Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Web 2.0 and its impact on lecturer identity: juggling tensions

Bennett, Elizabeth (2012) Web 2.0 and its impact on lecturer identity: juggling tensions. In: British Educational Research Association, 4-6 September 2012, Manchester, UK. (Unpublished)

[img] Microsoft PowerPoint - Presentation
Download (1MB)


This paper is based on a small scale study set in the north of England in a post ‘92 university. It explores lecturers’ practice in relation to their use of web 2.0 tools in their teaching. (Web 2.0 tools are web tools that allow participation and collaboration.) The study uses phenomenological principles to examine lecturers’ lived experience and to draw meaning from that experience (Taylor, 2008). The focus of the paper is on how lecturers’ sense of their professional self is changed resulting from use of web 2.0 tools in their teaching practice. It draws on an understanding of professional identities as being split and fluid Clegg (2008 p.332) and uses Stronach et al.’s notions of shards of identities and ecologies of practice and economies of performance to illuminate the way that lecturers identify themselves and how they see themselves in relation to others around them (2002).
The paper focuses on the tensions that lecturers experience using web 2.0 technologies because they give greater exposure and require lecturers to maintaining professional boundaries in a new way. Stronach et al. suggest that people resolve or accommodate tensions, yet the data from this study indicates that lecturers, both those who are experienced at using technology and those with less experience, juggle these tensions and some live with a sense of liminality, or uncertainty (Clegg 2006). This uncertainty relates to the pressures that lecturers are under, both inside-out pressures to serve their students better, and to the outside-in pressures to survive in a culture of performativity (Stronach et al. 2002). The strategies that lecturers use to juggle these tensions is discussed.
The paper explores the idea that the abundance of web sources challenges lecturers ontologically (Dohn 2009 p.117, Land and Bayne 2008 p.676). The findings support the idea that lecturers gain pleasure from designing activities which relinquishing mastery rather than exercising it (Clegg 2006 p.96) but challenges the notion that students might know more that the tutor or the “nightmare” of a stream of unanswerable questions” (Clegg, 2006 p.96). The practical strategies that lecturers’ use as they welcome new web 2.0 tools into their practices are discussed.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
Schools: School of Education and Professional Development
School of Education and Professional Development > Centre of Lifelong Learning and Social Justice
School of Education and Professional Development > Centre of Lifelong Learning and Social Justice > Teaching, Public Pedagogies and Professionalism Research Group
School of Education and Professional Development > Centre of Lifelong Learning and Social Justice > Technology Enhanced Learning Research Group
Related URLs:
References: Bradwell, P. (2009). The Edgeless University - Why Higher Education must embrace technology: Demos. Clegg, S., McManus, M., Smith, K., & Todd, M. J. (2006). Self-development in Support of Innovative Pedagogies: Peer support using email. International Journal for Academic Development, 11(2), 91 -100. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2008). Ubiquitous Learning: An Agenda for Educational Transformation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th Networked Learning, Greece. Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5). Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – opportunities, challenges and tensions: Becta. Downes, S. (2006). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London: Routledge Falmer. Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on network learning:an overview. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Jephcote, M., & Salisbury, J. (2009). Further education teachers' accounts of their professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 966-972. Kennedy, D., & Lefevre, D. (2009). Epigeum: Learning Technologies Online. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Internet Based Collaborative Technologies Kop, R. (2010). Networked Learning and Connectivity: Social Media, the Knowledgable other and Distance Learning University of Wales, Cardiff. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation (Third ed.). London: Free Press. Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved 24 March 2012, from Weller, M. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance. Spanish Journal of Pedagogy, 249, 223–236. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wiley, D. (2008). Openness and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education. Retrieved 10 March 2012, from Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent Learning and Learning Ecologies in Web 2.0. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(3), 1-21.
Depositing User: Liz Bennett
Date Deposited: 12 Dec 2012 11:15
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 11:25


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©