Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Using theory-based evaluation to build evidence-based health and social care policy and practice

Bonner, Lesley (2003) Using theory-based evaluation to build evidence-based health and social care policy and practice. Critical Public Health, 13 (1). pp. 77-92. ISSN 0958-1596

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (128kB)


Building an evidence base to underpin policy and practice in health and social care is one of the cornerstones of New Labour's modernization programme. However, the history of evaluation research in Britain and America suggests that this enterprise may be thwarted as much by politics as by methodological debates. The 'paradigm wars' that characterize the social sciences also feature in the field of evaluation research, and changes in the way 'health' is conceptualized in the 'new public health' have intensified debates about approaches to evaluation and what counts as evidence. Health Action Zones have been vaunted as both the 'flagships' of the government's health policy and as 'learning initiatives'. This paper uses the example of Health Action Zones to discuss the use of a theory-based approach to evaluation for the purpose of generating the policy learning needed to tackle health inequalities, drawing on experience in Plymouth. The limitations of the 'traditional' approach to evaluation are examined, along with recent guidance from the Medical Research Council about evaluating complex community initiatives. It is argued that the case for theory-based evaluation extends beyond criticism of the traditional approach to develop evaluation theory and practice from the perspective of critical realism. This approach to evaluation seeks explanation and understanding about how and why projects 'work' or not in specific contexts, rather than pragmatic solutions to de-contextualized problems. The paper concludes by reflecting on the politics of evaluation in the field of health and social care, calling into question the government's commitment to evidence-based policy and practice

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2003 Taylor & Francis Ltd
Uncontrolled Keywords: critical public mental community health theory-based evaluation evidence-based social care policy practice
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
References: Bhasker, R. (1975) A Realist Theory of Social Science (Leeds, Leeds Books; 2nd edn 1979, Brighton, Harvester). Bhasker, R. (1979) The Possibility of Naturalism (Brighton, Harvester; 2nd edn 1989, Hemel Hempstead, Harvester Wheatsheaf ). Black, N. (1996) Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care. British Medical Journal, 312,11 May, pp. 1215–1218.Brown, P. (1995) The role of the evaluator in comprehensive community initiatives. In: New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Vol. 1: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts [http://]. Campbell, D.T. (1969) Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist, 24, pp. 409–429. Campbell, D.T. (1982) Experiments as arguments. In: House, E.R., Mathison, S., Pearsol, J.A. & Preskill, H. (eds) Evaluation Studies Review Annual (Beverly Hills, CA, Sage), Vol. 7, pp. 117–127. Campbell, D. & Stanley, J. (1963) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Evaluations in Social Research (Rand McNally, Chicago). Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A., Kinmonth, A.L., Sandercock, P., Spiegelhalter, D. & Tyrer, P. (2000) Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 321(7262), p. 694. Chen, H.T. & Rossi, P.H. (1983) Evaluating with sense: the theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review, 7, pp. 283–302. Connell, J.P. & Kubisch, A.C. (1998) Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: progress, prospects, and problems. In: Fulbright- Anderson, K., Kubisch, A.C. & J.P. Connell (eds) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives, Vol. 2: Theory, Measurement, and Analysis (Washington, DC, Aspen Institute). Cotterill, L. (2000) Preliminary Report: Evaluation Strategy and Action Plan, Position Statement (Plymouth, University of Plymouth). Cotterill, L. & Cole, M.S. (2002) The Learning Communities Evaluation, Plymouth Health Action Zone: Strategic Level Over-View, Unpublished Report (University of Plymouth). Davies, H.T.O., Nutley, S.M. & Smith, P.C. (eds) (2000) What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services (London, Policy Press). Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (2000) Collaboration and Co-ordination in Area-based Regeneration Initiatives, Regeneration Research Summary No. 35 (London, RegionalCo-ordination Unit, DETR) []. Department of Health (1997a) The New NHS: Modern, Dependable, Cm. 3807 (London, Stationery Office). Department of Health (1997b) Health Action Zones—Invitation to Bid, EL(97)65, 30 October (Leeds, Department of Health). Department of Health (1998a) A First Class Service (London, Department of Health). Department of Health (1998b) Modernising Social Services, Cm 4169 (London, Stationery Office). Department of Health (1998c) Modernising Mental Health Services, Safe, Sound and Supportive (London, Department of Health). Department of Health (1999a) Saving Lives: Our Healthier Nation, Cm 4386 (London, Stationery Office). Department of Health (1999b) National Service Framework for Mental Health (London, Department of Health). Department of Health (1999c) Modernising Government, Cm 4310 (London, Stationery Office). Department of Health (2000) The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment. A Plan for Reform, Cm 4818-1 (London, Stationery Office). Department of Health (2001) Tackling Health Inequalities, Consultation on a Plan for Delivery (London, Department of Health). Guba, E.G. (1972) The failure of educational evaluation. In: Weiss, C.H. (ed.) Evaluating Action Programs (Allyn & Bacon, Boston), pp. 250–266. Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA). Harre, R. (1972) The Philosophies of Science (Oxford University Press, Oxford). Heathfield, H., Pitty, D. & Hanka, R. (1998) Evaluating information technology in health care: barriers and challenges. British Medical Journal, 316, pp. 1959–1961 (27 June). Higgins, J. (1998) HAZs warning. Health Service Journal, 16 April, pp. 24–25.Judge, K. & Bauld, L. (2001) Strong theory, flexible methods: evaluating complex communitybased initiatives. Critical Public Health, 11(1), pp. 19–38. Judge, K., Bauld, L., Barnes, M., Benzeval, M., Killoran, A., Robinson, R. & Wigglesworth, R. (1999) Health Action Zones: Learning to Make a Difference, PSSRU Discussion Paper 1546 (Canterbury, University of Kent: Canterbury, Kent). Mant, D. (1999) Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients? The Lancet, 353, pp. 743–746 (27 February). MedicalResearch Council(2000) A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Healt, Discussion document (London, MRC). NHS Executive (1998) The New NHS Modern and Dependable: A National Framework for Assessing Performance (Leeds, NHSE). Office for Public Management (2000) The Evaluation of Area-based Initiatives (London, Office for Public Management). Patton, M.Q. (1975) Alternative Evaluation Research Paradigm (Grand Fork, University of North Dakota). Patton, M.Q. (1986) Utilization-Focused Evaluation, 2nd edn (Newbury Park, CA, Sage Publications). Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1994) What works in evaluation research? British Journal of Criminology, 34, pp. 391–206. Pawson, R. & Tilley, N. (1997) Realistic Evaluation (London, Sage Publications). Plymouth Health Action Zone (1999) Plymouth Health Action Zone Implementation Plan January 1999–April 2000 (Plymouth, Plymouth Health Action Zone). Rossi, P.H., Freeman, H.E. & Lipsey, M.W. (1999) Evaluation A Systematic Approach, 6th edn (London, Sage Publications). Sayer, A. (2000) Realism and Social Science (London, Sage Publications). Shadish Jr., W.R., Cook, T.D. & Leviton, L.C. (1991) Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice (London, Sage). Sheldon, B. & Macdonald, G. (1999) Research and Practice in Social Care: Mind the Gap (Exeter, Centre for Evidence-Based SocialServices, University of Exeter). Smith, G.R. (1999) Area-based Initiatives: The Rationale for and Options for Area Targeting (London, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics). Stake, R.E. (ed.) (1975) Evaluating the Arts in Education: A Responsive Approach (Coloumbus, OH, Merrill). Weiss, C.H. (1970) The politicization of evaluation research. Journal of Social Issues, 26, pp. 57–68. Weiss, C.H. (1972) Evaluation Research (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall). Weiss, C.H. (1983) The stakeholder approach to evaluation: origins and promise. In: Bryk, A. (ed.) Stakeholder-Based Evaluation (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass), pp. 3–14. Weiss, C.H. (1995) Nothing as practical as good theory: exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In: Connell, J.P., Kubisch, A.C., Schorr, L.B. & Weiss, C.H. (eds) New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods and Contexts (Washington, DC, Aspen Institute). Wilson, E. (1979) The Mental as Physical (London, Routledge). World Health Organisation Europe (1998) Health Promotion Evaluation: Recommendations to Policy- Makers, Report to the WHO European Working Group on Health Promotion Evaluation (Copenhagen, WHO).
Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 03 Aug 2007
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 23:31


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©