Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Human-computer interaction: from classifying users to classifying users' misunderstandings

Booth, Paul Andrew (1989) Human-computer interaction: from classifying users to classifying users' misunderstandings. Doctoral thesis, University of Huddersfield.

[img]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Version
Download (26MB) | Preview

    Abstract

    The overall objective of the research has been to address the question of how best to
    understand user behaviour at the interface. The use of cognitive grammars to analyse
    tasks and predict behaviour was rejected for seven theoretical and practical reasons.
    Following this, cognitive style measures were rejected as a result the first study, where
    the visualizer-verbalizer and conceptual tempoc ognitive style measures were not found
    to be accurate predictors of behaviour at a task. The results of this experiment indicated
    that interaction between a system and its user has certain dynamic qualities that make
    prediction of a fixed set of activities in a set order difficult. Furthermore, it seemed
    likely that behaviour is determined by a potentially complex interaction of variables
    rather than any single over-riding factor, such as a user's cognitive style.
    Consequently, attention was-focused upon the errors that occur during humancomputerinteraction.
    An approach where errors are classified was -adopted, and a classification scheme was developed (ECM: an Evaluative Classification of Mismatch)as a vehicle for further research.
    An initial pilot study showed that user-system errors could be classified using the
    scheme. This suggested that the concepts it employed did have some validity in'both
    cognitive and computing domains. The second study of ECM involved a design team at
    Hewlett Packard's Office Products division in Wokingham. This study demonstrated
    that the classification scheme was - usable by a design and development team that
    consisted of software engineers, human factors engineers, and technical authors. The
    third and final study of ECM demonstrated that it could be, used to improve a design. A
    system, that had been changed using ECM, was shown to be significantly better, in
    terms of time, errors and user attitude ratings, than either its original or an iteration
    where ECM had not been employed.
    This research has provided strong indications that evaluative classifications can be
    of use within the design and development process. Furthermore, this work emphasizes
    the importance of providing structures for thinking about the user's problems that are
    divorced from the structure and terminology of design.

    Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
    Additional Information: EThOS Persistent ID uk.bl.ethos.236846
    Uncontrolled Keywords: Ergonomics Human engineering Computer software
    Subjects: Q Science > Q Science (General)
    Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
    Schools: School of Computing and Engineering
    Depositing User: Sharon Beastall
    Date Deposited: 22 Apr 2010 12:36
    Last Modified: 28 Jul 2010 19:55
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/7478

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©