Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery

McIntosh, Caroline and Thomson, C.E. (2006) Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery. Journal of wound care, 15 (3). pp. 133-136. ISSN 0969-0700

[img] PDF
Download (95kB)

Abstract

Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that certain honey dressings have a positive effect on wound
healing. However, there is limited empirical evidence supporting its use. This double-blind randomised
controlled trial investigated the effect of a honey dressing on wound healing following toenail surgery
with matrix phenolisation.

Method: Participants (n=100) were randomly assigned to receive either an active manuka honey
dressing (n=52) or paraffi n-impregnated tulle gras (n=48). The primary outcome was time (days) taken
for complete re-epithelialisation of the nail bed.

Results: Mean healing times were 40.30 days (SD 18.21) for the honey group and 39.98 days
(SD 25.42) for the paraffi n tulle gras group. Partial avulsion wounds healed statistically signifi cantly faster
(p=0.01) with paraffi n tulle gras (19.62 days, SD 9.31) than with the honey dressing (31.76 days, SD 18.8),
but no signifi cant difference (p=0.21) was found following total avulsion when comparing honey (45.28
days, SD 18.03.) with paraffi n tulle gras dressings (52.03 days, SD 21.3).

Conclusion: The results suggest that patients may benefi t more from paraffi n tulle gras dressings than
honey dressings following partial toenail avulsion. No statistically signifi cant difference was found for
healing times after total toenail avulsion, although the marginal benefit of the honey dressing on these
healing times warrants further investigation.

Declaration of interest: None.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Reproduced by permission of Journal of Wound Care, published by Journal of Wound Care. © Journal of Wound Care
Uncontrolled Keywords: honey dressings; randomised controlled trial; toenail surgery; wound healing
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RD Surgery
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
References: 1 Molan, P., Betts, J. Using honey dressings: the practical considerations. Nurs Times 2000; 96: 49, 36-37. 2 Molan, P. Treatment of wounds and burns with honey. Current Therapeutics 2001; 42: 9, 33-39. 3 Marshall, C. The use of honey in wound care: a review article. Br J Pod 2002; 5: 2, 47-49. 4 Molan, P. The role of honey in the management of wounds. J Wound Care 1999; 8: 415-418. 5 Thomson, C.E., Paterson- Brown, S., Russell, I.T., Russell, D. A clinical and economical evaluation of toenail surgery performed by podiatrists in the community and surgeons in the hospital setting: a randomised controlled trial, 2002. Conference proceedings of the 1st International Allied Health Professions: Impacting on World Health, Edinburgh. 6 King, B. Pain at fi rst dressing change after toenail avulsion: the experience of nurses, patients and an observer: 1 J Wound Care 2003; 12: 1: 5-10. 7 Subrahmanyam, M. Honey impregnated gauze versus polyurethane fi lm (Opsite) in the treatment of burns; a prospective randomised study. Br J Sur 1993; 46: 4, 322-323. 8 Subrahmanyam, M. A prospective randomised clinical and histological study of superfi cial burn wound healing with honey and silver sulfadiazine. Burns 1998; 24: 2: 157-161. 9 Al-Waili, N.S., Saloom, K.Y. Effects of topical honey on post-operative wound infections due to Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria following caesarean section and hysterectomies. Eur J Med Res 1999; 4: 3, 126-130. 10 Subrahmanyam, M. Honey dressing versus boiled potato peel in the treatment of burns: a prospective randomised study. Burns 1996; 22: 6, 491-493. 11 Subrahmanyam, M. Honey-impregnated gauze versus amniotic membrane in the treatment of burns. Burns 1994; 20: 331-333. 12 Frankel, S., Robinson, G., Berenbaum, M.R. Antioxidant capacity and correlated characteristics of 14 unifl oral honeys. J Apicultural Research 1998; 37: 1, 27-31. 13 Cooper, R.A., Molan, P.C. Honey in wound care. J Wound Care 1999; 8: 7, 340. 14 Moore, O.A., Smith, L.A. Campbell, F. et al. Systematic review of the use of honey as a wound dressing. BMC Compliment Altern Med 2001; 2: 1-8. 15 Marshall, C., Queen, J., Manjooran, J. Honey vs. povidone iodine following toenail surgery. Wounds UK 2005; 1: 1, 10-18. 16 Subrahmanyam, M. Topical application of honey in treatment of burns. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 497-498. 17 Subrahmanyam, M. Early tangential excision and skin grafting of moderate burns is superior to honey dressing: a prospective randomised trial. Burns 1999; 25: 6, 729-731. 18 Schwarzentraub, P.H., Raymond, G.A., Ball, M.J., Bizzoco, D.L. Foot ulcers: a 54-month retrospective study. J Foot Surg 1991; 30: 5, 437-442.
Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 05 Apr 2007
Last Modified: 29 Mar 2018 09:01
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/164

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©