Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Shifting the focus: children's image-making practices and their implications for analysis

Lomax, Helen (2012) Shifting the focus: children's image-making practices and their implications for analysis. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 35 (3). pp. 227-234. ISSN 1743-727X

Metadata only available from this repository.


This paper provides analytic focus on the productive and editorial contexts of children and young people's image-making, making visible its implications for the analysis of photographs. Drawing on participatory research in which children and young people worked alongside researchers to create a visual narrative of their lived experiences of neighbourhood, the paper suggests that greater attention to children's image-making practices brings an important dimension to the interpretative challenges generated by the visual. Through a focus on image-making and its productive and editorial contexts, the paper shifts the analytic focus away from the image as a site of meaning-making to encompass the ways in which photographs acquire multiple meanings through the lived experience of their creators.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: childhood, visual methods, interpretation, context, production, creative process
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Schools: School of Education and Professional Development
Related URLs:
References: Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research, London: Sage. [CrossRef], [Google Scholar] Brent, J. 2009. Searching for community: Representation, power and action on an urban estate. Bristol: Policy Press Clark, A. 2010. Transforming children's spaces: Children's and adult's participation in designing learning environments, Oxford: Routledge. [Google Scholar] Connor, S. and Huggins, R. 2010. “The technology and the artefacts of social control: Monitoring criminal and anti-social behaviour through and in media cultures”. In Sociology of crime, law and deviance. Vol. 15, Social control: Informal, legal and medical, Edited by: Chriss, J. 109–28. Emerald.[CrossRef], [Google Scholar] Edwards, E. 2009. “Thinking photography beyond the visual?”. In Photography: Theoretical snapshots, Edited by: Long, J., Noble,, A. and Welch, E. 31–48. Oxford: Routledge. [Google Scholar] Fink, J. 2012. Walking the neighbourhood, seeing community: Reflections from a photography walking tour. Critical Social Policy, 32(1): 31–50. [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Fink, J. and Lomax, H. (2012). Inequalities and images: Insights for policy and practice. Critical Social Policy 32, no. 1: 3–11 Grosvenor, I. and Hall, A. 2012. Back to school from a holiday in the slums!: Images, words and inequalities. Critical Social Policy, 32(1): 11–30. [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Hendrick, H. 2003. Child welfare: Historical dimensions, contemporary debate, Bristol: The Policy Press. [Google Scholar] Holland, P. 2004. Picturing childhood: The myth of the child in popular imagery, London: I.B. Tauris. [Google Scholar] Holloway, S. L. and Valentine, G. 2000. Children's geographies: Playing, living, learning, London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] Index of Multiple Deprivation. 2010. Districts in England (2011), London: Communities and Local Government. [Google Scholar] Krase, J. 2004. Visualizing ethnic vernacular landscapes. In Race and ethnicity in New York City, ed. J. Krase and R. Hutchison, 1–24. Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press. Lomax, H. 2012. Contested voices? Methodological tensions and the politics of knowing in creative visual research with children. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 15, no 2: 103–15 Lomax, H. J. and Fink, J. 2010. Interpreting images of motherhood: The contexts and dynamics of collective viewing. Sociological Research Online, 15(3)[CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Luttrell, W. 2010. ‘A camera is a big responsibility’: A lens for analysing children's visual voices. Visual Studies, 25(3): 224–37. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Mannay, D. 2010. Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible?. Qualitative Research, 10(1): 91–111. [CrossRef], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Morrow, V. 2001. Using qualitative methods to elicit young people's perspectives on their environments: Some ideas from community health initiatives. Heath Education Research, 16(3): 225–68. [Google Scholar] Morrow, V. and Mayall, B. 2009. What is wrong with children's well-beingin the UK? Questions of meaning and measurement. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 31(3): 217–29. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar] Orellana, M. 1999. Space and Place in an urban landscape: Learning from children's views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology, 14: 73–89. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar] Parker, D. and Karner, C. 2010. Reputational geographies and urban social cohesion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(8): 1451–70. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography, 1, London: Sage Publications. [Google Scholar] Popay, J., Thomas, C., Williams, G., Bennett, S., Gatrell, A. and Bostock, L. 2003. A proper place to live: Health inequalities, agency and the normative dimensions of space. Social Science & Medicine, 57: 55–69. [CrossRef], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®], [CSA], [Google Scholar] Prosser, J. 2007. Visual methods and the visual culture of schools. Visual Studies, 22(1): 13–30. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar] Radley, A. 2010. What people do with pictures. Visual Studies, 25(3): 268–79. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®], [Google Scholar] Rogaly, B. and Taylor, B. 2011. Moving histories of class and community: Identity, place and belonging in contemporary England, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. [Google Scholar] Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologie, 1, London: Sage. [Google Scholar] Rose, G. 2006. Spatialites of ‘community’, power and change: The imagined geographies of community arts projects. Cultural Studies, 11(1): 1–16. [CSA], [Google Scholar] Sewell, K. 2011. Researching sensitive issues: A critical appraisal of ‘draw-and-write’ as a data collection technique in eliciting children's perceptions. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 34(2): 175–91. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar] Social Policy Research Unit. 2010. Child well-being index 2009: Lower super output area analysis, London: Communities and Local Government. [Google Scholar] Thomson, P. 2008. Doing visual research with children and young people, Edited by: Thomson, P. London: Routledge. [Google Scholar] Trachtenberg, A. 1989. Reading American photographs: Images as history from Matthew Brady to Walker Evans, New York: Noonday Press. [Google Scholar] Ward, C. 1977. The child in the city, London: The Architectural Press. [Google Scholar] Wiles, R., Coffey, A., Robison, J., and Heath, S. 2010. Anonymisation and visual images: Issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection. Anonymisation and visual images, (Unpublished).
Depositing User: Sally Hughes
Date Deposited: 15 Mar 2017 10:57
Last Modified: 28 Mar 2018 08:00


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©