Splitting hairs? Is it discrimination? James Marson & Katy Ferris examine the different approaches of the court to mistreatment on grounds of nationality & immigration status

Marson, James and Ferris, Katy (2016) Splitting hairs? Is it discrimination? James Marson & Katy Ferris examine the different approaches of the court to mistreatment on grounds of nationality & immigration status. New Law Journal, 166 (7710). p. 10. ISSN 0306-6479

Preview

PDF - Published Version Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

In Brief: In Taiwo v Olaigbe and another: Onu v Akwiwu and another the Supreme Court had to decide whether the appellants suffered mistreatment on the basis of their nationality (protected by s13(1) of the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010)) or due to their vulnerable immigration status (not protected).
The case of Taiwo v Olaigbe and another: Onu v Akwiwu and another [2016] UKSC 31, [2016] All ER (D) 134 (Jun) involved the mistreatment of migrant domestic workers by their employers and whether such action amounted to direct or indirect race discrimination.

Item Type:	Article
Additional Information:	Reproduced by permission of © LexisNexis
Subjects:	H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races K Law > K Law (General)
Schools:	Huddersfield Business School
Related URLs:	Author Publisher
Depositing User:	Sara Taylor
Date Deposited:	02 Aug 2016 13:50
Last Modified:	28 Aug 2021 16:52
URI:	https://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/29127

Downloads

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item