Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Ideology and ministerial allocation in the Major government 1992–1997

Heppell, Timothy (2005) Ideology and ministerial allocation in the Major government 1992–1997. Politics, 25 (3). pp. 144-152. ISSN 0263-3957

Metadata only available from this repository.

Abstract

This article evaluates the allocation of ministerial portfolios according to ideological disposition within the Major government of 1992–1997. By examining the ideological attitudes of Conservative parliamentarians towards three ideological variables – economic policy, European policy and social, sexual and moral policy – it will analyse the ideological balance of the government vis-à-vis the Parliamentary Conservative Party (PCP); the ideological disposition of those departing and entering government; and the ideological profile of the ministers appointed to the ‘key’ ministerial positions. The article will demonstrate the following: first, the Thatcherite ‘right’ were underrepresented at ministerial level, whilst the Tory ‘left’ secured a level of ministerial representation disproportionate to their numerical strength within the PCP; second, this was despite the fact that the process of ministerial appointments and departures gradually enhanced the representation of the Thatcherite ‘right’ of the PCP at the expense of the Tory ‘left’; and finally, the ‘perception’ amongst the Thatcherite ‘right’ was that they were being marginalised in terms of the key ministries of state.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Political Studies Association, 2005.
Uncontrolled Keywords: politics; government; John Major; ministerial allocation
Subjects: J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
Related URLs:
References:

Baker, D., A. Gamble and S. Ludlam ( 1992), ‘ More Classless and Less Thatcherite? Conservative Ministers and New Conservative MPs after the 1992 Election’, Parliamentary Affairs 45( 4), pp. 656– 668.
ISI, CSA
•Baker, D., A. Gamble and S. Ludlam ( 1993), ‘ Whips and Scorpions? Conservative MPs and the Maastricht Paving Motion Vote’, Parliamentary Affairs 46( 2), pp. 151– 166.
ISI, CSA
•Garry, J. ( 1995), ‘ The British Conservative Party: Divisions over European Policy’, West European Politics 18( 4), pp. 170– 189.
CSA
•Gove, M. ( 1995), Michael Portillo: The Future of the Right, London: Fourth Estate.
•Heppell, T. ( 2002), ‘ The Ideological Composition of the Parliamentary Conservative Party 1992–1997’, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 4( 2), pp. 299– 324.
Synergy, CSA
•Ludlam, S. ( 1996), ‘ The Sceptre Haunting Conservatism’ in S. Ludlam and M.J. Smith (eds.), Contemporary British Conservatism, London: Macmillan, pp. 98– 120.
•Major, J. ( 1999) John Major: The Autobiography, London: Harper Collins.
•Peele, G. ( 1997), ‘ The Political Parties’ in P. Dunleavy et al. (eds.), Developments in British Politics 5, London: St Martin's Press, pp. 89– 109.
•Smith, M.J. and S. Ludlam (eds.) ( 1996), ‘ Introduction’ in S. Ludlam and M.J. Smith (eds.), Contemporary British Conservatism, London: Macmillan, pp. 1– 18.
•Williams, H. ( 1998), Guilty Men: Conservative Decline and Fall 1992–1997, London: Hamish Hamilton

Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 25 Apr 2008 15:34
Last Modified: 13 Nov 2008 16:23
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/690

Item control for Repository Staff only:

View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©