: the life of dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Chettiparamb, A., (2007). Interdisciplinarity: a literature review. Southampton, U.K.: University of Southampton HEA resources Cheyne, J. A., & Tarulli, D., (2005). Dialogue, Difference and Choice in the Zone of Proximal Development in H Daniels (Ed.), An Introduction to Vygotsky. (pp.122 – 144) London and New York: Routledge. Chi, M. T. H., & Bassok, M. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser. (pp. 251–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Chion, M. (1994). Audio-Vision. New York: Columbia University Press. Clarke, E., Cooke, N., Harrison, B., Thomas, P. (2005). Interpretation and Performance in Bryn Harrison’s être-temps Musicæ Scientiæ. The Journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music, 9(1). 31-74. Claxton, G., & Wells, G. (2002). Introduction: Sociocultural Perspectives on the Future of Education in G Claxton & G Wells (Eds.), Learning for Life in the 21st Century. (pp.1-18). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. Cole, J. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belkap/Harvard University Press. Collins, D. (2005). A Synthesis Process Model of Creative Thinking in Music Composition. Psychology of Music. 33(2), 193-216. Craft, A. (2000). Creativity Across the Primary Curriculum: Framing and Developing Practice. London: Routledge Craft, A. (2003). The Limits to Creativity in Education: Dilemmas for the Educator British. Journal of Educational Studies. 51(2), 113-127. Craft, A. (2011). Creativity and Education Futures: Learning in a Digital Age. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books. Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the Ecology of Collaborative Learning. in R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner & D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking Collaborative Learning. (pp. 161-178). London: Free Association Books. Csikszentmihaly, M. (1992). Flow: The Psychology of Happiness. London: Random House Ltd. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial. Csikszentmihalyi, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, I.S. (1998). Optimal Experiences: Psychological Studies of Flow in Consciousness. New York: CUP. Custodero, L.A. (1998). Observing flow in young children’s music learning General Music Today. 12(1), 21-7. Custodero, L.A. (2002). Seeking Challenging, Finding Skill: Flow Experience and Music Education. Arts Education and Policy Review. 103(3), 3-9. Davidson, C. (2010). Analysis of the taken-for-granted in young children's interactions transcription matters : transcribing talk and interaction to facilitate conversation. Journal of Early Childhood Research. 8(2), 115-131. Davis, E.A. & Miyake, N. (2004). Explorations of Scaffolding in Complex Classroom Systems. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 13(3), 265-272. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of Conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.) (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Amsterdam, NL: Pergamon Dillon, T. (2004). ‘It’s in the mix baby’: Exploring how meaning is created within music technology collaborations in D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary perspectives. (pp.144-157), London: Free Association Books. Dixon, S., & Smart, J. (2002). The Discourse of Assessment. Language and Value in the Assessment of Group Practice in the Performing Arts. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. 1(2), 185-204. Dobson, E. D., Flewitt, R., Littleton, K. & Miell, D. (2011). Studio Based Composers in Collaboration: a Socioculturally Framed Study. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Computer Music Conference. Huddersfield: ICMA. Doise, W. & Mugny, G. (1978). Socio-cognitive Conflict and Structure of Individual and Collective Performances. European Journal of Social Psychology. 8, 181-192. Eaglestone, B.M., Ford, N., Nuhn, R., Moore, A., Brown, G. (2001). Composition systems requirements for creativity: what research methodology? Proceedings of Mosart Workshop on Current Research Directions in Computer Music, Barcelona. 7-16. Edmonds, E.A., Weakley, A., Candy, L., Fell, M., Knott, R. & Pauletto, S., (2005). The studio as a laboratory: Combining creative practice and digital technology research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 63, 452-481. Edwards, D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common Knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. New York: Falmer. Engeström, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics. 43, 960–974. Eysenck, H.J., (1993). Creativity and Personality: Suggestions for a Theory. Psychological Inquiry. 4(3), 147-178. Forman, E.A., & Cazden, C.B. (1985). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: the cognitive value of peer interaction. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives. (pp. 323-347). New York: CUP. Forman, E.A. (1992). Discourse, Intersubjectivity, and the Development of Peer Collaboration: A Vygotskian Approach. In L.T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s Development within Social Context: Vol 2. Metatheoretical, theoretical and methodological issues. (pp. 143-159). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Forman, E. A., & McCormick, D. A. (1995). Discourse Analysis: A Sociocultural Perspective. Remedial and Special Education. 16(3), 150-158. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Fontana Press. Gardner, H. (1994) The Creator’s Patterns in M. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of Creativity. (pp. 143-158). Massachusetts: MIT Press. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Malden, MA: Prentice-Hall Inc. Gee, J. P. (2009) Discourse and sociocultural studies in reading. In: M. Kamil, B. Mosenthal, P. Pearson & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, 3. New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library Gee, J.P., & Green, J. (1998). Discourse Analysis, Learning, and Social Practice: A Methodological Study. Review of Research in Education. 23, 119-169. Green, J., Franquiz, M., & Dixon, C. (1997). The myth of the objective transcript. TESOL Quarterly. 31, 172-176 Ginsborg J., Chaffin R., & Nicholson, G. (2006). Shared Performance Cues in Singing and Conducting: a content analysis of talk during practice. Psychology of Music. 34(2), 167-194. Green, L. (2002). How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education. London & New York: Ashgate Green, L. (2007). Group cooperation, inclusion and disaffected pupils: some responses to informal learning in the music classroom. Presented at the RIME Conference. Exeter, UK, Music Education Research, 10(2) 177-192. Grossen, M. (2008). Methods for Studying Collaborative Creativity: An Original and Adventurous Blend. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 3, 246-249. Gruber, H.E. (1989). The Evolving Systems Approach to Creative Work. New York: Oxford University Press. Gruber, H. E., & Davis, S. N. (1988). Inching Our Way up Mount Olympus: the Evolving-Systems Approach to Creative Thinking. In R Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. (pp. 243-270). Cambridge, New York, Port Chester, Melbourne and Sydney: Cambridge University Press. Gruber, H. E., & Wallace, D. B. (1989). Creative People at Work. New York: OUP Hammersley, M. (1990). What’s Wrong with Ethnography? The Myth of Theoretical Description Sociology. 24(4), 597-615. Hammersley, M. (2010). Reproducing or constructing? Some questions about transcription in social research. Qualitative research. 10(5), 553-569. Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P. (1995) Ethnography: principles in practice London: Routledge Hargreaves, D. (2008). Commentary. International Journal of Educational Research. 47(1), 75-77. Harrison, C. & Pound, L. (1996). Talking music: empowering children as musical communicators. British Journal of Music Education, 13(3) Haythornthwaite, C., Lunsford, K.J.. Bowker, G.C & Bruce, B. (2006). Challenges for research and practice in distributed, interdisciplinary, collaboration. In C. Hine, (Ed.), New Infrastructures for Science Knowledge Production. (pp.143-166). Hershey, PA: Idea Group. Healey, P. & Thiebaut, J. (2007). Sketching Musical Composition. A survey and case study. Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society conference, Nashville, USA, 1079-1084. Hickey, M. (Ed.) (2003). Why and how to teach music composition. Reston, VA: The National Association for Music Education (MENC) Howe, C. (2010). Peer dialogue and cognitive development: a two way relationship? In C. Howe & K. Littleton (Eds.), Educational Dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction. (pp.32-47). Oxon and New York: University of Cambridge. Hutchby, I. & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Malden, MA: Polity Press. Jeffrey, G. (2005). C1-4 The Creative College: building a successful learning culture in the arts. London: Trentham Books Ltd John-Steiner, V. (1997). Notebooks of the Mind: Explorations of Thinking New York: OUP John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative Collaboration. Oxford and New York: OUP John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (2002). The Gift of Confidence: A Vygotskian View of Emotions. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21stcentury: Sociocultural perspectives on the further of education. (pp. 46-58). Oxford: Blackwell. John-Steiner, V. & Meehan, T. (2000). Creativity and Collaboration in Knowledge Construction. In C. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid and Cape Town: Cambridge University Press. John-Steiner, V., & Moran, S. (2003). Creativity in the Making: Vygotsky’s Contemporary Contribution to the Dialectic of Creativity & Development. In K.R.Sawyer, V. John-Steiner, S.Moran, R.J.Stenberg, D.H.Feldman, H.Gardner, J. Nakamura, & M. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Creativity and Development. 61-90. Oxford, New York: OUP John-Steiner, V. & Moran, S. (2004). How collaboration in creative work impacts identity and motivation. In D. Miell & K. Littleton (Eds.), Collaborative Creativity: Contemporary Perspectives. (pp. 11-25). London: Free Association Books Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1996). Conflict Resolution and Peer Mediation Programs in Elementary and Secondary Schools: A Review of the Research. Review of Educational Research. 66(4), 459-506. Johnson-Laird, P. (1988). Freedom and constraint in creativity. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity (pp. 202 -219). Cambridge, New York, Port Chester, Melbourne and Sydney: Cambridge University Press. Jordan, B. & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and Practice. The journal of the learning sciences. 4(1), 39-103. Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective. Creativity Research Journal. 8(4), 311-366. Keefer, M. W., Zeitz, C. M. & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction. 18(1), 53-81.
Depositing User: Elizabeth Dobson
Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2012 15:14
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 20:31


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©