Blyth, Eric (2005) Assurances of past donor anonymity are meaningless. BioNews (334).
|PDF - Published Version |
Download (73kB) | Preview
The New Scientist recently recounted the story of an American teenager conceived through ostensibly anonymous donor insemination who had been able to identify his donor through DNA testing and an internet genetic database service (also see BioNews issue 333, at http://www.bionews.org.uk/new.lasso?storyid=2808).
In fact, we have known since Barry Stevens' remarkable documentary, Offspring, released in 2001, that with some genetic background information, access to DNA testing and the internet, persistence, determination - and a bit of luck - it was possible for at least some donor-conceived people to identify and locate other people to whom they were genetically related as a result of donor conception.
Popular representations of such stories risk concealing the reality for many, if not most, donor-conceived people who are unlikely to make much progress in determining the identity of their donor and may give the misleading impression that establishing paternity through DNA testing is relatively easy and straightforward.
|Subjects:||R Medicine > R Medicine (General)|
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BJ Ethics
R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
|Schools:||School of Human and Health Sciences|
School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Childhood Studies
|Depositing User:||Sara Taylor|
|Date Deposited:||07 Apr 2008 12:30|
|Last Modified:||15 Feb 2011 12:17|
Downloader CountriesMore statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only: item control page