Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

A critical ethnographic approach to facilitating cultural shift in midwifery

Hughes, Deborah, Deery, Ruth and Lovatt, Alison (2002) A critical ethnographic approach to facilitating cultural shift in midwifery. Midwifery, 18 (1). pp. 43-52. ISSN 0266-6138

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (141kB)

    Abstract

    Objective: to improve understanding of local midwifery morale, inform development and reorganisation of a maternity unit, and enhance midwifery involvement in strategic planning.

    Participants: a randomised stratified sample of 20 midwives working in a UK National Health Service (NHS) hospital and its surrounding community area.

    Method: within a critical ethnographic framework, focus groups were tape-recorded and transcribed, and analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.

    Findings: key areas affecting midwifery morale were identified, in particular staffing levels, working relationships and organisational issues. One year later, despite many changes having taken place, midwifery morale was still low but participants were more politically analytical of, and actively involved in changing their situation. The findings of the study indicate that there are complex and long-standing cultural inhibitions to the effective development of midwifery care but, if these are made explicit through a planned collaborative process, such as in this study, a process of cultural shift can be seen to begin.

    Implications for practice: focus groups can be a useful tool in moving midwifery culture forward within a local context.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: "Reprinted from Midwifery, Vol 18 No 1, Hughes Deery Lovatt, A critical ethnographic, 43-52., Copyright (2002), with permission from Elsevier." © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.
    Uncontrolled Keywords: midwifery maternity strategic planning midwives NHS
    Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
    R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Childhood Studies
    References:

    Burnard P 1991 A method of analysing interview
    transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education
    Today 11: 464–466
    Deery R 1999 Improving relationships through clinical
    supervision: 2. British Journal of Midwifery 7(4):
    160–163
    Deery R, Hughes D, Lovatt A et al. 1999 ‘Hearing
    midwives’ views’: focus groups on maternity care in
    Calderdale NHS Trust. Unpublished report, Primary
    Care Research Group, University of Huddersfield
    Deery R, Hughes D, Lovatt A 2000 ‘Quite a healthy
    exercise’: follow-up focus groups on maternity
    care in Calderdale NHS Trust. Unpublished report,
    Primary Care Research Group, University of Huddersfield
    Demilew J 1996 ‘Independent midwives’ views of supervision.
    In: Kirkham M (Ed) Supervision of Midwives.
    Books for Midwives Press, Hale
    DoH 1993 Changing Childbirth: report of the expert
    maternity group. Department of Health, London
    DoH 1997 The new NHS: modern, dependable. Department
    of Health, London
    DoH 1999 Making a difference. Department of Health,
    London
    Ely M, Anzul M, Friedman T et al. 1991 Doing qualitative
    research: circles within circles. The Falmer Press,
    London
    Grbich C 1999 Qualitative research in health. Sage
    Publications, London
    Green J, Hart L 1999 The impact of context on data. In:
    Barbour R.S, Kitzinger J (Eds) Developing focus
    group research: politics, theory and practice. Sage
    Publications, London
    Hammersley M, Atkinson P 1995 Ethnography: principles
    in practice, second edition. Routledge, London
    Hunt S, Symonds A 1995 The social meaning of
    midwifery. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke
    Jordan S, Yeomans D 1995 Critical ethnography:
    problems in contemporary theory and practice.
    British Journal of Sociology and Education 16(3):
    389–408
    Kent J 2000 Social perspectives on pregnancy and
    childbirth for midwives, nurses and the caring
    professions. Open University Press, Buckingham
    KirkhamM1999 The culture of midwifery in the National
    Health Service in England. Journal of Advanced
    Nursing 30(3): 732–739
    Kirkham M, Stapleton H 2000 Midwives’ support needs
    as childbirth changes. Journal of Advanced Nursing
    32 (2): 465-472
    Kitzinger J Barbour RS 1999 Introduction: the challenge
    and promise of focus group. In: Developing focus
    group research: politics, theory and practice. Barbour
    R S Kitzinger J (Eds) Sage Publications, London
    Leap N 1997 Making sense of ‘horizontal violence’ in
    midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery 5(11): 698
    Maguire P 2001 Uneven ground: feminisms and action
    research. In: Reason P Bradbury H (Eds) Handbook
    of action research: participative inquiry and practice.
    Sage Publications, London
    Marcus G 1994 What comes (just) after ‘post’? The case of
    ethnography. In: Denzin N Lincoln Y (Eds) Handbook
    of qualitative research. Sage Publications,
    London.
    Morse JM Field PA 1996 Nursing research: the application
    of qualitative approaches, Stanley Thornes
    (Publishers) Ltd., Cheltenham
    NHSE (1998) A consultation on a strategy for nursing,
    midwifery & health visiting. NHS Executive, Leeds
    Oakley A 1981 Interviewing women: a contradiction in
    terms. In: Roberts H (Ed) Doing feminist research.
    Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
    Reed J 1995 Practitioner knowledge in practitioner
    research. In: Reed J, Proctor S (Eds) Practitioner
    research in health care: the inside story. Chapman &
    Hall, London
    Reed J Biott, C 1995 Evaluating and developing practitioner
    research. In: Reed J, Proctor S (Eds) Practitioner
    research in health care: the inside story.
    Chapman & Hall, London
    Stapleton H, Duerden J, Kirkham M 1998 Evaluation of
    the impact of the supervision of midwives on
    professional practice and the quality of midwifery
    care. An ENB and UKCC commissioned project.
    University of Sheffield
    Twinn S 2000 The analysis of focus group data: a
    challenge to the rigour of qualitative research.
    Nursing Times Research 3 (2): 140–147
    Weitz R 1987 English midwives and the association of
    radical midwives. Women & Health 12(1): 79–89
    Wilkinson S 1999 How useful are focus group in feminist
    research? In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J (Eds) Developing
    focus group research: politics, theory and
    practice. Sage Publications, London

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 05 Apr 2007
    Last Modified: 28 Jul 2011 15:27
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/163

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©