Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Are randomised controlled trials really the 'Gold Standard' in restorative justice research

Wilcox, Aidan and Hoyle, Carolyn (2005) Are randomised controlled trials really the 'Gold Standard' in restorative justice research. British Journal of Criminal Justice, 3 (2). pp. 39-49. ISSN 1475-0279

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (107kB)

    Abstract

    The rise of the evidence-based approach has influenced how criminological research is
    conducted in Britain. Funding bodies increasingly specify a quantitative research design as
    the most appropriate way to determine ‘what works’. Indeed, there is a growing tendency
    to regard the randomised control trial (RCT) as the ‘gold standard’ for such studies. In this
    article, restorative justice research is used as an example of the pitfalls of relying on a
    purely quantitative paradigm. By ignoring issues of programme integrity and context,
    RCTs often produce contradictory or inconclusive results. The article concludes that the
    artificial divide often imposed on researchers between qualitative and empirical
    approaches is unhelpful, and that research into restorative justice (and other areas) would
    gain from the integration of an in-depth, qualitative component within the experimental
    approach.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: UoA 40 (Social Work and Social Policy and Administration) © British Journal of Community Justice Sheffield Hallam University
    Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
    H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    Related URLs:
    References:

    Becker, H. (1983) Outsiders. New York: Free Press.
    Bottomley, K. (2002) ‘Editor’s Tailpiece’, British Society of Criminology Newsletter 46: 12.
    Braithwaite, J. (2002) Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Chalmers, T. C., Smith, H., Blackburn, B., Silverman, B., Schroeder, B., Reitman, D., and Ambroz,
    A. (1981) ‘A Method for Assessing the Quality of a Randomized Control Trial’, Controlled
    Clinical Trials 2: 31-49.
    Cherney, A. (2002) ‘Beyond Technicism: Broadening the ‘What Works’ Paradigm in Crime
    Prevention’, Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal 4(3): 49-59.
    Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (1979) Quasi-experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field
    Settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Crawford, A. (2001) ‘Joined up but Fragmented: Contradiction, Ambiguity and Ambivalence at the
    Heart of New Labour's ‘Third Way’ ’, in R. Matthews and J. Pitts (eds.) Crime, Disorder and
    Community Safety: A New Agenda? London: Routledge.
    Hood, R. (2002) ‘Criminology and Penal Policy: The Vital Role of Empirical Research’ in A.
    Bottoms and M. Tonry (eds.) Ideology, Crime and Criminal Justice. Cullompton: Willan.
    Hoyle, C., Young, R. and Hill, R. (2002) Proceed with Caution: An Evaluation of the Thames Valley
    Police Initiative in Restorative Cautioning. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
    Killias, M., Aebi, M. and Ribeaud, D. (2000) ‘Does Community Service Rehabilitate better than
    Short term Imprisonment? Results of a Controlled Experiment’, The Howard Journal, 39(1):
    40-57.
    Lösel, F. (2001) ‘Evaluating the Effectiveness of Correctional Programs: Bridging the Gap Between
    Research and Practice’, in G. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington and A. W. Leschied (eds.) Offender
    Rehabilitation in Practice. London: Wiley and Sons.
    Marshall, T. and Merry, S. (1990) Crime and Accountability: Victim/Offender Mediation in Practice.
    London: HMSO.
    Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What Works? - Questions and Answers about Prison Reform’, The Public
    Interest 10: 22-54.
    McGuire, J. and Priestley, P. (1985) Offending Behaviour: Skills and Stratagems for Going Straight.
    London: Batsford.
    Pawson, R. and Tilley, N. (1994) ‘What Works in Evaluation Research?’, British Journal of
    Criminology 34(3): 291-306.
    Plewis, I. (2000) ‘Educational Inequalities and Education Action Zones’, in C. Pantazis and D.
    Gordon (eds.) Tackling Inequalities: Where We Are Now and What Can be Done. Bristol: Policy
    Press.
    Richards, D. and Smith, M. J. (2002) Governance and Public Policy in the United Kingdom. Oxford:
    Oxford University Press.
    Schulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J. and Altman, D. G. (1995) ‘Empirical Evidence of Bias:
    Dimensions of Methodological Quality Associated with Estimates of Treatment Effects in
    Controlled Trials’, Journal of the American Medical Association 273: 408-412.
    Sebba, L. (2001) ‘On the Relationship Between Criminological Research and Policy: The Case of
    Victims’, Criminal Justice 1(1): 27-58.
    Sherman, L. and Strang, H. (2003) ‘Verdicts or Inventions? Interpreting Results from Randomized
    Controlled Experiments in Criminology’, American Behavioral Scientist 47(5): 575-607.
    Solesbury, W. (2001) Evidence Based Policy: Whence it Came and Where it’s Going. Working Paper 1.
    London: ERSC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice. Available online at:
    http://www.evidencenetwork.org/Documents/wp1.pdf (12 January 2004).Strang, H., Barnes, G., Braithwaite J. and Sherman L. W. (1999) Experiments in Restorative Policing:
    A Progress Report on the Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments (RISE). Available online at:
    http://www.aic.gov.au/rjustice (12 January 2004).
    Strang, H. and Sherman, L. (2003) Effects of Face-to-Face Restorative Justice on Repeat Offending and
    Victim Satisfaction: A Systematic Review for the Campbell Collaboration. (May 16, 2003).
    Tilley, N. (2001) ‘Evaluation and Evidence-led Crime Reduction Policy and Practice’, in R.
    Matthews and J. Pitts (eds.) Crime, Disorder and Community Safety: A New Agenda. London:
    Routledge.
    Tyler, T. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    Vennard, J., Sugg, D. and Hedderman, C. (1997) Changing Offenders’ Attitudes and Behaviour: What
    Works. Home Office Research Study 171. London: Home Office.
    Wilcox, A. (2003) ‘Evidence-based Youth Justice? Some Valuable Lessons from an Evaluation for
    the Youth Justice Board’, Youth Justice 3(1):19-33.
    Wilcox, A. with Hoyle, C. (2002) Final Report for the Youth Justice Board on the National Evaluation of
    Restorative Justice Projects. Unpublished report. London: Youth Justice Board.
    Young, R. and Hoyle, C. (1999) Restorative Cautioning: Strengthening Communities in the Thames
    Valley. Confidential Interim study. Oxford: Centre for Criminological Research, University of
    Oxford.
    Young, R. and Hoyle, C. (2000) ‘Examining the Guts of Restorative Justice’, Criminal Justice Matters
    40: 33-4.
    Young, R. (2001) ‘Just Cops doing Shameful Business’, in A. Morris and G. Maxwell (eds.)
    Restorative Justice for Juveniles. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 13 Sep 2007
    Last Modified: 28 Jul 2010 19:21
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/398

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©