Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

A critical ethnographic approach to facilitating cultural shift in midwifery

Hughes, Deborah, Deery, Ruth and Lovatt, Alison (2002) A critical ethnographic approach to facilitating cultural shift in midwifery. Midwifery, 18 (1). pp. 43-52. ISSN 0266-6138

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (145kB)

Abstract

Objective: to improve understanding of local midwifery morale, inform development and reorganisation of a maternity unit, and enhance midwifery involvement in strategic planning.

Participants: a randomised stratified sample of 20 midwives working in a UK National Health Service (NHS) hospital and its surrounding community area.

Method: within a critical ethnographic framework, focus groups were tape-recorded and transcribed, and analysed using a thematic content analysis approach.

Findings: key areas affecting midwifery morale were identified, in particular staffing levels, working relationships and organisational issues. One year later, despite many changes having taken place, midwifery morale was still low but participants were more politically analytical of, and actively involved in changing their situation. The findings of the study indicate that there are complex and long-standing cultural inhibitions to the effective development of midwifery care but, if these are made explicit through a planned collaborative process, such as in this study, a process of cultural shift can be seen to begin.

Implications for practice: focus groups can be a useful tool in moving midwifery culture forward within a local context.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: "Reprinted from Midwifery, Vol 18 No 1, Hughes Deery Lovatt, A critical ethnographic, 43-52., Copyright (2002), with permission from Elsevier." © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.
Uncontrolled Keywords: midwifery maternity strategic planning midwives NHS
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Childhood Studies
References: Burnard P 1991 A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today 11: 464–466 Deery R 1999 Improving relationships through clinical supervision: 2. British Journal of Midwifery 7(4): 160–163 Deery R, Hughes D, Lovatt A et al. 1999 ‘Hearing midwives’ views’: focus groups on maternity care in Calderdale NHS Trust. Unpublished report, Primary Care Research Group, University of Huddersfield Deery R, Hughes D, Lovatt A 2000 ‘Quite a healthy exercise’: follow-up focus groups on maternity care in Calderdale NHS Trust. Unpublished report, Primary Care Research Group, University of Huddersfield Demilew J 1996 ‘Independent midwives’ views of supervision. In: Kirkham M (Ed) Supervision of Midwives. Books for Midwives Press, Hale DoH 1993 Changing Childbirth: report of the expert maternity group. Department of Health, London DoH 1997 The new NHS: modern, dependable. Department of Health, London DoH 1999 Making a difference. Department of Health, London Ely M, Anzul M, Friedman T et al. 1991 Doing qualitative research: circles within circles. The Falmer Press, London Grbich C 1999 Qualitative research in health. Sage Publications, London Green J, Hart L 1999 The impact of context on data. In: Barbour R.S, Kitzinger J (Eds) Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. Sage Publications, London Hammersley M, Atkinson P 1995 Ethnography: principles in practice, second edition. Routledge, London Hunt S, Symonds A 1995 The social meaning of midwifery. Macmillan Press, Basingstoke Jordan S, Yeomans D 1995 Critical ethnography: problems in contemporary theory and practice. British Journal of Sociology and Education 16(3): 389–408 Kent J 2000 Social perspectives on pregnancy and childbirth for midwives, nurses and the caring professions. Open University Press, Buckingham KirkhamM1999 The culture of midwifery in the National Health Service in England. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30(3): 732–739 Kirkham M, Stapleton H 2000 Midwives’ support needs as childbirth changes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 (2): 465-472 Kitzinger J Barbour RS 1999 Introduction: the challenge and promise of focus group. In: Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. Barbour R S Kitzinger J (Eds) Sage Publications, London Leap N 1997 Making sense of ‘horizontal violence’ in midwifery. British Journal of Midwifery 5(11): 698 Maguire P 2001 Uneven ground: feminisms and action research. In: Reason P Bradbury H (Eds) Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Sage Publications, London Marcus G 1994 What comes (just) after ‘post’? The case of ethnography. In: Denzin N Lincoln Y (Eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications, London. Morse JM Field PA 1996 Nursing research: the application of qualitative approaches, Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd., Cheltenham NHSE (1998) A consultation on a strategy for nursing, midwifery & health visiting. NHS Executive, Leeds Oakley A 1981 Interviewing women: a contradiction in terms. In: Roberts H (Ed) Doing feminist research. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London Reed J 1995 Practitioner knowledge in practitioner research. In: Reed J, Proctor S (Eds) Practitioner research in health care: the inside story. Chapman & Hall, London Reed J Biott, C 1995 Evaluating and developing practitioner research. In: Reed J, Proctor S (Eds) Practitioner research in health care: the inside story. Chapman & Hall, London Stapleton H, Duerden J, Kirkham M 1998 Evaluation of the impact of the supervision of midwives on professional practice and the quality of midwifery care. An ENB and UKCC commissioned project. University of Sheffield Twinn S 2000 The analysis of focus group data: a challenge to the rigour of qualitative research. Nursing Times Research 3 (2): 140–147 Weitz R 1987 English midwives and the association of radical midwives. Women & Health 12(1): 79–89 Wilkinson S 1999 How useful are focus group in feminist research? In: Barbour RS, Kitzinger J (Eds) Developing focus group research: politics, theory and practice. Sage Publications, London
Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 05 Apr 2007
Last Modified: 29 Mar 2018 10:01
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/163

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©