<mods:mods version="3.3" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>Increasing response rates to lifestyle surveys: a review of methodology and 'good practice'.</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Serena</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">McCluskey</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Annie</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Topping</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Background&#13;
Lifestyle surveys are traditionally used for collecting detailed population information about&#13;
individual behaviours that impact on health. However, declining response rates and the&#13;
under-representation of certain population groups in lifestyle survey data has led to&#13;
uncertainty over the accuracy of any findings. In order to maximise response rates, a&#13;
mixed-methods approach is now recommended. This review was carried out in order to&#13;
examine the methodological literature related to the administration of lifestyle surveys and&#13;
the implications for response rates. It was envisaged that the results of this review could&#13;
provide a valuable resource for those involved in undertaking lifestyle surveys.&#13;
Methods&#13;
A review of the empirical evidence and published literature on the methodological&#13;
considerations associated with administration of lifestyle surveys, specifically in relation to&#13;
maximising response rates, was carried out. A search for ‘grey literature’ was also&#13;
conducted using the internet, and citation tracking was performed on all retrieved articles.&#13;
A request for examples of relevant lifestyle survey work, particularly those incorporating&#13;
mixed-methods designs and/or strategies to increase response rates, was distributed to&#13;
several Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) across England. The responses are illustrated as&#13;
‘good practice’ case studies.&#13;
Results&#13;
The postal questionnaire remains an important lifestyle survey tool, but response rates&#13;
have decreased rapidly in recent years. Interviews and telephone surveys are&#13;
recommended in order to supplement data from postal questionnaires to overcome any&#13;
literacy and language barriers. These approaches are advocated to increase response&#13;
rates in some population groups, but costs may be prohibitive. Electronic surveys are a&#13;
cheaper alternative, but the evidence seems to suggest that the use of the internet does&#13;
not appear to increase overall response rates to surveys. Evidence on the use of&#13;
incentives suggests they can be effective at increasing response rates, but only if their use&#13;
is tailored to the design of the survey and to the characteristics of target populations.&#13;
Conclusions&#13;
The empirical evidence was not robust enough to make definitive recommendations, but&#13;
information from the published literature, along with examples of ‘good practice’ in lifestyle&#13;
survey work suggests that supplementing, or offering different survey modes, alongside&#13;
targeted maximisation strategies can increase coverage and also, with careful planning,&#13;
can prove to be cost-effective.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">H Social Sciences (General)</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8061">2009-09</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>University of Huddersfield</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Monograph</mods:genre></mods:mods>