Sexual Deviancy and the Sex Police: An Examination of the Religious, Cultural and Psycho-Legal Antecedents of Perceived Perversion

The perception of what is sexually perverted shifts dependent on who is
talking about it. Even the term ‘perversion’ is controversial. Psychologists
generally refer to non-traditional sexual behaviour as sexual deviation or, in
cases where the specific object of arousal is unusual, as paraphilia. There are
a number of clinically recognised disorders of sexual or paraphiliac function:
fetishism and transvestic fetishism, exhibitionism, voyeurism, chronophilias,
frotteurism, sadomasochism, and ‘others not otherwise specified’ (including
scatologia, necrophilia, partialism, zoophilia, coprophilia, klismaphilia and
urophilia). However, interesting absences from this list are erotophonophilia,
in which sexual arousal can only be achieved by the act of murder as its
corollary, autassassinophilia. This paper discusses the journey that our sexual
attitudes have made through the history of religion and medicine, the laws
surrounding sex and their development from religious and cultural taboos
into prohibitions of illegal sexual behaviour, then draws on those arguments
to make a comparison between ‘victim-less’ and ‘victim-rich’ sexual crimes.