Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Effect of machining parameters on surface roughness in Al 2618 alloy subject to multi-axis machining process using ball nose cutting tools

Tabriz, Md Shams E, Barrans, Simon and Bills, Paul J. (2017) Effect of machining parameters on surface roughness in Al 2618 alloy subject to multi-axis machining process using ball nose cutting tools. In: ICMAE 2017: 8th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, 22-25 July 2017, Prague, Czech Republic.

PDF - Accepted Version
Download (835kB) | Preview


Recently multi-axis machining technology has improved significantly. It has become a widely accepted method of manufacturing components with complex, free form surfaces. Solid billet materials with negligible internal defects are used in this process. This provides increased durability and fatigue life over equivalent cast components. However, multi-axis machining using ball nose cutting tools leaves cusps as machining marks. The surface quality within the cusps can have a significant influence on the fatigue life and durability of a component. The main objective of this paper is to report the experimental investigation of the effect of different cutting parameters on surface roughness of Al 2618 alloy.
This paper reports on an experimental investigation of the effect of different cutting parameters on surface roughness of Al 2618 alloy. A full factorial experimental analysis using four different levels of spindle speed, feed-rate and cutting-tool approach angle was carried out. The results indicate that higher spindle speed, lower feed rate and a cutting tool approach angle of approximately 25° generates a better surface finish.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Additional Information: © 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Subjects: T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
T Technology > TN Mining engineering. Metallurgy
T Technology > TS Manufactures
Schools: School of Computing and Engineering
School of Computing and Engineering > Turbocharger Research Institute
Related URLs:
References: [1] Vickers, G.W. and Quan, K.W., Ball-Mills Versus End-Mills for Curvesd Surface Machining. Journal of Engineering Industry, 1989. 111: p. 22-26. [2] Squires, J. Understanding stepover and cusp height. 2013 [cited 2016 1 November]; Available from: [3] Bayoumi, M.R. and Abdellatif, A.K., Effect of Surface Finish on Fatigue Strength. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1995. 51(5): p. 861-870. [4] Javidi, A., Rieger, U., and Eichlseder, W., The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life. International Journal of Fatigue, 2008. 30: p. 2050-2055. [5] Sasahara, H., The effect on fatigue life of residual stress and surface hardness resulting from different cutting conditions of 0.45%C steel. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2005. 45: p. 131-136. [6] Novovic, D., Dewes, R.C., Aspinwall, D.K., Voice, W., and Bowen, P., The effect of machined topography and integrity on fatigue life. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2004. 44: p. 125-134. [7] Schmid, S.R., Hamrock, B.J., and Jacobson, B.O., Fundamentals of Machine Elements. 3rd ed. 2014, Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press. [8] Shigley, J.E. and Mitchell, L.D., Machinical Engineering Design. 4th ed. 1983, London: McGraw Hill. [9] Kilickap, E., Cakir, O., Aksoy, M., and Inan, A., Study of tool wear and surface roughness in machining of homogenised SiC-p reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite. journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2005. 164-165: p. 862-687. [10] Bhushan, R.K., Kumar, S., and Das, S., Effect of machining parameters on surface roughness and tool wear for 7075 Al alloy SiC composite. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology, 2010. 50: p. 459-469. [11] Dwivedi, S.P., Kumar, S., and Kumar, A., Effect of turning parameters on surface roughness of A356/5% SiC composite produced by electromagnetic stir casting. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2012. 26(12): p. 3973-3979. [12] Patel, P.R. and Patel, V.A., Effect of machining parameters on Surface roughness and Power consumption for 6063 Al alloy TiC Composites (MMCs). International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2012. 2(4). [13] Kumar, R. and Chauhan, S., Study on surface roughness measurement for turning of Al 7075/10/SiCp and Al 7075 hybrid composites by using response surface methodology (RSM) and artificial neural networking (ANN). Measurement, 2015. 65: p. 166-180. [14] Karabulut, S. and Karakoc, H., Investigation of surface roughness in the milling of Al7075 and open-cell SiC foam composite and optimization of machining parameters. Neural Computing and Application, 2015. 28: p. 313-327. [15] Pathak, B.N., Sahoo, K.L., and Mishra, M., Effect of Machining Parameters on Cutting Forces and Surface Roughness in Al-(1-2) Fe-1V-1Si Alloys. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 2013. 28: p. 463-469. [16] Wojciechowski, S., Twardowski, P., and Wieczorowski, M., Surface Texture Analysis after Ball end Milling with Various Surface Inclination of Hardened Steel. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 2014. 21(1): p. 145-156. [17] Schroettner, H., Schmied, M., and Scherer, S., Comparison of 3D Surface Reconstruction Data from Certified Depth Standards Obtained by SEM and an Infinite Focus Measurement Machine (IFM). Microchimica Acta, 2006. 155(1): p. 279-284. [18] Whitehouse, D.J., Surfaces and Their Measurement. 2002, London: Hermes penton Science. [19] Mitutoyo, Quick Guide to Surface Roughness Measurement, in Reference Guide for Laborotory and Workshop, M.A. Corporation, Editor. 2016, Mitutoyo America Corporation: USA.
Depositing User: Md Shams E Tabriz
Date Deposited: 26 May 2017 15:34
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 15:58


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©