Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Moving from Make/Buy to strategic sourcing: the outsource decision process

Drury, Colin and Tayles, M. (2001) Moving from Make/Buy to strategic sourcing: the outsource decision process. Long range planning, 34 (5). pp. 605-622. ISSN 0024-6301

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (173kB)


Companies are paying increasing attention to outsourcing components and processes. In most of today's business environments the decision to outsource has many ramifications, not least the impact on capital budgets. On the one hand, the decision to outsource releases capital that can be used elsewhere. On the other, the decision to continue in-house keeps open strategic options for the product in question, but has knock-on effects due to the reduction in capital. However most companies separate the process of making capital allocations from the purchasing function. This paper examines how one company moved to a position where purchasing was integrated with top functions, especially capital budgeting. It achieved this by working off the strategic sourcing model described in this paper.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: UoA 35 (Accounting and Finance) © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
H Social Sciences > HG Finance
Schools: Huddersfield Business School
Huddersfield Business School > Financial Ethics and Governance Research Group
Related URLs:
References: 1. C. Drury, S. Braund, P. Osborne and M. Tayles, A Survey of Management Accounting Practices in UK Manufacturing Companies, Chartered Association of Certified Accountants (1993). F. B. Green and F. E. Amenkhienan, Accounting innovations: a cross sectional survey of manufacturing firms, Journal of Cost Management for the Manufacturing Industry (Spring) (1992). K. Lukka and M. Granlund, Cost accounting in Finland: current practice and trends of development, The European Accounting Review 5(1), 1–28 (1996). M. P. Joye and P. J. Blayney, Cost and management accounting practice in Australian manufacturing companies: survey results, Monograph No. 7, University of Sydney (1990). M. Kerremans, H. Theunisse and G. Van Overloop, The impact of automation and cost accounting, Accounting and Business Research (Spring), 147–155 (1991). 2. W. Seal, J. Cullen, D. Dunlop, T. Berry and M. Ahmed, Enacting a European supply chain: a case study on the role of management accounting, Management Accounting Research 10(3), 303–322 (1999). 3. R. Venkatesan, Strategic sourcing: to make or not to make, Harvard Business Review (November/December), 98–107 (1992). 4. J. W. Culliton, Make or but: a consideration of the problems fundamental to a decision whether to manufacture or buy materials, accessory equipment, fabricating parts and suppliers, Harvard University Research (1956). 5. A. J. Gambino, The make-or-buy decision, National Association of Accountants and The Society of Management Accountants Canada (1980). 6. D. Ford, B. Cotton, D. Farmer, H. Gross and I. Wilkinson, Make or buy decisions and their implications, Industrial Marketing Management 22, 207–214 (1993). D. Ford and D. Farmer, Make or buy—a key strategic issue, LRP 19, 54– 62 (1986). 7. Ford et al. (1993) (see Reference 6). 8. M. Alexander and D. Young, Strategic outsourcing, LRP 29(1), 116–119 (1996). R. Mullin, Managing the outsourced enterprise, Journal of Business Strategy (Jul/Aug), 28–32 (1996). 9. C. K. Prahalad and G. Hamel, The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review (May–June) (1990). J. C. Collins and J. I. Poris, Building your company’s vision, Harvard Business Review (Sept/Oct), 65–77 (1996). 10. J. B. Quinn and F. G. Hilmer, Strategic outsourcing, Sloan Management Review (Summer), 43–55 (1994). 11. Ibid, p. 52. 12. M. Tayles and C. Drury, New manufacturing technologies and management accounting systems: some evidence of the perceptions of UK management accounting practitioners, International Journal of Production Economics 36, 1–17 (1994). C. Drury, Management and Cost Accounting, International Thompson Learning (2000). 13. R. S. Kaplan, Must CIM be justified by faith alone?, Harvard Business Review (Mar/Apr), 87–95 (1986). 14. J. Finnie, The role of financial appraisals in decisions to acquire AMT, Accounting and Business Research 18, 133– 139 (1988). 15. S. S. M. Ho and R. H. Pike, Adoption of probablistic risk analysis in capital budgeting and corporate investment, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 19(3), 387–405 (1992). 16. E. P. Hibbert, Global make-or-buy decisions, Industrial Marketing Management 22, 67–77 (1993). 17. G. Motteram and J. Sizer, Evaluating and controlling investments in advanced manufacturing technology, Management Accounting 70(1), 26–30 (1992). 18. D. R. Krause, R. B. Handfield and T. V. Scannell, Reactive and strategic processes, Journal of Operations Management 17(1), 39–58 (1998). 19. Ford et al. (1986) (see Reference 6, p. 212). 20. It is the intention of the paper that the company is not identified or identifiable from the material presented. While managers were willing to co-operate with the research in the interests of their systems development, the company’s policy is not to be associated with any particular published material and the researchers wish to respect this totally. Some may say that failure to identify the company is problematic, but the opposite position also applies. While the company is totally anonymous a balanced and critical view of the organisation policies, procedures and practices can be reported, both positive and negative points can be covered.
Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 22 Feb 2007
Last Modified: 28 Aug 2021 23:37


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©