Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Alley-gating revisited: the sustainability of resident's satisfaction

Armitage, Rachel and Smithson, Hannah (2007) Alley-gating revisited: the sustainability of resident's satisfaction. Internet Journal of Criminology.

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (228kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Alleys (snickets, ginnels, backways) are particularly common in British industrial cities
    and were originally designed to allow access to the rear of properties by coalmen and
    refuse collectors. Although alleys are still useful to allow residents access to the rear of
    their property without walking through the house, they also provide a means of entry and
    escape for offenders. Alley-gating is a crime reduction measure that involves the
    installation of a lockable gate across an alley, preventing access for anyone who does not
    have a key. This paper presents the findings of a study undertaken to examine the
    sustainability of Liverpoool s Alley-gating scheme (a robust evaluation of Liverpool s
    scheme was undertaken in 2002 see Young et al, 2003; Bowers et al, 2004). It
    specifically reports on the results of a residents survey undertaken in gated and nongated
    areas. The findings are compared with those from 2002. The results suggest that the
    positive impacts on perceptions of crime and anti-social behaviour, and experience of
    crime and anti-social behaviour have been maintained over a four year period in
    Liverpool.

    ▼ Jump to Download Statistics
    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: UoA 40 (Social Work and Social Policy and Administration) Internet Journal of Criminology © 2007
    Subjects: H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
    H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Applied Criminology Centre
    Related URLs:
    References:

    Armitage, R., Smyth, G., and Pease, K. (1999) Burnley CCTV Evaluation. In: K. Painter
    and N. Tilley (eds.) Surveillance of Public Space: CCTV, Street Lighting and Crime
    Prevention. Monsey New York: Criminal Justice Press: 225-249.
    Berry, G. and Carter, M. (1992) Assessing Crime Prevention Initiatives: The First Steps,
    Crime Prevention Unit Paper No 31. London: Home Office.
    Bowers, K., Johnson, S.D., Hirschfield, A.F.G. (2004) Closing Off Opportunities for
    Crime: An Evaluation of Alley-Gating. European Journal on Criminal Policy and
    Research, 10: 285-308.
    Brown, B. (1995) CCTV in Town Centres: Three Case Studies, Crime Detection and
    Prevention Series Paper 68. London: Home Office.
    Brown, B.B. and Altman, I. (1983) Territoriality, Defensible Space and Residential
    Burglary: An Environmental Analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3: 203-
    220.
    Brown, B. and Bentley, D. (1993) Residential Burglars Judge Risk: The Role of
    Territoriality. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13: 51-61.
    Clarke, R.V. (1992) Introduction. In: R.V. Clarke (ed.) Situational Crime Prevention
    Successful Case Studies. New York: Harrow and Heston: 3-36.
    Clarke, R.V (Ed.) (1997) Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies (2nd ed.).
    Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press.
    Clarke, R. V. and Newman, G. (2005) Modifying Criminogenic Products: What Role for
    Government. In: R. V. Clarke and G. R. Newman (eds.) Designing Out Crime from
    Products and Systems. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing: 7-83.
    Felson, M. (1998) Crime and Everyday Life, Second Edition. California: Pine-Forge
    Press.
    Felson, M. and Clarke, R.V. (1998) Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical Theory for
    Crime Prevention, Police Research Paper 98. London: Home Office.
    Flood-Page, C. and Taylor, J. (2003) Crime in England and Wales 2001/2002:
    Supplementary Volume. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. London: Home Office.
    Garland, D. (1996) Limits of the Sovereign State: Strategies of Crime Control in
    Contemporary Societies. British Journal of Criminology, 36: 445-471. Hamilton-Smith, N. and Kent, A. (2005) The Prevention of Domestic Burglary. In: N.
    Tilley (ed.) Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety. Devon: Willan
    Publishing.
    Johnson, S. and Loxley, C. (2001) Installing Alley-Gates: Practical Lessons from
    Burglary Prevention Projects. Home Office Briefing Note 2/01. London: Home Office.
    Mayhew, P., Clarke, R.V.G., Sturman, A. and Hough, J.M. (1976) Crime as Opportunity,
    Home Office Research Study No. 34. London: Home Office.
    McCreith, S. (2003) Reducing Burglary Initiative Project Summary Ladybarn.
    Supplement 6 to Findings 204. London: Home Office.
    Reed, J. and Nutley, K. (1998) Biting Back at Crime with the Alley-gaters. In: P. Francis
    and P. Fraser (Eds.) Building Safer Communities. London: The Centre for Crime and
    Justice Studies.
    Renewal.net Case Study - Reducing Burglary: The Dukeries Gating Scheme. [online].
    Available at: < URL: http://www.renewal.net/Nav.asp?Category=:crime> [Accessed 21
    February 2006].
    Renewal.net Solving the Problem: Alley-gating. [online]. Available at: <URL:
    http://www.renewal.net/Nav.asp?Category=:crime> [Accessed 21 February 2006].
    Smithson, H., Armitage, R., and Rogerson, M. (2007) Evaluating the Sustainability of
    Alley-gating in Liverpool. Report submitted to Liverpool CitySafe.
    Sutton, M. (1998) Handling Stolen Goods and Theft: A Market Reduction Approach.
    Home Office Research Study 178. Home Office. London.
    Sutton, M., Schneider, J.L. and Hetherington, (2001) Tackling theft with the market
    reduction approach. Home Office Crime Reduction Research Series Paper 8.
    Tilley, N. (1993) Understanding Car Parks, Crime and CCTV: Evaluation Lessons from
    Safer Cities, Crime Prevention Series Paper 42. London: Home Office.
    Universities of Liverpool, Hull and Huddersfield (2002) Home Office Reducing Burglary
    Initiative Final Outcome Report Liverpool. London: Home Office.
    Universities of Liverpool, Hull and Huddersfield (2005) Home Office Reducing Burglary
    Initiative Case Study Hartlepool. London: Home Office.
    Webb, B. and Laycock, G. (1992) Reducing crime on the London Underground. London:
    Home Office.Young, C., Hirschfield. A., Bowers, K., and Johnson. S. (2003) Evaluating Situational
    Crime Prevention: The Merseyside Alley-gating Schemes. In: D. Kidner, G. Higgs and
    Sean White (Eds.) Socio-Economic Applications of Geographic Information Science
    Innovations in GIS 9. London: Taylor and Francis. 37-50.

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 19 Oct 2007
    Last Modified: 22 Oct 2010 10:24
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/455

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©