Power, agency, deference and difference
Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations

Abstract

With a view to uncovering the political implications of notational, technological and musical innovation in composer–performer relationships within Western art music, this paper examines three disparate works: Christian Wolff’s Duo for Pianists II (1958); Brian Ferneyhough’s Unity Capsule (1975); and Georg Hajdu’s Schwer… unheimlich Schwer (2009). By first exploring two innovative 20th century works, Duo for Pianists II and Unity Capsule, the paper establishes a framework for a discussion of the political and ethical dimensions of composer–performer relationships in relation to the 21st century innovation manifest in Schwer… unheimlich Schwer (2009). This multidimensional examination draws on Warren’s (2014) examination of the relationships between ethics and music, Godlovitch’s (1998) philosophy of performance, and research carried out by practitioners such as Couroux (2002), Schick (2006) and Eigenfeldt (2011; 2014). The paper concludes that all three pieces demonstrate the potential for notation to have strong political implications, and that composers are ultimately responsible for the political implications of the performance experience.

How to Cite

Aulich, J., (2016) “Power, agency, deference and difference Examining the politics of composer–performer relationships in the wake of recent innovations”, Fields: journal of Huddersfield student research 2(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.5920/fields.2016.2116

Download

Download PDF

624

Views

262

Downloads

Share

Authors

John Aulich

Download

Issue

Dates

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0

Identifiers

Peer Review

This article has been peer reviewed.

File Checksums (MD5)

  • PDF: 5dfc01e3e05a5fd796eeeef209411b2c