Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Cross-benchmarking international competitiveness and performance in human language technologies

Kenny, Brian and Meaton, Julia (2007) Cross-benchmarking international competitiveness and performance in human language technologies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 14 (5). pp. 594-608. ISSN 1463-5771

Metadata only available from this repository.


Competitive success as a nation requires balancing commercial innovativeness and social welfare, which results in a sound basis for socio-economic development. All potential resources – including entrepreneurial activity and innovations – can be utilized as promoters of competitiveness and welfare. Thus, useful lessons for general national competitiveness can be learned from benchmarking individual innovations and perhaps even more so, from those less glamorized technologies such as human language technologies (HLT). Finnish researchers are considered to be at the leading edge of developments in a number of ICT fields. The main responsibility for the utilization of knowledge is seen, necessarily, to rest with the public sector, while the legislative framework is considered to favour entrepreneurship and innovation. Aims to discuss the issues.
Design/methodology/approach – National competitiveness and HLT benchmarking pose a number of interesting questions and issues both macro and micro levels. For example: the extent to which benchmark performance in HLT is consistent with national competitiveness; link between robustness of research effort in any particular language community and effectiveness of technology transfer to market; and fostering and funding of entrepreneurial activity in HLT in the successful (benchmarked) countries and the fit with national vision and innovation policy. For the first two areas, relationships between HLT benchmark and comparative national competitiveness of top countries are examined through comparison of their respective primitive dimensions. Data sources include official and quasi-official public documents. The final stage is explored using a case study approach and comparative assessment against extant entrepreneurship literature.
Findings – There appears to be no direct link between robustness of the HLT research effort in any particular language community and actual effectiveness of technology transfer to market. None the less, success in the Finnish HLT benchmark appears to correlate with the country's international competitiveness standing and “social innovation policy” paradigm. Its knowledge society model has clearly resulted in a sound basis for its socio-economic development, where all potential resources – including its entrepreneurial base – and innovations, can be utilized as promoters of competitiveness and welfare. Within this entrepreneurial base, HLT SMEs tend to seek scale economies through internationalise at the early stages of development.
Originality/value – The paper shows that Finland is well placed to meet the challenges and to capitalise on the economic and social opportunities, given its strength in ICT/HLT innovation policy country's open self-criticism of the latter

Item Type: Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Schools: Huddersfield Business School
Huddersfield Business School > Emerging Markets Research Group
Related URLs:
References: 1. Arppe, A. (2004), "Finnish lessons: no single path to market", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 2. Baumol, W. (1990), "Entrepreneurship: productive, unproductive and destructive", Journal of Political Economy, Vol.98, No. 5, pp 893-921 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] [CrossRef] 3. Bell, J. (1995), "The internationalisation of small computer software firms ? a further challenge to ?stage? theories", European Journal of Marketing, Vol.29, No. 8, pp 60-75 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] [CrossRef] 4. Bowen, H.P., Moesen, W. (2005), "Benchmarking the competitiveness of nations: non-uniform weighting and non-economic dimensions", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 5. Castells, M., Himanen, P. (2002), The Information Society and the Welfare State, The Finnish Model, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 6. COM (2004), 7. COM (2003), 8. Dana, L.P., Dana, T.E., Spence, M. (2004), "Public policy and international expansion of high-technology SMEs: a research agenda", International Journal of Entrepreneurship & Innovation Management, Vol.4, No. 2/3, pp 115-23 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 9. Dattakumar, R., Jagadeesh, R. (2003), "A review of literature on benchmarking", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol.10, No. 3, pp 176-209 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] [CrossRef] 10. Drayton, W. (2002), "The citizen sector: becoming as competitive and entrepreneurial as business", California Management Review, Vol.44, No. 3, pp 120-32 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 11. Euromap (2003), "Benchmarking HLT progress in Europe", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 12. Golden, W., Higgins, E., Lee, S.H. (2003), "National innovation systems and entrepreneurship", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 13. Himanen, P. (2001), The Hacker Ethic, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 14. Hughes, A. (2003), "Knowledge transfer, entrepreneurship and economic growth: some reflections and implications for policy in The Netherlands", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 15. Keinäne, L. (2003), 16. Lavikainen, J. (2004), Probing the Information Society: Converging Objectives in Finnish and Pan-European Development, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 17. Lockwood, R., Joscelyne, A. (2003), 18. Macmillan, I.C., McGrath, R.G. (2004), Nine Integrated Roles of Technology Development Managers, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 19. McArthur, J.W., Sachs, J.D. (2002), "The growth competitiveness index: measuring technological advancement and the stages of development", The Global Competitiveness Report 2001?2002, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 20. McNair, C.J., Leibfried, K.H.J. (1992), Benchmarking: A Tool for Continuous Improvement, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 21. Muizer, A. (2003), Knowledge Transfer in: Entrepreneurship in the Netherlands, EIM Business & Policy Research, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 22. Norton, W.I. Jr, Moore, W.T. (2000), "Entrepreneurial risk: have we been asking the wrong question?", Small Business Economics, Vol.18, No. 4, pp 281-7 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] [CrossRef] 23. Oviatt, B.M., McDougall, P.P. (1994), "Toward a theory of international new ventures", Journal of International Business Studies, Vol.25, No. 1, pp 45-64 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] [CrossRef] 24. Pelkonen, A. (2004), "Questioning the finnish model ? forms of public engagement in building the finnish information society", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 25. Regional Business Development Analysis Literature Review (2002), 26. Romijn, H., Albu, M. (2002), "Innovation, networking, and proximity: lessons from small high-technology firms in the United Kingdom", Regional Studies, Vol.36, No. 1, pp 81-6 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] [CrossRef] 27. Russell, R.D. (1997), "Impact of national culture on the emergence of entrepreneurship", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 28. Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland (2003), "Knowledge, innovation and internationalization", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 29. Sipilä, K. (2004), A Country that Innovates, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 30. Spann, M.S., Adams, M. (1997), "Seed funding for high technology ventures: the role of the bridge business", [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 31. Watson, G.H. (2002), The Benchmarking Workbook: Adapting Best Practices for Performance Improvement, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 32. WEF (2004), The Global Competitiveness Report 2003-2004, [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] 33. Yasin, M. (2002), "The theory and practice of benchmarking: then and now", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol.9, No. 3, pp 217-43 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve] [CrossRef] 34. Zairi, M., Ahmed, P.K. (1999), "Benchmarking maturity as we approach the millennium?", Total Quality Management, Vol.10, No. 4/5, pp S810-6 [Manual Request] [Infotrieve
Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 06 Mar 2008 09:31
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 10:38


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©