Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Algorithms for morphological profile filters and their comparison

Lou, Shan, Jiang, Xiangqian and Scott, Paul J. (2012) Algorithms for morphological profile filters and their comparison. Precision Engineering, 36 (3). pp. 414-423. ISSN 01416359

This is the latest version of this item.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (285kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Morphological filters, regarded as the complement of mean-line based filters, are useful in the analysis of surface texture and the prediction of functional performance. The paper first recalls two existing algorithms, the naive algorithm and the motif combination algorithm, originally developed for the traditional envelope filter. With minor extension, they could be used to compute morphological filters. A recent novel approach based on the relationship between the alpha shape and morphological closing and opening operations is presented as well. Afterwards two novel algorithms are developed. By correlating the convex hull and morphological operations, the Graham scan algorithm, original developed for the convex hull is modified to compute the morphological envelopes. The alpha shape method depending on the Delaunay triangulation is costly and redundant for the computation for the alpha shape for a given radius. A recursive algorithm is proposed to solve this problem. A series of observations are presented for searching the contact points. Based on the proposed observations, the algorithm partitions the profile data into small segments and searches the contact points in a recursive manner. The paper proceeds to compare the five distinct algorithms in five aspects: algorithm verification, algorithm analysis, performance evaluation, end effects correction, and areal extension. By looking into these aspects, the merits and shortcomings of these algorithms are evaluated and compared.

    ▼ Jump to Download Statistics
    Item Type: Article
    Subjects: T Technology > TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
    Schools: School of Computing and Engineering
    School of Computing and Engineering > Centre for Precision Technologies > Surface Metrology Group
    School of Computing and Engineering > Centre for Precision Technologies > EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Advanced Metrology
    Related URLs:
    References:

    [1] H. Von Weingraber, Zur Definition der Oberflächenrauheit, Werkstattstechnik Masch Bass 46 (1956).
    [2] V. Srinivasan, Discrete morphological filters for metrology, Proceedings of the 6th ISMQC Symposium on Metrology for Quality Control in Production TU Wien Austria (1998) 623-628.
    [3] C. M. Malburg, Surface profile analysis for conformable interfaces, Transactions of ASME 125 (2003) 624-627.
    [4] B. Muralikrishnan, J. Raja, Functional filtering and performance correlation of plateau honed surface profiles, Manufacture Science and Engineering 127 (2005) 193-197.
    [5] M. S. Shunmugam, V. Radhakrishnan, Two-and three dimensional analyses of surfaces according to the E-system, Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng. 188 (1974) 691-699.
    [6] P. J. Scott, The mathematics of motif combination and their use for functional simulation, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 32 (1992) 69-73.
    [7] S. Lou, X. Jiang, P. J. Scott, Fast algorithm to morphological filters, Journal of Physics: Conference Series 311 (2011): 1-5.
    [8] J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
    [9] H. Minkowski, Volumen and oberflache, Mathematical Annals 57 (1903) 447-495.
    [10] International Standards Organization, ISO 16610-41 Geometrical Product Specification (GPS)-Filtration Part 41: Morphological profile filters: Disk and horizontal line-segment filters, Switzerland, 2010.
    [11] H. Edelsbrunner, E. P. Mucke, Three-dimensional alpha shapes, ACM Trans. Graph. 13 (1994) 43-72.
    [12] M. Worring, W. M. Smelders, Shape of arbitrary finite point set in R2, Journal of Mathematical Image and Vision 4 (1994) 151-170.
    [13] G. Matheron, and J. Serra, The birth of mathematical morphology, Proc. 6th Intl. Symp. Mathematical Morphology (2002) 1-16.
    [14] H. J. A .M Heijmans, Mathematical morphology: a modern approach in image processing based on algebra and geometry. SIAM Review 37 (1995) 1-36
    [15] P. J. Scott Scale-space techniques Proceedings of the X International Colloquium on Surfaces (2000) 153-161
    [16] R. Graham, An efficient algorithm for determining the convex Hull of a finite planar set, Information Processing Letters 1 (1972) 132-133.
    [17] K. Fischer, Introduction to Alpha Shapes, http://www.inf.ethz.ch/personal/fischerk/pubs/as.pdf (2000)
    [18] C. B. Barber, D. P. Dobkin, H. T. Huhdanpaa, The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 4 (1996) 469-483.
    [19] M. H. Sedaaghi, Direct implementation of open-closing in morphological filtering, Electronic Letters 33 (1997) 198-199.
    [20] International Standards Organization, ISO 16610-28 Geometrical Product Specification (GPS)-Filtration-Profile Filters Part 28: profile filters: End effects, Switzerland, 2010.
    [21] F. Bernardini, J. Mittleman, H. Rushmeier, C. Silva, G. Taubin, The ball-pivoting algorithm for surface reconstruction, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 5 (1999) 349-359.

    Depositing User: Shan Lou
    Date Deposited: 23 Feb 2012 16:01
    Last Modified: 21 Jan 2013 16:23
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/12839

    Available Versions of this Item

    • Algorithms for morphological profile filters and their comparison. (deposited 23 Feb 2012 16:01)[Currently Displayed]

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©