Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

The potential of ontology for safety and risk analysis

Van Gulijk, Coen, Hughes, Peter and Figueres-Esteban, Miguel (2016) The potential of ontology for safety and risk analysis. In: Risk, Reliability and Safety: Innovating Theory and Practice: Proceedings of ESREL 2016. CRC Press. ISBN 9781138029972

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (471kB)


Ontology is one of the enablers of the Big Data Risk Analysis project (BDRA). Ontology is the systematic classification of domain knowledge that supports the use of different databases in a meaningful way. This pa-per describes the background of ontologies and use cases within the BDRA research programme. Primarily, they are useful for search engines, text analysis and data-linkage and re-use. Also, the analysis of ontologies offers a shimmer into a new way of working in science itself.

Item Type: Book Chapter
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD61 Risk Management
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
T Technology > TF Railroad engineering and operation
Schools: School of Computing and Engineering
School of Computing and Engineering > Institute of Railway Research
Related URLs:
References: Assali, A.A., Lenne, D. & Debray, B., 2008. Ontology devel-opment for industrial risk analysis. In information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applica-tions, 2008. ICTTA 2008. 3rd International Conference on. IEEE: 1–5. Bateman, J. a. et al., 2010. A linguistic ontology of space for natural language processing. Artificial Intelligence, 17: 1027–1071. Bierwisch, M. & Schreuder, R., 1992. From concepts to lexical items. Cognition, 42: 23–60. Bienvenu, M. et al., 2014. Ontology-based data access: A study through disjunctive datalog, csp, and mmsnp. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 39(4): 33.1–33.4. Brewster, C. & O’Hara, K., 2007. Knowledge representation with ontologies: Present challenges-Future possibilities. Int. J. Human Computer Studies 65: 563–568. Delgoshaei, P. & Austin, M., 2012. Software Patterns for Traceability of Requirements to Finite State Machine Be-havior. Procedia Computer Science 8: 214–219. Dahlgren, K., 1995. A linguistic ontology. Int J Human-Computer Studies, 43: 809–818. Hey, T. & Trefethen, A., 2003. The Data Deluge: 809-824. In, Berman, F, Fox, G C and Hey, A J G (eds.) Grid Computing - Making the Global Infrastructure a Reality. New York: Wiley and Sons. Easton, J.M., Davies, J.R. & Roberts, C., 2010. Railway model-ling - The case for ontologies in the rail industry. In KEOD 2010 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development: 257–262. Evermann, J. & Fang, J., 2010. Evaluating ontologies: Towards a cognitive measure of quality. Information Systems 35: 391–403. Figueres-Esteban, M., Hughes, P. & Van Gulijk, C., 2015. Vis-ualising Close Call in railways: a step towards Big Data Risk Analysis. In Fifth International Rail Human Factors Conference: 725–734. London: RSSB. Figueres, M., Hughes, P. & Van Gulijk, C. 2015. The role of data visualization in railway big data risk analysis. In Podofillini et al. (ed): safety and reliability of complex en-gineered systems: Proc. ESREL 2015. 2877 – 2882. Lon-don: Taylor & Francis. Genesereth, M.R. & Nilsson, N.J., 1987. Logical Foundations of Artificial. Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann. Grolemund, G. & Wickham, H., 2014. A Cognitive Interpreta-tion of Data Analysis. International Statistical Review 82(2): 184–204. Guarino, N. et al., 1997. Understanding, building and using on-tologies, Int J Human-Computer Studies 46(2-3) : 293-310. Hoinaru, O., Mariano, G. & Gransart, C., 2013. Ontology for complex railway systems application to ERTMS/ETCS sys-tem. In FM-RAIL-BOK Workshop in SEFM’2013 11th In-ternational Conference on Software Engineering and Formal Methods. Hughes, P., Figueres, M. & Van Gulijk, C. 2015. Learning from text based close call data, In Podofillini et al. (ed): safety and reliability of complex engineered systems: Proc. ESREL 2015. 32 – 38. London: Taylor & Francis. Kitchin, R. 2015. The data revolution, London: SAGE. Lewis, R., 2012. A semantic approach to railway data integra-tion and decision support. Thesis, University of Birming-ham. Noy, N. & McGuinness, D., 2001. Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Development, 32: 1–25. McCarthy, J., 1980. Circumscription – A form of non-monotonic Reasoning. Stanford Artificial Intelligence La-boratory, Computer Science Department Report No. STAN-CS-80-788. Maalel, A. et al., 2012. Toward a knowledge management ap-proach based on an ontology and Case-based Reasoning (CBR): Application to railroad accidents. In 2012 Sixth In-ternational Conference on Research Challenges in Infor-mation Science (RCIS): 1–6. Miller, G. a & Fellbaum, C., 1991. Semantic networks of Eng-lish. Cognition, 41: 197–229. Pavković, N., Tečec-Ribarić, Z. & Sviličić, T., 2012. Tracea-bility Case Study on Rail Vehicle Control Unit Develop-ment Project. In International Design Conference DESIGN: 1- 19. Popping, R., 2000. Computer-Assisted Text Analysis. London, SAGE. Ritter, H. & Kohonen, T., 1989. Self-organizing semantic maps. Biological Cybernetics 61: 241–254. Searle, J.R., 2006. Social Ontology: Some Basic Principles. Papers. Anthropological Theory 6: 12 -27. Smith, B., 1998. Basic concepts of formal ontology. In Formal Ontology in Information Systems: 19–28. Amsterdam: IOS press. Smith, B. & Welty, C., 2001. Ontology: Towards a New Syn-thesis. In Proceedings of the international conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems: 3–9. Tutcher, J., 2014. Ontology-driven data integration for railway asset monitoring applications. In Big Data (Big Data), 2014 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE: 85–95. Umiliacchi, P. et al., 2011. Predictive maintenance of railway subsystems using an Ontology based modelling approach. In The 9th World Conference on Railway Research, WCRR. Van Gulijk, C. 2015. Background of ontology for BDRA, Huddersfield: IRR report 110/124. Van Gulijk, C., Hughes, P. & Figueres, M, 2015. Big data risk analysis for rail safety? In Podofillini et al. (ed): safety and reliability of complex engineered systems: Proc. ESREL 2015. 643 – 650. London: Taylor & Francis. Verstichel, S. et al., 2007. Ontology-driven middleware for next-generation train backbones. Science of Computer Pro-gramming 66: 4–24.
Depositing User: Coen Van Gulijk
Date Deposited: 14 Jun 2016 16:19
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 17:03


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©