Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery

McIntosh, Caroline and Thomson, C.E. (2006) Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery. Journal of wound care, 15 (3). pp. 133-136. ISSN 0969-0700

[img] PDF
Download (95kB)


Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that certain honey dressings have a positive effect on wound
healing. However, there is limited empirical evidence supporting its use. This double-blind randomised
controlled trial investigated the effect of a honey dressing on wound healing following toenail surgery
with matrix phenolisation.

Method: Participants (n=100) were randomly assigned to receive either an active manuka honey
dressing (n=52) or paraffi n-impregnated tulle gras (n=48). The primary outcome was time (days) taken
for complete re-epithelialisation of the nail bed.

Results: Mean healing times were 40.30 days (SD 18.21) for the honey group and 39.98 days
(SD 25.42) for the paraffi n tulle gras group. Partial avulsion wounds healed statistically signifi cantly faster
(p=0.01) with paraffi n tulle gras (19.62 days, SD 9.31) than with the honey dressing (31.76 days, SD 18.8),
but no signifi cant difference (p=0.21) was found following total avulsion when comparing honey (45.28
days, SD 18.03.) with paraffi n tulle gras dressings (52.03 days, SD 21.3).

Conclusion: The results suggest that patients may benefi t more from paraffi n tulle gras dressings than
honey dressings following partial toenail avulsion. No statistically signifi cant difference was found for
healing times after total toenail avulsion, although the marginal benefit of the honey dressing on these
healing times warrants further investigation.

Declaration of interest: None.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Reproduced by permission of Journal of Wound Care, published by Journal of Wound Care. © Journal of Wound Care
Uncontrolled Keywords: honey dressings; randomised controlled trial; toenail surgery; wound healing
Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RD Surgery
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences

1 Molan, P., Betts, J. Using
honey dressings: the
practical considerations.
Nurs Times 2000; 96: 49,
2 Molan, P. Treatment of
wounds and burns with
honey. Current
Therapeutics 2001; 42: 9,
3 Marshall, C. The use of
honey in wound care: a
review article. Br J Pod
2002; 5: 2, 47-49.
4 Molan, P. The role of
honey in the management
of wounds. J Wound Care
1999; 8: 415-418.
5 Thomson, C.E., Paterson-
Brown, S., Russell, I.T.,
Russell, D. A clinical and
economical evaluation of
toenail surgery performed
by podiatrists in the
community and surgeons in
the hospital setting: a
randomised controlled trial,
2002. Conference
proceedings of the 1st
International Allied Health
Professions: Impacting on
World Health, Edinburgh.
6 King, B. Pain at fi rst
dressing change after
toenail avulsion: the
experience of nurses,
patients and an observer: 1
J Wound Care 2003; 12: 1:
7 Subrahmanyam, M. Honey
impregnated gauze versus
polyurethane fi lm (Opsite)
in the treatment of burns; a
prospective randomised
study. Br J Sur 1993; 46: 4,
8 Subrahmanyam, M. A
prospective randomised
clinical and histological
study of superfi cial burn
wound healing with honey
and silver sulfadiazine.
Burns 1998; 24: 2: 157-161.
9 Al-Waili, N.S., Saloom,
K.Y. Effects of topical
honey on post-operative
wound infections due to
Gram positive and Gram
negative bacteria following
caesarean section and
hysterectomies. Eur J Med
Res 1999; 4: 3, 126-130.
10 Subrahmanyam, M.
Honey dressing versus
boiled potato peel in the
treatment of burns: a
prospective randomised
study. Burns 1996; 22: 6,
11 Subrahmanyam, M.
Honey-impregnated gauze
versus amniotic membrane
in the treatment of burns.
Burns 1994; 20: 331-333.
12 Frankel, S., Robinson, G.,
Berenbaum, M.R.
Antioxidant capacity and
correlated characteristics
of 14 unifl oral honeys. J
Apicultural Research 1998;
37: 1, 27-31.
13 Cooper, R.A., Molan,
P.C. Honey in wound care. J
Wound Care 1999; 8: 7,
14 Moore, O.A., Smith, L.A.
Campbell, F. et al.
Systematic review of the
use of honey as a wound
dressing. BMC Compliment
Altern Med 2001; 2: 1-8.
15 Marshall, C., Queen, J.,
Manjooran, J. Honey vs.
povidone iodine following
toenail surgery. Wounds
UK 2005; 1: 1, 10-18.
16 Subrahmanyam, M.
Topical application of honey
in treatment of burns. Br J
Surg 1991; 78: 497-498.
17 Subrahmanyam, M. Early
tangential excision and skin
grafting of moderate burns
is superior to honey
dressing: a prospective
randomised trial. Burns
1999; 25: 6, 729-731.
18 Schwarzentraub, P.H.,
Raymond, G.A., Ball, M.J.,
Bizzoco, D.L. Foot ulcers: a
54-month retrospective
study. J Foot Surg 1991; 30:
5, 437-442.

Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 05 Apr 2007
Last Modified: 11 Dec 2016 15:04


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©