Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

The geography of bus shelter damage: the influence of crime, neighbourhood characteristics and land-use

Newton, Andrew D. and Bowers, Kate J. (2007) The geography of bus shelter damage: the influence of crime, neighbourhood characteristics and land-use. Internet Journal of Criminology.

[img]
Preview
PDF
NewtonGeography.pdf

Download (207kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper offers unique insights into the distribution of damage to bus shelters, in a single
case study area, Merseyside (UK). The geography of bus shelter damage is examined in
relation to the criminogenic and socio-economic characteristics of its neighbourhood, and
the local land use context. The findings suggest that shelter damage is related in a known
and predictable way to known characteristics of its neighbourhood, and that shelters in
areas with high levels of anti social behaviour and violence against the person are more
susceptible to bus shelter damage. Two key factors in the occurrence of bus shelter
damage appear to be lack of capable guardianships and the presence of youths. In relation
to the influence of land use, the presence of parks, children s play areas and schools
(particularly those whose unauthorised truancy levels were above the national average)
were positively correlated with shelter damage. By contrast, negative relationships were
found between shelter damage and the presence of pubs, clubs, and off-licenses. The
implications of these findings for crime prevention are then discussed, alongside some
potential avenues for future research.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: UoA 40 (Social Work and Social Policy and Administration) Internet Journal of Criminology © 2007
Uncontrolled Keywords: bus shelter damage crime neighbourhood land use
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
School of Human and Health Sciences > Applied Criminology Centre
Related URLs:
References:

Barker, M. and Bridgeman, C. (1994), Preventing Vandalism: What Works? Police
Research Group Crime Detection and Prevention Series: Paper 56. London: Home Office.
Bowers, K.J., and Johnson, S.D. (2005). Domestic burglary repeats and space-time
clusters: the dimensions of risk. European Journal of Criminology, 2(1), 67-92.
Brace, N., Kemp, P. and Snelgar, R. (2000), SPSS for Psychologists: A Guide to Data
Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brantigham, P. and Brantingham, P. (1995), Criminality of Place: Crime Generators and
Crime Attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 5-26.
Clarke, R. (1997), (Ed), Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies. Second
Edition, New York: Harrow and Heston.
Clarke, R. (2002) The Theory of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design [online]
http://www.edoca.net/Resources/Articles/Clarke_the_theory_of_crime_prevention_through
_environmental_design.pdf [accessed 15/07/2007].
Cohen, L. and Felson, M. (1979), Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine
Activity Approach. American Sociological Review 44, 588-608.
Decker, J. F. (1972), Curbside Deterrence: An analysis of the Effect of a Slug Rejection
Device, Coin View Window and Warning Labels on Slug Usage in New York City Parking
Meters, Criminology 10(1):127 42
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR), (1998), A New Deal
for Transport: Better for Everyone. London. DETR.
Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, (DETR), (1999), Personal
Security Issues in Pedestrian Journeys. London. DETR.
Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (DTLR), (2002), Get on
Board: An Agenda for Improving Personal Security in Bus Travel. London: DTLR.
Easteal, P. and Wilson, P. (1991), Preventing Crime on Transport. Canberra: Australian
Institute of Criminology.
Geason, S. and Wilson, P. (1990), Preventing Graffiti and Vandalism. Canberra: Australian
Institute of Criminology.
Hillier, B. and Shu, S. (1998) Crime and urban layout: The need for evidence. Easingwold:
Home Office Crime Prevention College.Hirschfield, A, Bowers, K. and Brown, P., (1995), Exploring Relationships between Crime
and Disadvantage on Merseyside. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 3
(3), pp 93-112.
Hirschfield, A, and Bowers, K., (1997) The Effect of Social Cohesion on Levels of
Recorded Crime in Disadvantaged Areas. Urban Studies, 34 (8), 1275 1295.
Hirschfield A.F.G. and Bowers, K.J. (1998): Monitoring, Measuring and Mapping
Community Safety in A.Marlow and J.Pitt (eds) Planning Safer Communities, Lyme Regis:
Russell House Publishing, p.189-212.
Hough, M. (1995) Anxiety about Crime: Findings from the 1994 British Crime Survey.
Home Office Research Study 147. London: Home Office.
Levine, N., Wachs, W., and Shirazi, E. (1986), Crime at Bus Stops: A Study of
Environmental Factors. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 3 (4), 339-361.
Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (1999), Hot Spots of Bus Stop Crime: The Importance of
Environmental Attributes. Journal of the American Planning Association, 65 (4), 395-411.
Liggett, R. Loukaitou-Sideres, A., and Iseki, H. (2001), Bus Stop-Environment
Connection: Do Characteristics of the Built Environment Correlate with Bus Stop Crime?
Transportation Research Record, No. 1760, pp 20-27.
Mawby, R.I. 1977, Kiosk Vandalism: A Sheffield Study , British Journal of Criminology,
vol. 17, pp. 30-46.
Mayhew, P., Aye-Maung, N. and Mirrlees-Black, C. (1993), The 1992 British Crime
Survey. Home Office Research Study 132, London: HMSO.
Newton, A. (2004), Utilising GIS and Crime Place Principles to Examine the Nature and
Extent to Crime and Disorder on Public Transport. Unpublished PhD Thesis: The
University of Liverpool, UK.
Newton, A. (2007), Routing out the Hot Spots: Applying GIS and Crime Place Principles
to Examine Crime and Disorder on Public Transport. In Wise, S. and Kraglia, M. (Eds),
GIS and Evidence Based Policy Making. London: Taylor and Francis, pp-69-93. In press.
Pease, K. (1998). Repeat victimisation: Taking stock. Crime detection and Prevention
Series, Paper 90. Home Office: London
Sherman, L., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter,P. and Bushway, S. (Eds),
(1997), Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn t, What s Promising. [Online]
http://www.ncjrs.gov/works/ [accessed 13/08/2007].
Sutton (1987) Differential Rates of Vandalism in a New Town: Towards a Theory of Relative Place, Unpublished PhD Thesis: Lancaster.
Taylor, R. (1997), Crime and Small-Scale Places: What We Know, What We Can Prevent,
and What Else We Need to Know, in Travis, J (Ed), Crime and Place: Plenary Papers of
the 1997 Conference on Criminal Justice Research and Evaluation. Washington DC:
National Institute of Justice.
Townsley, M, Homel, R. and Chaseling, J. (2003) Infectious Burglaries: A Test of the Near
Repeat Hypothesis. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 615-633
Willaims, M. (2004), Understanding King Punisher and His Order: Vandalism in an Online
Community - Motives, Meanings and Possible Solutions, Internet Journal of Criminology
[Online] http://www.internetjournalofcriminology.com/Williams%20-
%20Understanding%20King%20Punisher%20and%20his%20Order.pdf [accessed
5/10/2007].
Wilson, P. and Healy, P. (1987), Graffiti and Vandalism in Transportation Systems. Trends
and Issues No. 6. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
Wilson, J and Kelling, G. (1982), Broken Windows. The Atlantic Monthly, 249 (3) 29-38.

Depositing User: Sara Taylor
Date Deposited: 16 Nov 2007
Last Modified: 28 Jul 2010 18:21
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/474

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©