Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

ACPO Alley-gating Guide 2005/06

Armitage, Rachel (2006) ACPO Alley-gating Guide 2005/06. Project Report. Association of Chief Police Officers, Huddersfield, UK. (Submitted)

[img]
Preview
PDF (Author version)
Download (182kB) | Preview

Abstract

A Word about Gates
Alleys (snickets, ginnels, backways) are particularly common in British industrial
cities and were originally designed to allow access to the rear of properties by
coalmen and refuse collectors. Although many alleys are no longer used for their
original purpose, they are still useful to allow residents to access the rear of their
properties without walking through their house. This can be particularly helpful when
gardening or carrying out DIY.
Alley-gating involves the installation of lockable gates across these alleys,
preventing access to the alley for those without a key. Although predominantly a
crime reduction measure, alley-gating has the potential to do more than reduce
crime; it can increase community confidence, improve the aesthetic appearance of an
area, re-invigorate schemes such as Residents’ Associations and Neighbourhood
Watch and reduce levels of worry and fear about crime and anti-social behaviour.
Although it has the potential to achieve more than crime reduction, it should be
stressed that alley-gating is a crime reduction measure, which is targeted at alleys
which are experiencing high levels of crime and anti-social behaviour, or are being
used to facilitate crime and disorder. It is not designed to limit freedom or constrain
legitimate access.
Although alley-gating does involve the installation of lockable gates, it is important
that readers do not confuse alley-gating with gated communities. Alley-gating
simply closes off the rear or side of properties for those without legitimate access. It
does not create a closed community and people can still access the rest of the
neighbourhood without using the alley. Alley-gates are rarely installed in alleys
which are currently used as through routes, and where this is the case, detailed
consideration is given towards the impact on existing users. Although gated
communities involve the use of similar security measures, they are very different.
Gated communities involve closing whole neighbourhoods to non-residents
immediately creating a ‘them’ and ‘us’. In gated communities non-residents are
excluded from large spaces which had previously been public open spaces simply
because they do not live within the community.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Monograph (Project Report)
Additional Information: © The author
Uncontrolled Keywords: alley-gating community policing
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HT Communities. Classes. Races
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
School of Human and Health Sciences > Applied Criminology Centre
Related URLs:
References:

Barclay, G.C. and Tavares, C. (eds.) (1999) Information on the Criminal Justice System
in England and Wales – Digest 4. London, Home Office.
Barr, R. and Pease, K. (1992) A Place for Every Crime and Every Crime in its Place: An
Alternative Perspective on Crime Displacement. In: D.J.Evans et al. (eds.) Crime,
Policing and Place. London, Routledge. p.196-216
Beavon, D.J.K. (1984) Crime and the Environmental Opportunity Structure: The
Influence of Street Networks on the Patterning of Property Offences. Unpublished
M.A. Thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia.
Beavon, D.J.K. et al. ( 1994) The Influence of Street Networks on the Patterning of
Property Offences. In: R.V.Clarke (ed.) Crime Prevention Studies, Volume 2. Monsey
NY, Criminal Justice Press. p. 115-148.
Bevis, C. and Nutter, J.B. (1997) Changing Street Layouts to Reduce Residential
Burglary: Paper presented to the American Society of Criminology. Atlanta.
Bowers, K., Johnson, S.D., Hirschfield, A.F.G. (2004) Closing Off Opportunities for
Crime: An Evaluation of Alley-Gating. European Journal on Criminal Policy and
Research. 10: 285-308.
Brantingham, P.L. and Brantingham, P.J. (1984) Burglar Mobility and Preventive
Planning. In: R.V. Clarke and T. Hope (eds.) Coping with Burglary: Research
Perspectives on Policy. Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff. P. 77-96.
Brown, B. and Bentley, D. (1993) Residential Burglars Judge Risk: The Role of
Territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 51-61.
Clarke, R. V. and Newman, G. (2005) Modifying Criminogenic Products: What Role for
Government. In: R. V. Clarke and G. R. Newman (eds.) Designing Out Crime from
Products and Systems. Cullompton, UK, Willan Publishing.
Cromwell, P.F. et al. (1991) Breaking and Entering: An Ethnographic Analysis of
Burglary. Newbury Park, California, Sage.
Eck, J. (1993) The Threat of Crime Displacement. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 25, pp.
527-546.
Farrington, D.P., Gottfredson, D., Sherman, L.W., and Welsh. B.C. (2002) The
Maryland Scientific Methods Scale. In: L.W. Sherman, D.P. Farrington. B.C. Welsh and
D.L. Mackenzie (Eds.) Evidence-Based Crime Prevention . New York: Routledge.Feeney, F. (1986) Robbers as Decision Makers. In: D. Cornish and R. Clarke (eds.) The
Reasoning Criminal. New York, Springer-Verlag. p. 53-71.
Flood-Page, C. and Taylor, J. (2003) Crime in England and Wales 2001/2002:
Supplementary Volume. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. London. Home Office.
Gabor, T. et al. (1987) Armed Robbery: Cops, Robbers, and Victims. Springfield, IL,
Charles C. Thomas.
Green, R. (2005) Alley Gates: To Gate or Not to Gate? Dissertation for the Advanced
Certificate in Environmental Design and Crime Prevention, Oxford Brookes University.
Hamilton-Smith, N. and Kent, A. (2005) The Prevention of Domestic Burglary. In: N.
Tilley (ed.) Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Devon, Willan
Publishing.
Hesseling, R.B.P. (1995) Displacement: A Review of the Empirical Literature. In: R.V.
Clarke (Ed.) Crime Prevention Studies 2. Monsey, NY. Criminal Justice Press.
Johnson, S.D., Bowers, K. and Hirschfield, A.F.G. (unpublished) The Effects of
Situational Crime Prevention on Residents: A Case Study of Alley-Gating.
Johnson, S. and Loxley, C. (2001) Installing Alley-Gates: Practical Lessons from
Burglary Prevention Projects. Home Office Briefing Note 2/01. London. Home Office.
Letkemann, P. (1973) Crime as Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McCreith, S. (2003) Reducing Burglary Initiative Project Summary Ladybarn.
Supplement 6 to Findings 204. London, Home Office.
McCreith, S. (2003) Reducing Burglary Initiative Project Summary Rusholme.
Supplement 7 to Findings 204. London, Home Office.
Newman, O. (1996) Creating Defensible Space. [online] Available at: <URL:
http://www.defensiblespace.com/book.htm> [Accessed 21 February 2006].
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2001) Better Places to Live by Design, HMSO.
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and the Home Office (2004) Safer Places – The
Planning System and Crime Prevention , HMSO.
Poyner, B. and Webb, B. (1991) Crime Free Housing. Oxford, Butterworth.Reed, J. and Nutley, K. (1998) Biting Back at Crime with the Alley-gaters. In: P.
Francis and P. Fraser (Eds.) Building Safer Communities. London, The Centre for
Crime and Justice Studies.
Renewal.net Case Study - Reducing Burglary: The Dukeries Gating Scheme. [online].
Available at: < URL: http://www.renewal.net/Nav.asp?Category=:crime> [Accessed
21 February 2006].
Renewal.net Solving the Problem: Alleygating. [online]. Available at: <URL:
http://www.renewal.net/Nav.asp?Category=:crime> [Accessed 21 February 2006].
Rengert, G.F. and Wasilchick, J. (2000) Suburban Burglary: A Tale of Two Suburbs –
Second Edition. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C. Thomas Publishers.
Reppetto, T.A. (1974) Residential Crime. Cambridge, MA, Ballinger.
Taylor, R. and Gottfredson, S.D. (1987) Environmental Design, Crime and Prevention:
An Examination of Community Dynamics. Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of the
Research, 8, 387-416.
Taylor, M. and Nee, C. (1988) The Role of Cues in Simulated Residential Burglary.
British Journal of Criminology, 238, 396-401.
Universities of Liverpool, Hull and Huddersfield (2002) Home Office Reducing
Burglary Initiative Final Outcome Report – Liverpool. London, Home Office.
Universities of Liverpool, Hull and Huddersfield (2005) Home Office Reducing
Burglary Initiative Case Study – Hartlepool. London, Home Office.
Wiles, P. and Costello, A. (2000) The ‘Road to Nowhere’: The Evidence for Travelling
Criminals, Home Office Research Study 207. London, Home Office.
Young, C., Hirschfield. A., Bowers, K., and Johnson. S. (2003) Evaluating Situational
Crime Prevention: The Merseyside ‘Alleygating’ Schemes. In: D. Kidner, G. Higgs and
Sean White (Eds.) Socio-Economic Applications of Geographic Information Science –
Innovations in GIS 9. London, Taylor and Francis.

Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 07 Apr 2008 13:27
Last Modified: 20 Aug 2015 07:46
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/651

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©