Nikitas, Alexandros, Wallgren, Pontus and Rexfelt, Oskar (2016) The paradox of public acceptance of bike sharing in Gothenburg. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability, 169 (3). pp. 101-113. ISSN 1478-4629
This is the latest version of this item.
![]() |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
Bike sharing is one of the most promising urban planning interventions to facilitate an all-necessary transition towards a more sustainable transport paradigm. Regardless of the fact that hundreds of schemes run in more than 50 countries worldwide, bike sharing is still moderately investigated by research. This paper reports on a primarily quantitative study of 558 responses that was set to frame attitudes reflecting public acceptance towards the rapidly expanding bike-sharing scheme in Gothenburg (Styr & Ställ), in an attempt to identify the ‘formula for success’. The respondents generally believed that Styr & Ställ is a pro-environmental, inexpensive and healthy transport mode, which complements the city’s public transport services and promotes a more human-friendly identity for Gothenburg.
Even the respondents that self-reported a small (or no) likelihood to use bike sharing were positive towards the scheme. This means that they recognise that bike sharing has a significant pro-social potential and is not a system favouring a particular road-user segment over others that might not be interested or able to use it. The fact that the majority of the respondents do not Bike sharing is one of the most promising urban planning interventions to facilitate an all-necessary transition
towards a more sustainable transport paradigm. Regardless of the fact that hundreds of schemes run in more than 50 countries worldwide, bike sharing is still moderately investigated by research. This paper reports on a primarily
quantitative study of 558 responses that was set to frame attitudes reflecting public acceptance towards the rapidly expanding bike-sharing scheme in Gothenburg (Styr & Ställ), in an attempt to identify the ‘formula for success’. The respondents generally believed that Styr & Ställ is a pro-environmental, inexpensive and healthy transport mode, which complements the city’s public transport services and promotes a more human-friendly identity for Gothenburg. Even the respondents that self-reported a small (or no) likelihood to use bike sharing were positive towards the scheme. This means that they recognise that bike sharing has a significant pro-social potential and is not a system favouring a particular road-user segment over others that might not be interested or able to use it. The fact that the majority of the respondents do not use the scheme and yet its popularity is still vast indicates that there is much potential for more use in real terms.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
Schools: | Huddersfield Business School |
Related URLs: | |
Depositing User: | Alexandros Nikitas |
Date Deposited: | 29 Sep 2016 11:26 |
Last Modified: | 28 Aug 2021 16:43 |
URI: | http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/29529 |
Available Versions of this Item
- The paradox of public acceptance of bike sharing in Gothenburg. (deposited 29 Sep 2016 11:26) [Currently Displayed]
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only: item control page
![]() |
View Item |