Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Seen and heard? Ethics and agency in participatory visual research with children, young people and families

Lomax, Helen (2015) Seen and heard? Ethics and agency in participatory visual research with children, young people and families. Families, Relationships and Societies, 4 (3). pp. 493-502. ISSN 2046-7435

PDF - Accepted Version
Download (511kB) | Preview


This article examines the ethical responsibilities engendered by participatory visual research with children and young people, focusing on the challenges that can emerge in the production and dissemination of research seeking to visually portray their experiences. The article considers the possibilities of a feminist ethics of care for working co-productively with participants in order to resolve conflicts between individual and collective voices, researchers’ agendas and the ways in which images may be understood by audiences.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is a post-peer-review, pre-copy edited version of an article published in Families, Relationships and Societies. The definitive publisher-authenticated version Lomax, H. (2015) 'Seen and heard? Ethics and agency in participatory visual research with children, young people and families', Families, Relationships and Societies 4 (3): 493-502 is available online at: The version on this repository is the author's post-print version and it is not to be cited.
Uncontrolled Keywords: feminist ethics, children, participatory visual methods
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Schools: School of Education and Professional Development
Related URLs:
References: Alderson, P, Morrow, V, 2004, Ethics, social research and consulting with children and young people, London: Barnardo’s Back, L, 2009, Portrayal and betrayal: Bourdieu, photography and sociological life, Sociological Review, 57, 3, 471-90 Banks, M, 2001, Visual methods in social research, London: Sage Publications Brady, G, Brown, G, 2013, Rewarding but let’s talk about the challenges: using arts based methods in research with young mothers, Methodological Innovations Online, 8, 1, 99-112 Brent, J, 2009, Searching for community: Representation, power and action on an urban estate, Bristol: Policy Press Cahill, C, 2007, Doing research with young people: participatory research and the rituals of collective work, Children’s Geographies, 5, 3, 297-312 Catalani, C, Minkler, M, 2010, Photovoice: a review of the literature in health and public health, Health Education & Behavior, 37, 3, 424-51 Connor, S, 2012, Who are the poor? From lady poverty to welfare queens, paper presented to the Joint East Asian Social Policy Research Network (EASP) and United Kingdom Social Policy Association (SPA) Annual Conference, ‘Social Policy in an Unequal World’, University of York, UK Crow, G, Wiles R, 2008, Managing anonymity and confidentiality in social research: Thecase of visual data in community research, Working Paper, 8/08, Southampton: National Centre for Research Methods Darian-Smith, K, Henningham, N, 2014, Social research and the privacy and participation: reflections on researching Australian children’s playlore, Children and Society, 28, 327-38 Dingwall, R, 2008, The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research, 21st Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 3, 1, 1-12 Fink, J, 2008, Inside a hall of mirrors: residential care and the shifting constructions of childhood in mid-twentieth-century Britain, Paedagogica Historica, 44, 3, 287-307 Fink, J, Lomax, H, 2012, Researching through the visual: challenging images and the challenges of images, paper presented at the Social Research Association Annual Conference, British Library, London, December Fink, J, Lomax, H, 2014, Challenging images? Dominant, residual and emergent meanings in on-line media representations of child poverty, Journal for the Study of British Cultures, 1, 21, 79-95 Gabb, J, 2010, Home truths: ethical issues in family research, Qualitative Research, 10, 461-78 Gallacher, L-A, Gallagher, M, 2008, Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through ‘participatory methods’, Childhood, 15, 499-516 Haaken, J, O’Neill, M, 2014, Moving images: psychoanalytically informed visual methods in documenting the lives of women migrants and asylum seekers, Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 1, 79-89 Hendrick, H, 2003, Child welfare: Historical dimensions, contemporary debate, Bristol: Policy Press Holland, P, 2006, Picturing childhood: The myth of the child in popular imagery, London: I.B. Tauris Iphofen, R, 2011, Ethical decision making in qualitative research, Qualitative Research, 11, 4, 443-6 Jenks, C, 1996, Childhood, London: Routledge Lomax, H, Fink, J, 2010, Interpreting images of motherhood: the contexts and dynamics of collective viewing, Sociological Research Online, 15, 3, Lomax, H, Fink, J, Singh, N, High, C, 2011, The politics of performance: methodological challenges of researching children’s experiences of childhood through the lens of participatory video, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 3, 231-43 McKendrick, J, Sinclair, S, Irwin, A, O’Donnell, H, Scott, G, Dobbie, L, 2008, The media, poverty and public opinion in the UK, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Mannay, D, 2013, ‘I like rough pubs’: exploring places of safety and danger in violent and abusive relationships, Families, Relationships and Societies, 2, 1, 131-7 Mannay, D, 2014, Personal communication, December. Miller, T, Birch, M, Mauthner, M, Jessop, J, 2012, Ethics in qualitative research, London: Sage Publications Mind, M, 2008, Conducting qualitative research with people with learning, communication and other disabilities: methodological challenges, paper presented at the National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton, November Moore, N, 2012, The politics and ethics of naming: questioning anonymisation in (archival) research, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 15, 4, 331-40 Parvez, N, 2011, Visual representations of poverty, City: analysis of urban trends, culture, theory, policy, action, 15, 6, 686–95 Prosser, J, Loxley, A, 2008, Introducing visual methods, NCRM Methodological Review, Sweetman, P, 2009, Just anybody? Images, ethics and recognition, in J. Gillett (ed) Just anybody, Winchester: Fotonet/The Winchester Gallery, 7-9 Tilley, E, Woodthorpe, K, 2011, Is it the end of anonymity as we know it? A critical examination of the ethical principle of anonymity in the context of 21st century demands on the qualitative researcher, Qualitative Research, 11, 2, 197-212 Tronto, J, 1993, Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care, London:Routledge Tyler, I, 2013, Revolting subjects: Social abjection and resistance in neoliberal Britain, London:Zed Books Van Dijck, J, 2008, Digital photography: communication, identity, memory, VisualCommunication, 71, 1, 57-76 Wang, C, 2006, Youth participation in photo voice as a strategy for community change, Journal of Community Practice, 14, 1-2, 147-61 Ward, L, Gahagan, B, 2010, Crossing the divide between theory and practice: research and an ethic of care, Ethics and Social Welfare, 4, 2, 210-16 Wiles, R, Clark, A, Prosser, J, 2011, Visual research ethics at the crossroads, in E. Margolis and L. Pauwels (eds) The Sage handbook of visual research methods, London: Sage Publications Wiles, R, Coffey, A, Robison, J, Heath, S, 2010, Anonymisation and visual images: Issues of respect, ‘voice’ and protection, NCRM Working Paper Series, Southampton and Cardiff: National Centre for Research Methods and Wales Institute of Social & Economic Research
Depositing User: Sally Hughes
Date Deposited: 15 Mar 2017 09:38
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 16:09


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©