Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Objective Measurement of Music Quality Using Inter-Band Relationship Analysis

Fenton, Steven, Wakefield, Jonathan P. and Fazenda, Bruno (2011) Objective Measurement of Music Quality Using Inter-Band Relationship Analysis. In: 130th Audio Engineering Society AES Convention, 13-16 May 2011, London, UK.

Metadata only available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper describes and evaluates an objective measurement that grades the quality of a complex musical signal. The authors have previously identified a potential correlation between inter-band dynamics and the subjective quality of produced music excerpts. This paper describes the previously presented Inter-Band Relationship (IBR) descriptor and extends this work by conducting more thorough testing with real-world music excerpts and a greater number of listening subjects. A high degree of correlation is observed between the Mean Subject Scores (MSS) and the objective IBR descriptor suggesting it could be used as an additional model output variable (MOV) to describe produced music quality. The method lends itself to real-time implementation and therefore can be exploited within mixing, mastering and monitoring tools.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Contributors:
ContributionNameEmail
AuthorFenton, Stevens.m.fenton@hud.ac.uk
AuthorWakefield, Jonathan P.j.p.wakefield@hud.ac.uk
AuthorFazenda, Brunob.fazenda@hud.ac.uk
Uncontrolled Keywords: Objective Quality Measurment of Produced Music
Subjects: M Music and Books on Music > M Music
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
T Technology > TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering
Schools: School of Computing and Engineering
School of Computing and Engineering > Music Technology and Production Research Group
Related URLs:
References:

1. Feaster P, “Edouard-Leon Scott de Martinville’s – Principes De Phonoautographie (1857)” , Firstsounds.org, U.S.A. (2008) [Accessed 12th September, 2009]
2. S.Bech and N.Zacharov, Perceptual audio evaluation, theory, method and application, J.Wiley, Chichester, 2006
3. G. Stoll, F.Kozamernik, EBU listening tests on internet audio codecs, EBU Technical Review, 2000
4. D.Marston and A.Mason, Cascaded audio coding, EBU Technical Review 304, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994
5. ITU-R BS.1116-1, Methods for the subjective assessment of audio systems including multichannel sound systems, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1994
6. ITU-R BS.1534-1, Method for the subjective assessment of intermediate quality level of coding systems, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003
7. ITU-T. P800, Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1990
8. S.Zielinski and F.Rumsey, On some biases encountered in modern audio quality listening tests-A Review, Journal AES Vol 56, No 6, June 2008.
9. ITU-R BS.1387-1, Method for objective measurement of perceived audio quality’, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1998
10. ITU-R BS.1770, Algorithms to measure audio programme loudness and true-peak audio level, International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006
11. E.Skovenborg and T.Lund, Loudness descriptors to characterize programs and music tracks, AES Convention paper 7514, October 2008
12. E.Skovenborg, and S.H.Nielsen, Evaluation of Different Loudness Models with Music and Speech Material 117th Convention, San Francisco, CA, USA , Oct 2004.
13. Loudness Wars, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war [Accessed 24th September, 2009]
14. Turn Me Up, http://www.turnmeup.org/ [Accessed 12th September, 2009]
15. E.Vincent, MUSHRAM 1.0, Centre for Digital Music, Queens Mary, University of London, November 2005.
16. ITU-R BS.1284-1, General methods for the subjective assessment of sound quality International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2003
17. AES-6id-2006, AES information document for digital audio – Personal computer audio quality measurements, Audio Engineering Society, Inc, 2006.
18. SQAM Test CD, Sound Quality Assessment Material, Recordings for subjective tests – Cat. No. 422 204-2, EBU 1988,2005.
19. Pleasurize Sound Foundation, http://www.dynamicrange.de/node/1 [Accessed 24th September, 2009]
20. S.Fenton, B.Fazenda & J.Wakefield, Objective Quality Measurement of Audio Using Dynamic Range Analysis, IOA-25 Conference paper, November 2009
21. AES-6id-2006, AES information document for digital audio – Personal computer audio quality measurements, Audio Engineering Society, Inc, 2006.
22. J.Villegas, M.Cohen, "Roughometer": Realtime Roughness Calculation and Profiling 125th Convention, Convention Paper 7516, Audio Engineering Society,San Francisco, CA, USA, October 2008.
23. J.Boley, M.Lester, C.Danner, ”Measuring Dynamics: Comparing and Contrasting Algorithms for the Computation of Dynamic Range” 129th Convention, Convention Paper 8178, Audio Engineering Society,San Francisco, CA, USA, November 2010.
24. S.Ferguson, D.Cabrera, E.Schubert “ Comparing continuous subjective loudness responses and computational models of loudness for temporally varying sounds”, 129th Convention, Convention Paper 8177, Audio Engineering Society,San Francisco, CA, USA, November 2010.
25. Moore, B.C.J., Glasberg, B.R. & Stone, M.A "Why Are Commercials so Loud? -- Perception and Modeling of the Loudness of Amplitude-Compressed Speech", Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol.51:12, 2003

Depositing User: Steven Fenton
Date Deposited: 17 Mar 2011 10:18
Last Modified: 26 May 2015 13:54
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/9851

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©