Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Are randomised controlled trials really the 'Gold Standard' in restorative justice research

Wilcox, Aidan and Hoyle, Carolyn (2005) Are randomised controlled trials really the 'Gold Standard' in restorative justice research. British Journal of Criminal Justice, 3 (2). pp. 39-49. ISSN 1475-0279

[img] PDF
WilcoxRandomised.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (109kB)

Abstract

The rise of the evidence-based approach has influenced how criminological research is
conducted in Britain. Funding bodies increasingly specify a quantitative research design as
the most appropriate way to determine ‘what works’. Indeed, there is a growing tendency
to regard the randomised control trial (RCT) as the ‘gold standard’ for such studies. In this
article, restorative justice research is used as an example of the pitfalls of relying on a
purely quantitative paradigm. By ignoring issues of programme integrity and context,
RCTs often produce contradictory or inconclusive results. The article concludes that the
artificial divide often imposed on researchers between qualitative and empirical
approaches is unhelpful, and that research into restorative justice (and other areas) would
gain from the integration of an in-depth, qualitative component within the experimental
approach.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: UoA 40 (Social Work and Social Policy and Administration) © British Journal of Community Justice Sheffield Hallam University
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
Related URLs:
References:

Becker, H. (1983) Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
Bottomley, K. (2002) ‘Editor’s Tailpiece’, British Society of Criminology Newsletter 46: 12.
Braithwaite, J. (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., Blackburn, B., Silverman, B., Schroeder, B., Reitman, D., and Ambroz,
A. (1981) ‘A Method for Assessing the Quality of a Randomized Control Trial’, Controlled
Clinical Trials 2: 31-49.
Cherney, A. (2002) ‘Beyond Technicism: Broadening the ‘What Works’ Paradigm in Crime
Prevention’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 4(3): 49-59.
Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979) Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field
Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Crawford, A. (2001) ‘Joined up but Fragmented: Contradiction, Ambiguity and Ambivalence at the
Heart of New Labour's ‘Third Way’ ’, in R. Matthews and J. Pitts (eds.) Crime, Disorder and
Community Safety: A New Agenda? London: Routledge.
Hood, R. (2002) ‘Criminology and Penal Policy: The Vital Role of Empirical Research’ in A.
Bottoms and M. Tonry (eds.) Ideology, Crime and Criminal Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
Hoyle, C., Young, R. and Hill, R. (2002) Proceed with Caution: An Evaluation of the Thames Valley
Police Initiative in Restorative Cautioning. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Killias, M., Aebi, M. and Ribeaud, D. (2000) ‘Does Community Service Rehabilitate better than
Short term Imprisonment? Results of a Controlled Experiment’, The Howard Journal, 39(1):
40-57.
Lösel, F. (2001) ‘Evaluating the Effectiveness of Correctional Programs: Bridging the Gap Between
Research and Practice’, in G. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington and A. W. Leschied (eds.) Offender
Rehabilitation in Practice. London: Wiley and Sons.
Marshall, T. and Merry, S. (1990) Crime and Accountability: Victim/Offender Mediation in Practice.
London: HMSO.
Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What Works? - Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’, The Public
Interest 10: 22-54.
McGuire, J. and Priestley, P. (1985) Offending Behaviour: Skills and Stratagems for Going Straight.
London: Batsford.
Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1994) ‘What Works in Evaluation Research?’, British Journal of
Criminology 34(3): 291-306.
Plewis, I. (2000) ‘Educational Inequalities and Education Action Zones’, in C. Pantazis and D.
Gordon (eds.) Tackling Inequalities: Where We Are Now and What Can be Done. Bristol: Policy
Press.
Richards, D. and Smith, M. J. (2002) Governance and Public Policy in the United Kingdom. Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J. and Altman, D. G. (1995) ‘Empirical Evidence of Bias:
Dimensions of Methodological Quality Associated with Estimates of Treatment Effects in
Controlled Trials’, Journal of the American Medical Association 273: 408-412.
Sebba, L. (2001) ‘On the Relationship Between Criminological Research and Policy: The Case of
Victims’, Criminal Justice 1(1): 27-58.
Sherman, L. and Strang, H. (2003) ‘Verdicts or Inventions? Interpreting Results from Randomized
Controlled Experiments in Criminology’, American Behavioral Scientist 47(5): 575-607.
Solesbury, W. (2001) Evidence Based Policy: Whence it Came and Where it’s Going. Working Paper 1.
London: ERSC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice. Available online at:
http://www.evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp1.pdf (12 January 2004).Strang, H., Barnes, G., Braithwaite J. and Sherman L. W. (1999) Experiments in Restorative Policing:
A Progress Report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE). Available online at:
http://www.aic.gov.au/rjustice (12 January 2004).
Strang, H. and Sherman, L. (2003) Effects of Face-to-Face Restorative Justice on Repeat Offending and
Victim Satisfaction: A Systematic Review for the Campbell Collaboration. (May 16, 2003).
Tilley, N. (2001) ‘Evaluation and Evidence-led Crime Reduction Policy and Practice’, in R.
Matthews and J. Pitts (eds.) Crime, Disorder and Community Safety: A New Agenda. London:
Routledge.
Tyler, T. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Vennard, J., Sugg, D. and Hedderman, C. (1997) Changing Offenders’ Attitudes and Behaviour: What
Works. Home Office Research Study 171. London: Home Office.
Wilcox, A. (2003) ‘Evidence-based Youth Justice? Some Valuable Lessons from an Evaluation for
the Youth Justice Board’, Youth Justice 3(1):19-33.
Wilcox, A. with Hoyle, C. (2002) Final Report for the Youth Justice Board on the National Evaluation of
Restorative Justice Projects. Unpublished report. London: Youth Justice Board.
Young, R. and Hoyle, C. (1999) Restorative Cautioning: Strengthening Communities in the Thames
Valley. Confidential Interim study. Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research, University of
Oxford.
Young, R. and Hoyle, C. (2000) ‘Examining the Guts of Restorative Justice’, Criminal Justice Matters
40: 33-4.
Young, R. (2001) ‘Just Cops doing Shameful Business’, in A. Morris and G. Maxwell (eds.)
Restorative Justice for Juveniles. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 13 Sep 2007
Last Modified: 28 Jul 2010 18:21
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/398

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©