Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

A comparison of the equity-supportiveness of organizational cultures of (public) NHS organizations and (private) Social Enterprise (SE) providers

Patnaik, Ashok (2017) A comparison of the equity-supportiveness of organizational cultures of (public) NHS organizations and (private) Social Enterprise (SE) providers. Doctoral thesis, The University of Huddersfield.

[img] PDF - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 January 2018.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB)

Abstract

Title: A Comparison of the Equity-supportiveness of Organizational Cultures of (Public) NHS Organizations and (Private) Social Enterprise (SE) Providers

Theory: New Public Management (NPM) has been the most influential paradigm in public administration in the last three decades. NPM-driven ideas such as provider competition, privatisation and patient choice have resulted in increased interest from recent UK governments in Social Enterprises (SEs) for delivering public health services. NPM-based changes have been criticized for creating inequitable provision of healthcare and increasing unjust health inequalities. It is worth asking whether equity for patients is promoted equally effectively by public (NHS) organizations and SE providers.

Research Aims and Methodology: A mixed methods approach was employed. The quantitative strand used a survey to compare the equity-supportiveness of NHS and SE organizational cultures [124 respondents (68 NHS and 56 SE staff) from 21 organizations (12 NHS and 9 SEs)]. The qualitative strand used semi-structured interviews with 27 SE staff members to examine organizational changes in SEs and the impact of these changes on equity in service provision.

Findings: By achieving better alignment with organizational values, reducing bureaucracy, speeding up decision-making, giving staff more autonomy and responsibility, encouraging initiative, risk-taking and innovation, involving staff more actively in strategic decision-making, and making better use of technology, Social Enterprises are promoting equity to an equal or greater degree than public (NHS) organizations.

Implications: However, the SE model (currently limited to community healthcare services) remains unclear and problematic, suggesting caution in its use by larger NHS acute Trusts. More research is needed before a policy to support the adoption of the SE model in public service delivery is mainstreamed.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
Depositing User: Sally Hughes
Date Deposited: 16 Mar 2017 15:29
Last Modified: 16 Mar 2017 19:30
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/31550

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©