Woman centred care? An exploration of professional care in midwifery practice

This thesis explores what ‘woman centred care’ means to both women and
midwives and how this care is offered by midwives and perceived by women. It is
set within the context of current health care policy and the way in which this
impacts on both the organisation and implementation of maternity care.

A flexible qualitative design was used to explore both women’s and midwives’
experiences of current maternity care over the full trajectory of maternity
provision. A modified grounded theory approach was used framed within a
feminist perspective. The fieldwork was undertaken in two phases. In phase one
and interviews were undertaken with twelve women in early pregnancy, later
pregnancy and after the birth; a total of twenty-five interviews with women were
completed. Nine midwives were also interviewed in phase one. Preliminary and
tentative categories were identified from both sets of interviews and were used to
inform phase two of the study.

Five women participated in the second phase of data collection. This included
both informal, telephone contact and in-depth interviews spanning from early
pregnancy until after the birth and included observation of their care in labour.
The community midwives and delivery suite midwives specifically involved in
their care were also interviewed.

The data demonstrated a continued mismatch between the women’s and the
midwives’ perspectives and it was evident that despite the policy drivers and
consumerist rhetoric of ‘woman centred care’ and its original underpinning
principles of continuity, choice and control, that this was not the overriding
experience for the women who participated in the study. Data analysis
highlighted some opportunities for negotiation but these were not explicitly
recognised or realised by the women or midwives and there was little time or
flexibility in the system to accommodate such opportunities.

The increasing bureaucracy of the maternity care system also constrains continuity
of carer over the full spectrum of the childbearing trajectory and reduces the
potential for women to know the midwife who provided care. Thus for many
midwives being ‘with the institution’ was more likely than ‘being ‘with woman’.