Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Reasons for adopting different capacity levels in the denominator of overhead rates: a research note

Cowton, Christopher J., Drury, Colin and Brierley, J. (2006) Reasons for adopting different capacity levels in the denominator of overhead rates: a research note. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 4 (2). pp. 53-62.

[img] PDF
Download (141kB)


There has been criticism of the use of
budgeted capacity as the denominator of
overhead rates. Prior questionnaire-based
research has analysed which type of
capacity is used in the denominator of
overhead rates, but it has not assessed why
these capacity levels are used. This paper
uses grounded theory techniques to analyse
50 interviews with British management
accountants about why a particular
capacity level is used to determine the
denominator of overhead rates. The results
reveal that budgeted capacity is used
because the calculation of the denominator
is regarded as part of the budgeting
process. Practical capacity and normal
capacity are used to ensure that products
are not under or overcosted.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: 2005 Institute of Certified Management Accountants, All Rights Reserved.
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HG Finance
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD28 Management. Industrial Management
H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > HF5601 Accounting
Schools: The Business School
The Business School > Financial Ethics and Governance Research Group
Related URLs:

Alnestig, P. and Segerstedt, A. (1996),
“Product Costing in Ten Swedish
Manufacturing Companies”,
International Journal of Production
Economics, Vol. 46-47, pp. 441-457.
Brierley, J.A., Cowton, C.J. and Drury,
C. (2001), “Research into Product
Costing Practice: A European
Perspective”, European Accounting
Review, 10 (2), pp. 215-256.
Burns, J., Ezzamel, M. and Scapens, R.
(2003), The Challenge of Management
Accounting Change, Elsevier/CIMA,
Burns, J. and Scapens, R.W. (2000),
“Conceptualizing Management
Accounting Change: An Institutional
Framework”, Management Accounting
Research, 11(1), pp. 3-25.
Chiu, J. and Lee, Y. (1980), “A Survey
of Current Practice in Overhead
Accounting and Analysis”, in
Whittington, O.R. (ed.), Proceedings of
the 1980 Western Region Meeting of the
American Accounting Association.
Clarke, P.J. (1992), “Management
Accounting Practices in Irish
Manufacturing Businesses: A Pilot
Study”, Proceedings of the Annual
Conference 1992, The Irish Accounting
and Finance Association, pp. 17-34.
Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R.S. (1991),
The Design of Cost Management
Systems: Text, Cases and Readings,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
Cooper, R. and Kaplan, R.S. (1992),
“Activity-based Systems: Measuring the
Costs of Resource Usage”, Accounting
Horizons, 6 (1), pp. 1-13. DeBruine, M. and Sopariwala, P.R.
(1994), “The Use of Practical Capacity
for Better Management Decisions”,
Journal of Cost Management, 8 (1), pp.
Dilton-Hill, K.G. and Glad, E. (1994),
“Managing Capacity”, Journal of Cost
Management, 8 (1), pp. 32-39.
Drury, C. (2004), Management and
Cost Accounting, 6th edition, Thomson
Publishing, London.
Drury, C., Braund, S., Osborne, P. and
Tayles, M. (1993), A Survey of
Management Accounting Practices in
UK Manufacturing Companies,
Chartered Association of Certified
Accountants, London.
Drury, C. and Tayles, M. (1994),
“Product Costing in UK Manufacturing
Organizations”, European Accounting
Review, 3 (3), pp. 443-469.
Drury, C. and Tayles, M. (1995),
“Issues Arising from Surveys of
Management Accounting Practice”,
Management Accounting Research, 6
(3) pp. 267-280.
Hopwood, A.G. (1983), “On Trying to
Study Accounting in the Contexts in
which it Operates”, Accounting,
Organizations and Society, 8 (3) pp.
Horngren, C.T., Bhimani, A., Dater,
S.M. and Foster, G. (2002),
Management and Cost Accounting, 2nd
edition, Financial Times/Prentice Hall,
Harlow, Essex.
Lamminmaki, D. and Drury, C. (2001),
“A Comparison of New Zealand and
British Product Costing Practices”,
International Journal of Accounting, 36
(3), pp. 329-347.
Maguire, W. and Heath, D. (1997),
“Capacity Management for Continuous
Improvement”, Journal of Cost
Management, 11 (1), pp. 26-31.
McNair, C.J. (1994), “The Hidden Costs
of Capacity”, Journal of Cost
Management, 8 (1), pp. 12-24.
Sopariwala, P.R. (1998), “Using
Practical Capacity for Determining
Fixed Overhead Rates”, Journal of Cost
Management, 12 (5), pp. 34-40.
Sopariwala, P.R. (1999), “Measurement
of Theoretical Capacity a First Step to
Determining Practical Capacity”,
Journal of Cost Management, 13 (4),
pp. 35-40.
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998), Basics
of Qualitative Research: Grounded
Theory Procedures and Techniques, 2nd
edition, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Depositing User: Briony Heyhoe
Date Deposited: 15 May 2008 11:08
Last Modified: 20 Aug 2015 09:09


Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©