Tools
Tools
Whitaker, Simon (2003) Fact, hypothesis and infallibility. Clinical Psychology (28). pp. 9-11. ISSN 1473-8279
![[img]](http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_msword.png) | Microsoft Word - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (45kB) | |
![[img]](http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
| PDF - Accepted Version Download (38kB) | Preview |
Official URL: http://www.bps.org.uk/document-download-area/docum...
Abstract
It is suggested that there is pressure on NHS
professionals, including psychologists, to
provide clear factual information. It is argued
that clinical psychologists are not on the
whole able to do this and we should state our
findings in terms of hypotheses.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Reproduced with permission from Clinical Psychology © The British Psychological Society 2003. |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Schools: | School of Human and Health Sciences School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Psychological Research School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Health and Social Care Research |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing User: | Graham Stone |
| Date Deposited: | 16 Jul 2009 10:24 |
| Last Modified: | 22 Dec 2010 16:42 |
| URI: | http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/5142 |
Item control for Repository Staff only:
| View Item |