Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE-OM and HoNOS outcome measures at the interface between primary and secondary mental healthcare

Leach, Chris, Lucock, Mike, Barkham, Michael and Noble, Rachael (2005) Assessing risk and emotional disturbance using the CORE-OM and HoNOS outcome measures at the interface between primary and secondary mental healthcare. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29. pp. 419-422. ISSN 0955-6036

Metadata only available from this repository.

Abstract

AIMS AND METHOD

There is interest in how outcome measures routinely used in mental health settings compare with each other in assessing risk and emotional disturbance. The relation between the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation - Outcome Measure (CORE-OM), a client-completed measure, and the Health of the Nation Outcome Scale (HoNOS), a clinician-completed measure, was explored using data from 297 clients referred to secondary services by a primary care mental health liaison team.

RESULTS

The correlation between CORE-OM and HoNOS was 0.50, with cluster and factor analyses revealing overlap between the measures in assessing risk to self and others and general emotional issues.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Although the measures are typically used in different settings, the overlap suggests that both might be useful in any setting where assessment for mental health problems and risk is needed

Item Type: Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Psychological Research
Related URLs:
References:

AUDIN, K., MARGISON, F. R., MELLOR CLARK, J., et al (2001) Value of HoNOS in assessing patient change in NHS psychotherapy and psychological treatment services. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 561 -566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BARKHAM, M., MARGISON, F., LEACH, C., et al (2001) Service profiling and outcomes benchmarking using the CORE-OM: towards practice-based evidence in the psychological therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 184 -196.[CrossRef][Medline]

BARKHAM, M., GILBERT, N., CONNELL, J., et al (2005) Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-Afor assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 239 -246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

BECK, A. T. & STEER, R. A. (1993) Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

ENDICOTT, J., SPITZER, R. L., FLEISS, J. L., et al (1976) The Global Assessment Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 766 -771.[Abstract]

EVANS, C., CONNELL, J., BARKHAM, M., et al (2002) Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51 -60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

FONAGY, P., MATTHEWS, R. & PILLING, S. (2004) The Mental Health Outcomes Measurement Initiative: Report from the Chair of the Outcomes Reference Group. London: National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health, Department of Health.

GOLDBERG, D. P. (1978) Manual of the General Health Questionnaire. Slough: NFER/Nelson.

KAZARIAN, S. S. & JOSEPH, L. W. (1994) A brief scale to help identify outpatients’ level of need for community support services. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 935 -937.

LEACH, C., LUCOCK, M., BARKHAM, M., et al (2005) Transforming between Beck Depression Inventory and CORE-OM scores in routine clinical practice. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, in press.

McCLELLAND, R., TRIMBLE, P., FOX, M. L., et al (1998) Validation of an outcome scale for use in adult psychiatric practice. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 9, 98 -105.

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH IN ENGLAND (2002) Outcome Measures for Routine Practicein Mental Health Services. London: NIMHE (http://83.223.102.91/archivepolicy/nsf.asp).

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MENTAL HEALTH IN ENGLAND (2004) Organising and Delivering Psychological Therapies. London: NIMHE.

ORRELL, M., YARD, P., HANDYSIDES, J., et al (1999) Validity and reliability of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales in psychiatric patients in the community. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 409 -412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

OVERALL, J. E. & GORHAM, D. R. (1962) The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799 -812.

OZER, D. J. (1985) Correlation and the coefficient of determination. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 307 -315.[CrossRef]

REES, A., RICHARDS, A. & SHAPIRO, D. A. (2004) Utility of the HoNOS in measuring change in a Community Mental Health Care population. Journal of Mental Health, 13, 295 -304.[CrossRef]

WARE, J. E. & SHERBOURNE, C. D. (1990) The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36): conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30, 473 -483.

WING, J. K., BEEVOR, A. S., CURTIS, R. H., et al (1998) Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): research and development. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 11-18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

WYKES, T. & STURT, E. (1986) The measurement of social behaviour in psychiatric patients: an assessment of the reliability and validity of the SBS schedule. British Journal of Psychiatry, 148, 1 -11.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2008 11:27
Last Modified: 21 Dec 2010 15:35
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/691

Item control for Repository Staff only:

View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©