Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Health Research Access to Personal Confidential Data in England and Wales: Assessing any gap in public attitude between preferable and acceptable models of consent

Taylor, Mark J. and Taylor, Natasha (2014) Health Research Access to Personal Confidential Data in England and Wales: Assessing any gap in public attitude between preferable and acceptable models of consent. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 10 (15). pp. 1-24. ISSN 2195-7819

[img] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (809kB)


England and Wales are moving toward a model of ‘opt out’ for use of personal confidential data in health research. Existing research does not make clear how acceptable this move is to the public. While people are typically supportive of health research, when asked to describe the ideal level of control there is a marked lack of consensus over the preferred model of consent (e.g. explicit consent, opt out etc.).
This study sought to investigate a relatively unexplored difference between the consent model that people prefer and that which they are willing to accept. It also sought to explore any reasons for such acceptance. A mixed methods approach was used to gather data, incorporating a structured questionnaire and in-depth focus group discussions led by an external facilitator. The sampling strategy was designed to recruit people with different involvement in the NHS but typically with experience of NHS services. Three separate focus groups were carried out over three consecutive days. The central finding is that people are typically willing to accept models of consent other than that which they would prefer. Such acceptance is typically conditional upon a number of factors, including: security and confidentiality, no inappropriate commercialisation or detrimental use, transparency, independent overview, the ability to object to any processing considered to be inappropriate or particularly sensitive. This study suggests that most people would find research use without the possibility of objection to be unacceptable. However, the study also suggests that people who would prefer to be asked explicitly before data were used for purposes beyond direct care may be willing to accept an opt out model of consent if the reasons for not seeking explicit consent are accessible to them and they trust that data is only going to be used under conditions, and with safeguards, that they would consider to be acceptable even if not preferable.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Personal confidential data; Health research; Opt out; Explicit consent; Patient preference; Public attitude
Subjects: K Law > K Law (General)
Schools: Huddersfield Business School
Related URLs:
References: Crow, I, and N Semmens. 2008. Researching Criminology. McGraw-Hill: Maidenhead. Damschroder, LJ, JL Pritts, MA Neblo, RJ Kalrickal, JW Creswell, and RA Hayward. 2007. Patients, privacy and trust: Patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records’. Soc Sci Med 64: 223–235. Grace, J, and MJ Taylor. 2012. Disclosure of confidential patient information and the duty to consult: The role of the health and social care Information Centre. Med Law Rev. first published online March 29, 2013. Hill, EM, EL Turner, R Martin, and JL Donovan. 2013. “Let’s get the best quality research we can”: public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study’. BMC Med Res Methodol 13: 72. House of Commons Health Committee, Patient and Public Involvement in the NHS, (HC 2006-2007, 278-I). Robling, MR, K Hood, H Houston, R Pill, J Fay, and HM Evans. 2004. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study’. J Med Ethics 30: 104–109. Stone, MA, AS Redsell, JT Ling, and AD Hay. 2005. Sharing Patient Data: Competing demands of privacy, trust and research in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 783–789. Whiddett, R, I Hunter, J Englebrecht, and J Handy. 2006. Patient's attitudes towards sharing their health information. Int J Med Informatics 75: 530–541. Willison, DJ, M Swinton, L Schwartz, J Abelson, C Charles, D Northrup, J Cheng, and L Thabane. 2008. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: Insights from a public dialogue’. BMC Med Ethics 9: 18.
Depositing User: Natasha Taylor
Date Deposited: 23 Jun 2015 09:59
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 18:05


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©