Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Women in the driving seat: birth centre insights

Deery, Ruth, Jones, Pat and Phillips, Mari (2007) Women in the driving seat: birth centre insights. Practising Midwife, 10 (5). pp. 23-27. ISSN 1461-3123

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (339kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Birth centres seek to promote
    physiological childbirth by
    recognising, respecting and
    safeguarding normal birth processes.This
    philosophy enableswomen and their
    families to experience a positive start to
    parenthood (Kirkham2003a).Midwives are
    also able to practise ‘realmidwifery’
    (Kirkham2003b: 14). Indeed,when there is
    no risk tomother or baby, themother should
    be the personwho decideswhere her birth
    will take place (DoH2004).Astructured
    reviewof birth centres carried out byWalsh
    and Downe (2004) found that five studies
    reported benefits towomen choosing to
    birth their babies in freestanding birth
    centres.There is alsowell-documented
    evidence that home births andmidwife-led
    care are safe options forwomen (Tew1998,
    Walsh 2000, van derHulst et al 2004).

    ▼ Jump to Download Statistics
    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: Reproduced by permission of The Practising Midwife, published by © Practising Midwife
    Uncontrolled Keywords: midwifery; birth; women; birth centre;
    Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
    R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics
    R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Childhood Studies
    Related URLs:
    References:

    Burnard P (1991). ‘A method of analysing
    interview transcripts in qualitative research’.
    Nurse Education Today, 11: 461-466.
    Davies L (2004). ‘Feminist approach to midwifery
    education’ inMStewart (ed), Pregnancy, Birth
    andMaternity Care: Feminist Perspectives,
    London: Books forMidwives.
    Deery R (2003). ‘Engaging with clinical
    supervision in a community midwifery setting’.
    Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.
    Deery R (2005). ‘An action research study
    exploring midwives’ support needs and the
    effect of group clinical supervision’.Midwifery,
    21: 161-176.
    DoH (2000). The NHS Plan: a Plan for Investment,
    a Plan for Reform, London: HMSO.
    DoH (1993). Changing Childbirth, Part 1 (Report
    of the ExpertMaternity Group), London:
    HMSO.
    DoH (2004). National Service Framework for
    Children, Young People andMaternity Services,
    London: DoH publications.
    Flint C, Poulengeris P and Grant A (1989). ‘The
    “Know yourMidwife Scheme” – a randomised
    trial of continuity of care by a team of
    midwives’.Midwifery, 5 (1): 11-16.
    Hundley V A, Cruickshank FM,Milne JM,
    Glazener CMA, Lang G D, TurnerM, Blyth D
    andMollison J (1995). ‘Satisfaction and
    continuity of care: staff views of care in a
    midwife-managed delivery unit’.Midwifery, 28
    (4): 3-7.
    Hunter B (2002). ‘Emotion work in midwifery: an
    ethnographic study of the emotional work
    undertaken by a sample of student and
    qualified midwives inWales’. Unpublished PhD
    thesis, Swansea: University ofWales, Swansea.
    Hunter B (2004). ‘Conflicting ideologies as a
    source of emotion work in midwifery’.
    Midwifery, 20 (3): 261-272.
    KirkhamM(2003a). Birth Centres, a SocialModel
    forMaternity Care, Books forMidwives,
    Elsevier Science Limited.
    KirkhamM(2003b). ‘A “cycle of
    empowerment”: the enabling culture of birth
    centres’. The PractisingMidwife, 6 (11): 12-15.
    Mander R (2001). Supportive Care and
    Midwifery, Oxford: Blackwell Science.
    McCourt C et al (1998). ‘Evaluation of one-toone
    midwifery: women’s responses to care’.
    Birth, 25 (2): 73-80.
    Morgan D L and Krueger R A (1993). ‘When to
    use focus groups and why’. Advancing the
    State of the Art, 156: 3-19.
    National Childbirth Trust (2004). Birth Services in
    Mid-Sussex:What isMost Important to
    Women?, London: NCT.
    Shallow H (2003). ‘The birth centre project’, inM
    Kirkham (ed), Birth Centres: a SocialModel for
    Maternity Care, Books forMidwives, Elsevier
    Science Ltd.
    Tew M(1998). Safer Childbirth? A Critical History
    ofMaternity Care, 2nd edition, London: Free
    Association.
    van der Hulst L A M, van Teijlingen E R, Bonsel G
    K, EskesMand Bleker O P (2004). ‘Does a
    pregnant woman’s intended place of birth
    influence her attitudes toward and occurrence
    of obstetric interventions?’ Birth, 31 (1): 28-33.
    Walsh D (2000). ‘Evidence based care series 2:
    free-standing birth centres’. British Journal of
    Midwifery, 8 (6): 351-355.
    Walsh D and Downe S (2004). ‘Outcomes of
    free-standing, midwife-led birth centres: a
    structured review’. Birth, 31 (3): 222-229.
    Wilkins R (2000). ‘Poor relations: the paucity of
    the professional paradigm’, inMKirkham (ed),
    TheMidwife-Mother Relationship, London:
    Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 14 Mar 2008 09:47
    Last Modified: 05 Jan 2011 15:12
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/572

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©