Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Bad Girls Like It Rough (-And Good Girls Don’t?): Representations of BDSM in Buffy the Vampire Slayer

Burr, Vivien (2006) Bad Girls Like It Rough (-And Good Girls Don’t?): Representations of BDSM in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. Phoebe, 18 (1). pp. 45-57. ISSN 1045-0904

[img] HTML
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (100kB)


The difficulties in discussing and validating non-normative sexual choices, particularly those of women, are widely recognised. For example, Vance (1989) challenged the ways in which feminist arguments and campaigns against pornography and so-called ‘perverted’ sexual practices may in fact have undermined women’s attempts to achieve sexual liberation.
It may be argued, therefore, that TV shows that attempt to go some way towards exploring aspects of sexuality that may be seen by society as less desirable deserve our attention. Jowett (2005) adopts postmodernism as a theoretical perspective, and locates popular culture as a site where important aspects of our identities, such as gender and sexuality, may be struggled after and contested. Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997-2003) has never avoided the exploration of uncomfortable issues surrounding relationships, sex and sexuality, and they are evidently the focus of concerns and anxieties for many teens and young adults. As a show targeted primarily at young people, one of its central themes over its seven-year run has been sexual relationships. As a result, it has attracted a good deal of criticism from those who claim it is unsuitable for young people and undermines ‘family values’. The show is widely understood as of hybrid genre, combining elements of sci-fi, horror, soap opera, and teen drama, but its supernatural theme and use of vampires and monsters as narrative devices have been central to its capacity to metaphorically explore sensitive issues that would have been much more difficult to address directly

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright by PHOEBE
Uncontrolled Keywords: BDSM; Buffy the Vampire Slayer; gender; cultural critiques
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Psychological Research
Related URLs:
References: Amy-Chinn, D. (2005) Queering the bitch: Spike, transgression, and erotic empowerment. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8 (3):313-328. Barker, M. & Langdridge, D. (2005). Editorial: The place of S/M in LGBTQ psychology. Lesbian & Gay Psychology Review, 6 (3), pp. 143-146. Beckman, A. (2001) ‘Deconstructing Myths: The Social Construction of “Sadomasochism” Versus “Subjugated Knowledges” of Practitioners of Consensual “SM”’ Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 8 (2): 66-95. Bellafante, G. (1997) Bewitching Teen Heroes. Time 149.18 (May 5th): 82-85. Burr, V. (2003) Ambiguity and sexuality in Buffy the Vampire Slayer: A Sartrean analysis. Sexualities 6 (3). Dworkin, A. (1983) Right-Wing Women. New York: Perigree. Forster, G. (2003) Faith and Plato: You’re nothing! Disgusting, murderous bitch! In J. South (ed) Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Philosophy: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale. Peru, Ill.:Open Court. Heinecken, D. (2003) The Warrior Women of Television: A feminist cultural analysis of the new female body in popular media. New York: Peter Lang. Jowett, L. (2005) Sex and the Slayer: A gender studies primer for the Buffy fan. Middletown, Connecticut: Wesleyan University Press. Langdridge, D. (in press). The time of the sadomasochist: Hunting with(in) the 'tribus'. In S. Seidman, C. Meeks & N. Fischer (Eds.) Handbook of Sexualities. New York: Routledge. Langdridge, D. and Butt, T.W. (2004) A hermeneutic phenomenological investigation of the construction of sadomasochistic identities. Sexualities 7 (1) 31-53. Langdridge, D. and Butt, T.W. (2005) The erotic construction of power exchange. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 18 (1) 65-73. McRobbie, A. (1994) Postmodernism and Popular Culture. London: Routledge. Morgan, R. (1974) Theory and Practice: Pornography and rape. In R. Morgan ‘Going Too Far: The personal chronicle of a feminist.’ New York: Random House. Plummer, K. (1995). Telling Sexual Stories: Power, Change and Social Worlds. London: Routledge Rubin, G (1989) Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. Vance (ed) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring female sexuality. London: Pandora. pp267-319. Taylor, G. W. (1997). The Discursive Construction and Regulation of Dissident Sexualities: The Case of SM, in J. M. Ussher (1997) Body Talk: The Material and Discursive Regulation of Sexuality, Madness and Reproduction. London: Routledge. Taylor, G. W. and Ussher, J. (2001). Making Sense of S&M: A Discourse Analytic Account. Sexualities, 4 (3): 293-314. Vance, C. (ed.) (1989) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring female sexuality. London: Pandora. Webster, P. (1989) The forbidden eroticism and taboo. In C. Vance (ed) Pleasure and Danger: Exploring female sexuality. London: Pandora. pp385-398
Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 17 Apr 2008 11:39
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 10:38


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©