Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a guided self-help intervention versus a waiting list control in a routine primary care mental health service

Lucock, Mike, Kirby, Rebecca and Wainwright, Nigel (2011) A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a guided self-help intervention versus a waiting list control in a routine primary care mental health service. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50 (3). pp. 298-309. ISSN 0144-6657

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (196kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Objectives To evaluate the effectiveness of a two session guided self-help (GSH) intervention provided by primary care graduate mental health workers (PCGMHWs) in a primary care mental health service. Design Pragmatic randomized trial, with a wait list control design. Method Patients presenting with significant anxiety and depression problems were given one or more self-help booklets at screening and randomly allocated to an immediate (ITG) or delayed treatment group (DTG). Following this, a two-session GSH intervention was provided by one of two PCGMHWs, with a review session to decide on the need for further intervention. The DTG began the intervention 8 weeks after the screening and the primary outcome was Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation – Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) scores after 8 weeks. Results A total of 63 patients were allocated to the ITG, 59 to the DTG. Analysis of covariance, carried out on an intention to treat basis, showed a significant treatment effect, F(1,98)=15, p<.001, and a comparison of means at 8 weeks showed a significant difference, t (116)=2.1 (95% CI [1.1, 5.9]), p=.042 with an effect size, d=0.375. Taking the two groups together, CORE-OM scores for patients who completed the intervention reduced between screening and the review session by an average of 7.9 (95% CI [6.3, 9.5]), effect size of 1.2. Between screening and the review session, 47% showed a reliable and clinically significant improvement. Conclusions The study provides some support for the effectiveness of a two-session GSH intervention and a stepped-care service model.

    Item Type: Article
    Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Psychological Research
    Related URLs:
    Depositing User: Sharon Beastall
    Date Deposited: 10 Nov 2010 13:32
    Last Modified: 03 Jun 2014 16:42
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/9016

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©