Brent, Isabelle, Gibbs, Graham R. and Gruszczynska, Anna Katarzyna (2012) Obstacles to creating and finding Open Educational Resources: the case of research methods in the social sciences. Journal of Interactive Media in Education (JIME), Spring.
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (194kB) | Preview
Social Research Methods are approaches to undertaking research shared not only by the social sciences, but by many other disciplines. There is therefore enormous scope for the creation and re-use of open educational resources (OERs) in this field. However, our work with social scientists on a number of recent projects in the context of JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee)/ HEA (Higher Education Academy) supported UK OER programme suggests that there are some barriers to both OER creation and use. Although there are now a number of national and institutional projects creating learning resources in research methods and making them openly available for teachers and students to use, many still use licences that restrict re-use and, in particular, modification; we refer to these materials as ‘grey OERs’. We also found that, in contrast to the well-developed practice of citation in research work, academics and teachers had a narrow notion of licensing and copyright of teaching materials, consistent with a limited experience of sharing teaching materials. The tacit understanding of academics about learning resources also meant that they saw potential users as mainly other academics who were subject experts like themselves. That meant that they gave little weight to the role of broad description and metadata in making resources findable. At the same time, when academics looked for resources, the quality and relevance of those resources and the ability to judge that quickly were paramount.
We discuss two approaches that attempt to tackle these issues. First, the development of a mapping tool that supports those creating OERs to identify a range of classificatory and metadata in a way that gives those looking for resources a much wider range of ways of finding them. Second, the development of a website, based on Web 2.0 technology that exploits the contributions of academics using and reviewing research methods OERs. We suggest that the activities on a blog-based website creates a cultural context which constitutes an element of a community of practice of social science academics. Users can find resources by quality, pedagogy, and other metadata as well as content and through vicarious learning about the use and reviewing of resources by other academics, they may develop better practices in their own re-use and attribution of OERs.▼ Jump to Download Statistics
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Open educational resources, OER, Social research methods, metadata, community of practice|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
L Education > L Education (General)
|Schools:||School of Human and Health Sciences
School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Childhood Studies
Atkins D.E., Brown J.S., Hammond A.L. (2007). A Review of the Open Educational Resources (OER) Movement: Achievements, Challenges, and New Opportunities, Hewlett Foundation. Available from: http://www.oerderves.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/a-review-of-the-open-educational-resources-oer-movement_final.pdf [Accessed 2 February 2012]
Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Browne, T., Holding, R., Howell, A., Rodway-Dyer, S. The challenges of OER to Academic Practice. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, North America, 2010. Available from: http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/jime/article/view/2010-3 [Accessed 3 February 2012]
Burgos, J. V., & Ramirez, M. S. (2010). Open Educational Resources: Experiences of use in a Latin-American context, Paper presented at OpenEd 2010. Barcelona.
Campbell, L. M. (2009). OER Programme Technical Requirements. Available from: http://blogs.cetis.ac.uk/lmc/2009/02/03/oer-programme-technical-requirements/ [Accessed 3 June 2011].
Carey, T. & Hanley, G. (2008). Extending the impact of open educational resources through alignment with pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and institutional strategy: Lesson learned from the MERLOT community experience. In: T. Iiyoshi & M.S. Vijay Kumar (Eds.), Opening of education: The collective advancement of education through Open technology, open content and open knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press. Available from: http://tiny.cc/729qj [Accessed 4 February 2012]
Chin, P. (2010). Communities of practice in OER - experiences of a Subject Centre. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/events/2010/07/PaulChin.pdf [Accessed 11 June 2011].
Fowler, C. J. H., & Mayes, J. T. (1999). Learning relationships from theory to design. ALT-J, 7(3), 6 - 16.
Higher EducationAcademy [HEA]. (2007). HEAV (Higher EducationAcademy Vocabulary) Thesaurus. Available from: https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pX0HQqQ7tGc4t6F0k2YMaYQ#gid=0 [Accessed 1 June 2011].
Iiyoshi, T., & Kumar, M. S. V. (Eds.). (2008). Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Joint Information Systems Committee [JISC]. (2006). e-Assessment Glossary (Extended). Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/eAssess-Glossary-Extended-v1-01.pdf [Accessed 11 June 2011].
Joint Information Systems Committee [JISC]. (2009). IPR Toolkit. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/scaiprtoolkitoverview.pdf [Accessed 1 June 2011].
Koohang, A., & Harman, K. (2007). Advancing Sustainability of Open Educational Resources. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 4(2), 535-544.
Lee, M. M., Lin, M.-F. G., & Bonk, C. J. (2007). OOPS, Turning MIT Opencourseware into Chinese: An analysis of a community of practice of global translators. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 8(3).
Mackintosh, W. (2011). OERU Planning meeting: Information pack, Available from: http://wikieducator.org/index.php?oldid=659570 [Accessed 12 February 2012].
Marsh, D., Pountney, R., & Prigg, R. (2008). C-SAP scoping survey on the use of e-learning in the social sciences. Birmingham: C-SAP (Subject Centre for Sociology, Anthropology and Politics).
Masterman, L., Wild, J., White, D. & Manton, M. (2011). The impact of OER on teaching and learning in UK universities: implications for Learning Design. In Cameron, L. & Dalziel, J. (Eds). Proceedings of the 6th International LAMS & Learning Design Conference 2011: Learning design for a changing world (pp 135-144). 8-9 December 2011, Sydney: LAMS Foundation. Available from: http://lamsfoundation.org/lams2011sydney/papers.html [Accessed 4 February 2012]
Masterman, L., & Wild, J. (2011). OER Impact Study: Research Report. Bristol, UK: JISC. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/elearning/oer/JISCOERImpactStudyResearchReportv1-0.pdf [Accessed 4 February 2012]
Mayes, T., Dineen, F., McKendree, J., & Lee, J. (2001). Learning from watching others learn. In C. Steeples & C. Jones (Eds.), Networked learning. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 213-227.
McGill, L., Currier, S., Duncan, C., & Douglas, P. (2008). Good intentions: Improving the evidence base in support of sharing learning materials. Available from: http://ie-repository.jisc.ac.uk/265/1/goodintentionspublic.pdf [Accessed 4 February 2012]
Nikoi, S. K.; Rowlett, T. Armellini, A. & Witthaus, G. (2011) CORRE: a framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26:3, 191-207
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2007) Giving knowledge for free: The emergence of open educational resources. Paris: OECD - Educational Resources Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/7/38654317.pdf [Accessed 4 February 2012]
Schwen, T. M., & Hara, N. (2003). Community of Practice: A Metaphor for Online Design? The Information Society, 19, 257-270.
Sclater, N. (2009), "The organizational impact of open educational resources", in Ehlers, U.-D., Schneckenberg, D. (Eds), Changing Cultures in Higher Education: Moving Ahead to Future Learning, Springer-Verlag GmbH, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp.1-14.
Tiedau, U. 2010. VirtualDutch: Open Educational Resources and Distance Learning in a Lesser Taught Language Community. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/events/2010/07/UlrichTiedau.pdf [Accessed 2 January 2012].
Tosato, P. & Bodi, G. 2011. Collaborative Environments to Foster Creativity, Reuse and Sharing of OER. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Special Themed Issue on Creativity and Open Educational Resources (OER). Available from: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/special/2011/Tosato_Bodi.pdf [Accessed 11 February 2012]
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Yang, S. H. (2009). Using Blogs to Enhance Critical Reflection and Community of Practice. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 11-21.
Yuan, L. MacNeill, S., & Kraan, W. (2008). OER briefing paper. Available from: http://learn.creativecommons.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/oer_briefing_paper.pdf [Accessed 10 December 2011].
|Depositing User:||Graham Gibbs|
|Date Deposited:||12 Jul 2012 15:13|
|Last Modified:||06 Nov 2015 03:31|
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only: item control page