Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation

Fawcett, Barbara and Hearn, Jeff (2004) Researching others: epistemology, experience, standpoints and participation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7 (3). pp. 201-218. ISSN 1364-5579

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (160kB)

    Abstract

    This article examines the possibility and challenges of carrying out research, especially
    qualitative and ethnographically-orientated research, into areas such as gender, disability,
    ethnicity and racialization, without the researcher having direct experience of those specific
    social divisions and oppressions. Discussion of these questions is framed by four differential
    understandings of the concept of ‘otherness’ and linked with debates in the areas of research
    methodology, epistemology, ontology and research practices. Issues of experience,
    ‘standpoint’ and participation are specifically focused on. The resulting discussion leads
    to the conclusion that in ‘researching others’ attention has to be paid to historical context
    and to the maintenance of a critical relation to the research topic. A sustaining focus on the
    self-reflexivity of the researcher as author and the continual interrogation of the social bases
    of knowledge, together with a detail understanding of political agendas, are also important.
    In paying attention to these aspects of research, materialism and critical discourse analysis
    are to be seen as part of the same broad socio-political project rather than as opposing and
    mutually exclusive perspectives.

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: © 2004 Taylor & Francis Ltd
    Uncontrolled Keywords: researching epistemology social research
    Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
    H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Childhood Studies
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Research in the Social Sciences
    Related URLs:
    References:

    Barbour, R. S. (1999) The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services
    research. Journal of Health Service Research Policy, 4(1), 39 – 43.
    Baistow, K. (1994) Liberation and regulation: some paradoxes of empowerment. Critical Social Policy,
    42, 34 – 46.
    Barnes, C. and Mercer, G. (1997) (eds) Doing Disability Research (Leeds: The Disability Press).
    Beauvoir, S. de (1949/1953) The Second Sex (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
    Beresford, P. and Trevillion, S. (1995) Developing Skills for Community Care: A Collaborative Approach
    (Aldershot: Arena).Brannen, J. (ed.) (1993) Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research (Aldershot: Avebury).
    Bryman, A. (1992) Quantity and Quality in Social Research (London: Routledge).
    Cain,M. and Finch, J. (1981) Towards a rehabilitation of data. In P. Abrams, R. Deem, J. Finch and P.
    Rock (eds) Practice and Progress: British Sociology 1950-1980 (London: Allen & Unwin).
    Calhoun, C. (1995) Critical Social Theory (Oxford: Blackwell).
    Connerton, P. (ed.) (1980) Critical Sociology (Harmondsworth: Penguin).
    Davis, J. M. (2000) Disability studies as ethnographic research and text: research strategies and roles for
    promoting social change? Disability and Society, 15(2), 191 – 206.
    Eichler, M. (1988) Non-Sexist Research Methods: A Practical Guide (Winchester, Massachusetts:
    Unwin).
    Fawcett, B. (2000) Feminist Perspectives on Disability (London: Longman).
    Flax, J. (1992) The end of innocence. In J. Butler and J. Scott (eds) Feminists Theorize the Political
    (London: Routledge).
    Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
    Hanmer, J. and Hearn, J. (1999) Gender and welfare research. In F. Williams, J. Popay and A. Oakley
    (eds) Welfare Research: A Critical Review (London: UCL Press), pp. 106 – 130.
    Harding, S. (1987) Is there a feminist method? In S. Harding (ed.) Feminism and Methodology: Social
    Science Issues (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
    Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women’s Lives (Milton Keynes:
    Open University Press).
    Harding, S. (1998) Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialism, Feminism and Epistemologies (Indianapolis:
    Indiana University Press).
    Harding, S. and Narayan, U. (eds) (1998a) Border crossings: multicultural and postcolonial feminist
    challenges to philosophy 1. Special issue of Hypatia, 13(1).
    Harding, S. and Narayan, U. (eds) (1998b) Border crossings: multicultural and postcolonial feminist
    challenges to philosophy 2. Special issue of Hypatia, 13(2).
    Hartsock, N. (1996) Postmodernism and political change: issues for feminist theory. In S. J. Hekman
    (ed.) Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault (Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University
    Press).
    Hartsock, N. (1998) The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays (Boulder: Westview).
    Haug, F. (1987 ) Female Sexualization: a Collective Work of Memory (London: Verso).
    Hearn, J. (1998a) Theorizing men and men’s theorizing: men’s discursive practices in theorizing men.
    Theory and Society, 27(6), 781 – 816.
    Hearn, J. (1998b) The Violences of Men. How Men Talk About and How Agencies Respond to Men’s
    Violence to Women (Sage: London).
    Hill Collins, P. (1989) The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women in
    Culture and Society, 14(4), 745 – 773.
    Hill Collins P. (1991) Black Feminist Thought (New York: Routledge).
    Humphries, B. (1996) (ed.) Critical Perspectives on Empowerment (Birmingham: Venture Press).
    Kelly, L., Burton, S. and Regan, L. (1994) Researching women’s lives or studying women’s oppression?
    Reflections on what constitutes feminist research. In M. Maynard and J. Purvis (eds) Researching
    Women’s Lives from a Feminist Perspective (London: Taylor & Francis).
    Kitzinger, C. and Wilkinson, S. (1996) Theorizing representing the other. In S. Wilkinson and C.
    Kitzinger (eds) Representing the Other (London: Sage).
    Luka´cs, G. (1971) History and Class Consciousness (London: Merlin).
    MacKinnon, C.A. (1982) Feminism, Marxism, feminism and the state: an agenda for theory. Signs,
    7(3), 515 – 544.
    Mason, J. (1996) Qualitative Researching (London: Sage).
    May, T. (1997) Social Research: Issues, Methods and Process (Buckingham: Open University Press).
    May, T. (1998) Reflexivity in the age of reconstructive social science. International Journal of Social
    Research Methodology, 1(1), 7 – 24.
    May, T. (1999) Reflexivity and sociological practice. Sociological Research Online, 4(3). Available online
    at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/4/3/may.html.
    May, T. (2000) Reflexivity in social life and sociological practice—a rejoinder to Roger Slack.
    Sociological Research Online, 5(1). Available online at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/1/
    may.html Maynard, M. (1994) Methods, practice and epistemology: the debate about feminism and research. In
    M. Maynard and J. Purvis (eds) Researching Women’s Lives from a Feminst Persepctive (London:
    Taylor & Francis).
    Moore, M., Beazley, S. and Maelzer, J. (1998) Researching Disability Issues (Buckingham, Open
    University Press).
    Morris, J. (1997) ‘Us and them?’ Feminist research and community care. In J. Bornat, J. Johnson, C.
    Pereira, D. Pilgrim and F. Williams (eds) Community Care: A Reader, second edition
    (Basingstoke: Macmillan in Association with the Open University).
    Narayan, U. and Harding, S. (eds) (2000) Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural,
    Postcolonial, and Feminist World (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
    Oliver, M. (1996) Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice (Basingstoke: Macmillan).
    Opie, A. (1992) Qualitative research, appropriation of the ‘other’ and empowerment. Feminist Review,
    40/42, 52 – 62.
    Outhwaite, W. (1975) Understanding Social Life: theMethod called Verstehen (London: Allen and Unwin).
    Pease, B. (1996) Reforming men: masculine subjectivities and the politics of and practices of
    profeminism. Doctoral Thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora.
    Pease, B. (1999) Recreating Men: Postmodern Masculinity Politics (London: Sage).
    Pease, B. (2000) Researching profeminist men’s narratives: participatory methodologies in a
    postmodern frame. In B. Fawcett, B. Featherstone, J. Fook and A. Rossiter (eds) Researching
    and Practising in Social Work: Postmodern Feminist Perspectives (London: Routledge).
    Potter, G. (2000) The Philosophy of Social Science: New Perspectives (Harlow: Prentice Hall).
    Priestley, M. (1997) Who’s research? A personal audit. In C. Barnes and G. Mercer (eds) Doing
    Disability Research (Leeds: The Disability Press).
    Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. (1998a) Eplilogue. In J. Ribbens and R. Edwards (eds) Feminist Dilemmas
    in Qualitative Research (London: Sage).
    Ribbens, J. and Edwards, R. (eds) (1998b) Feminist Dilemmas in Qualitative Research (London: Sage).
    Robson, C. (1993) Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner Researchers
    (Oxford: Blackwell).
    Shakespeare, T. (1994) Cultural representations of disabled people: dustbins for disavowal? Disability
    and Society, 9(3), 283 – 299.
    Shakespeare, T. (1997) Rules of engagement: changing disability research. In L. Barton and M. Oliver
    (eds) Disability Studies: Past, Present and Future (Leeds: The Disability Press).
    Smith, D. (1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: a Feminist Sociology of Knowledge (USA:
    Northwestern University Press).
    Stanley, L. and Wise, S. (1983 ) Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research (London:
    Routledge and Kegan Paul).
    Stanley, L. and Wise, S. (1993) Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology, second
    edition (London: Routledge).
    Stone, E. and Priestley, M. (1996) Parasites, pawn and partners: disability research and the role of nondisabled
    researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 699 – 716.
    Touraine, A. (1977) The Voice and the Eye: an Analysis of Social Movements (Cambridge: Cambridge
    University Press).
    Trinder, L. (2000) Reading the texts: postmodern feminism and the ‘doing of research’. In B. Fawcett,
    B. Featherstone, J. Fook and A. Rossiter (eds) Researching and Practising in Social Work:
    Postmodern Feminists Perspectives (London: Routledge).
    Wendell, S. (1996) The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability (London:
    Routledge).
    Williams, F. (1996) Postmodernism, feminism and the question of difference. In N. Parton (ed.) Social
    Theory, Social Change and Social Work (London: Routledge).
    Williams, M. and May, T. (1996) Introduction to the Philosophy of Social Research (London: UCL
    Press).
    Wilkinson, S and Kitzinger, C. (ed.) (1996) Representing the Other (London: Sage).
    Wolf, D. (ed.) (1996a) Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork (Boulder: Westview).
    Wolf, D. (1996b) Situating feminist dilemmas in fieldwork. In D. Wolf (ed.) Feminist Dilemmas in
    Fieldwork (Boulder: Westview).

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 12 Oct 2007
    Last Modified: 17 Dec 2010 12:16
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/440

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©