Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Protecting the environment: the role of environmental management systems

Watson, Michael (2006) Protecting the environment: the role of environmental management systems. Journal of the Royal Society for the promotion of health, 126 (6). pp. 280-284. ISSN 1466-4240

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (532kB)

Abstract

Environmental management and auditing systems are increasingly important. They have
significant roles to play in relation to environmental protection, workplace safety and public
health. Businesses and non-commercial organisations adopt such systems for a variety of
reasons. The extent to which they are used varies very considerably between developed
countries. The effectiveness of national regulatory systems seems to be a major factor. In the
United Kingdom environmental regulators have traditionally sought the voluntary compliance
of businesses. This strategy is closely associated with the near absence of administrative
penalties. It seems that a wide range of environmental administrative penalties will be
introduced in the near future. This may greatly encourage more firms to introduce
environmental management and auditing systems.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2006 Royal Society for the Promotion of Health.
Uncontrolled Keywords: Administrative penalties; EMAS; environmental management systems; environmental regulation;
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography
G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
Schools: Huddersfield Business School
References: 1. Palmisano J. Environmental auditing: past, present and future. Environmental Auditor 1989; 1(1): 7–20. 2. Morrow D, and Rondinelli D, Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivation and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS certification. European Management Journal 2002, 20(2): 159–171. 3. EMAS 2 opens for business. Report 316, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2001, 6. Freimann J and Walther M. The impacts of corporate environmental management systems: a comparison of EMAS and ISO 14001. Greener Management International, 2001; 36: 91–103. 4. Jiang R.J and Bansal P. Seeing the Need for ISO 14001. Journal of Management Studies 2003; 40(4): 1047–1067, at 1048. 5. ISO (2004), Survey of ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 certificates 2003, 6–27; available online: http://www.iso.org/iso/en/iso9000- 14000/pdf/survey2003.pdf (accessed 20 February 2005). 6. European Union, EU register of EMAS organisations; available online: http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/ emas/about/participate/sites_en.htm (accessed 25 February 2005). 7. Glachant M, Schucht S, Bültmann A and Wätzold F. Companies’ participation in EMAS: the influence of the public regulator. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2002; 11: 254–266; Kollman, K and Prakash, A. EMSbased environmental regimes as club goods: examining variations in firm-level adoption of ISO 14001 and EMAS in UK, US and Germany. Policy Sciences 2002; 35: 43–67;Watson, M. and Emery, ART Law, economics and the environment: a comparative study of environmental management systems. Managerial Auditing Journal, 2004; 19(6): 760–773. 8. Wurzel RKW, Jordan A, Zito AR and Bruckner L. From high regulatory state to social and ecological market economy? New environmental policy instruments in Germany, Environmental Politics, 2003; 12(1): 115–136, at 132. 9. Civil penalties are generally determined by regulatory bodies (which have considerable discretion).Administrative penalties usually take the form of fixed fines (such as those currently available to punish individuals who cause excessive noise).Ogus A and Abbot C. Sanctions for pollution; do we have the right regime?. Journal of Environmental Law, 2002, 13(3): 283–298;Woods M and and Macrory R, Environmental Civil Penalties: A More Proportionate Response to Regulatory Breach: Centre for Law and the Environment, University College London, 2003, 4.5-4.12; Malek T,Heinelt H, Taeger J and Töller AE. The implementation of EMAS in Germany. In Heinelt H,Malek T, Smith R and Töller A.E., editors, European Union Policy and New Forms of Governance.Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001. pp. 107–118. 10. House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, Environmental Crime and the Courts, HC 126. Sixth Report, 2004; House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee (2005), Second Report, Corporate Environmental Crime, HC 136. Second Report, 2005. 11. Pollution fears follow Buncefield fuel depot fire, Report 371, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2005, 6–7; Sample, I. Toxic legacy poses giant problem. Guardian 2001, 7 February. 12. ‘French disaster opens new chapter in EU major hazards policy’, Report 321, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2001, 47. 13. In addition to causing accidents and respiratory diseases such as bronchitis, smoke and smog blocked sunlight – especially in winter. See Clapp BW. An Environmental History of Britain since the Industrial Revolution. First edition. London: Pearson, 1994, 43–69. 14. Researchers find new link between air pollution and heart disease. Report 361, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2005, 10–11. 15. SMEs’ “head in the sand” attitude to environment. Report 336, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2003, 6. 16. Hutter, BM, editor, A Reader in Environmental Law. First edition. Oxford; Oxford University Press, 1999, 5. 17. Watson M. The enforcement of environmental law: civil or criminal penalties? Environmental Law and Management, 2005; 7(1): 12–16. 18. Abbot C. Friend or foe? Strict liability in English environmental licensing regimes. Environmental Law and Management, 2004; 16(2): 67–76. 19. De Prez P. Excuses, excuses: the ritual trivialisation of environmental prosecutions. Journal of Environmental Law, 2000; 12: 65–77. 20. Finemen S. Enforcing the environment: regulatory realities. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2000; 9(1): 62–72, at 67. 21. Hutter BM, The Reasonable Arm of the Law: The Law Enforcement Procedures of Environmental Health Officers. First edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988, 55, 63. 22. Ibid., 72. 23. Woods and Macrory, note 9 above, 7.4–7.5. 24. Dupont C and Zakkour P. Trends in Environmental Sentencing in England and Wales, Environmental Resources Management (ERM) Ltd, 2003. 25. Malcolm J. Prosecuting for environmental crime: does crime pay? Environmental Law and Management, 2002; 14(5): 289–295; Watson M. Offences against the environment: the economics of crime and punishment. Environmental Law and Management, 2004; 16(4): 200–204. 26. Woods and Macrory, note 9 above, Appendix B. 27. Harvey F. Environment criminals face tougher fines, Financial Times, 2004, 29 November. See also Clover C. ‘Pledge to decriminalise environmental offences’, Daily Telegraph, 2004, 29 November. 28. ‘Post-election agenda on environmental justice takes shape’, Report 359, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2004, 27–31, at 28–30. 29. ‘Review seeks alternatives to criminal prosecutions’, Report 372, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2006. 30. Cane P.Are Environmental Harms Special?, Journal of Environmental Law, 13(1): 3–20, at 7. 31. The availability of resources is another matter. See Squeeze on Agency funds could jeopardise civil penalties regime, Report 361, Environmental Data Services (ENDS), London, 2005, 37. 32. There is perhaps a need for an ‘evidentiary privilege’ that would give forms limited legal protection if they acknowledged environmental shortcomings in published reports. This is an important issue in litigious societies such as the U.S.A. See Bhur, N and Freedman M. Culture, institutional factors and differences in environmental disclosure between Canada and the United States. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2001; 12: 293–322; Koven L, The environmental self-audit evidentiary privilege, UCLA Law Review, 1998; 45(5): 1166–2000.
Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 22 Mar 2007
Last Modified: 29 Mar 2018 09:45
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/155

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©