Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

The effects of company risk, founders' characteristics and corporate governance on executive incentive schemes in UK initial public offerings

Allcock, Deborah and Filatotchev, Igor (2007) The effects of company risk, founders' characteristics and corporate governance on executive incentive schemes in UK initial public offerings. Working Paper. Financial Ethics and Governance Research Group, Huddersfield, UK. (Submitted)

WarningThere is a more recent version of this item available.
[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (250kB) | Preview

Abstract

Combining the agency perspective, resource-based view and upper echelon research, this paper examines factors affecting the implementation of equity based incentive schemes in initial public offerings (IPOs). In line with agency research, the probability of equity-based incentives is negatively associated with the IPO firm’s riskiness. The paper shows that performance-related incentive schemes are negatively associated with share ownership and board power of the IPO’s founding directors. Large-block share ownership is positively associated with the probability of conditional incentive schemes. However, board independence and non-executive directors’ interests do not have any effects on “toughness” of executive compensation. The paper suggests a number of avenues for a future analysis of governance development process in “threshold” firms.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Monograph (Working Paper)
Additional Information: UoA 35 (Accounting and Finance) Note: a revised version of this paper has been accepted for publication in the Journal of Management (http://jom.sagepub.com/) Copyright The Authors 2007
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
Schools: The Business School
The Business School > Financial Ethics and Governance Research Group
Related URLs:
References:

Association of British Insurers. 2002. Executive compensation and share based remuneration:
Guidelines for share incentive schemes. London: ABI.
Baker, M., & Gompers, P. A. 2003. The determinants of board structure at the initial public
offering. Journal of Law and Economics, 46(2): 569-598.
Balkin, D. B., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1990. Matching compensation and organizational strategies.
Strategic Management Journal, 1(2): 153-169.
Barkema, H., Geroski, P., & Schwalbach, J. 1997. Managerial compensation, strategy and firm
performance: An introduction. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 15(4): 413-
416.
Baysinger, B., & Hoskisson, R. E. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic
control: effects on corporate strategy. Academy of Management Review, 15(1): 72-87.
Beatty, R. P., & Zajac, E. J. 1994. Managerial incentives, monitoring and risk bearing: a study of
executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings.
Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2): 313-335.
Brennan, M. J., & Franks, J. 1997. Underpricing, ownership and control in initial public offerings
of equity securities in the U.K. Journal of Financial Economics, 45(3): 391-413.
Cannella, A. A., Frasier, D. R., & Lee, S. 1995. Firm failure and managerial labor markets:
Evidence from Texas banking. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2): 185-210.
Carpenter, M. A. 2002. The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between
top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal,
23: 275-284.
Carpenter, M. A., Pollock, T. G., & Leary, M. M. 2003. Testing a model of reasoned risk-taking:
Governance, the experience of principals and agents, and global strategy in high-technology
IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 24(9): 803-820.
35
Carpenter, M. A., & Westphal , J. D. 2001. The Strategic Context of External Network Ties:
Examining the Impact of Director Appointments on Board Involvement in Strategic
Decision-making. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 639-660.
Certo, S. T. 2003. Influencing initial public offering investors with prestige: Signaling with board
structures. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 432-446.
Certo, S. T., Covin, J. G., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 2001. Wealth and the effects of founder
management among IPO-stage new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7): 641-
658.
Certo, S. T., Daily, C. M., Cannella, A. A., & Dalton, D. R. 2003. Giving money to get money:
How CEO stock options and CEO equity enhance IPO valuations. The Academy of
Management Journal, 46(5): 643-664.
Combined Code on Corporate Governance (The). 2006. London: Financial Reporting Council.
Conyon, M., & Leech, D. 1994. Top pay, company performance, and corporate governance. Oxford
bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56(3): 229-247.
Conyon, M. J., & Peck, S. I. 1998. Board control, remuneration committees and top management
compensation. The Academy of Management Journal, 41: 146-157.
Conyon, M. J., Peck, S. I., Read, L., & Sadler, G. V. 2000. The structure of executive
compensation contracts: UK evidence. Long Range Planning, 33(4): 478-503.
Conyon, M. J., Peck, S. I., & Sadler, G. 2000. Econometric modelling of UK executive
compensation. Managerial Finance, 26(9): 3-20.
Conyon, M. J., & Sadler, G. V. 2001. CEO compensation, option incentives, and information
disclosure. Review of Financial Economics, 10(3): 251-277.
Coughlan, A. T., & Schmidt, R. M. 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm
performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3): 43-
66.
36
Cyr, L., Johnson, D., & Welbourne, T. 2000. Human resources in initial public offering firms: Do
venture capitalists make a difference? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(1): 77-91.
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 1992. Financial performance of founder-managed versus
professionally managed small corporations. Journal of Small Business Management, 2: 25-
34.
Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. 1997. CEO and board chair roles held jointly or separately: Much
ado about nothing? Academy of Management Executive, 11(3): 11-20.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue
and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3): 371-382.
Daily, C. M., Johnson, J. L., & Dalton, D. R. 1999. On the Measurements of Board Composition:
Poor Consistency and a Serious Mismatch of Theory and Operationalization. Decision
Sciences, 30: 83-106.
Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Roengpitya, R. 2003. Meta-analysis of financial
performance and equity: fusion or confusion? . Academy of Management Journal, 46(1): 13-
26.
David, P., Kochhar, R., & Levitas, E. 1998. The effect of institutional investors on the level and
mix of CEO compensation. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(2): 200-208.
Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. 2002. Understanding the Dynamics of New
Venture Top Management Teams: Cohesion, Conflict, and New Venture Performance.
Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4): 365-386.
Espenlaub, S., & Tonks, I. 1998. Post IPO directors' sales and reissuing activity: an empirical test
of IPO signalling models. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 25(9-10): 1037-
1079.
Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy,
88(8): 288-307.
37
Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and
Economics, 26: 301-325.
Filatotchev, I. 2006. Effects of executive characteristics and venture capital involvement on board
composition and share ownership in IPO firms. British Journal of Management, 17(1): 75-92.
Filatotchev, I., & Bishop, K. 2002. Board composition, share ownership and 'underpricing' of U.K.
IPO firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10): 941-955.
Filatotchev, I., Jackson, G., Gospel, H., & Allcock, D. 2007. Identifying the key drivers of 'good'
corporate governance and the appropriateness of policy responses. London: Department of
Trade and Industry.
Filatotchev, I., Toms, S., & Wright, M. 2006. The firm’s strategic dynamics and corporate
governance life-cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4): 256-279.
Finkle, T. 1998. The relationship between boards of directors and initial public offerngs in the
biotechnology industry. Entrepreneurship, Theory and Practice, 22(3): 5-30.
Gillian, S. L., & Starks, L. T. 2000. Corporate governance proposals and shareholder activism: the
role of institutional investors. Journal of Financial Economics, 57(2): 275-305.
Gilson, S. C. 1989. Management turnover and financial distress. Journal of Financial Economics,
25(2): 241-262.
Golden, B. R., & Zajac, E. J. 2001. When will boards influence strategy? inclination × power =
strategic change. Strategic Management Journal, 22(12): 1087-1111.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Balkin, D. B. 1992. Compensation, organizational strategy, and firm
performance. Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western Publishing Co.
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Welbourne, T. M. 1988. Compensation strategy: An overview and future
steps. Human Resource Planning, 11(3): 173-189.
Gray, S. R., & Cannella, A. A. 1997. The role of risk in executive compensation. Journal of
Management, 23(4): 517-540.
38
Greenbury, S. R. 1995. Director's remuneration report of a study group chaired by Sir Richard
Greenbury (Greenbury Report). London: Gee Publishing Ltd.
Gregg, P., Machin, S., & Symanski, S. 1993. The disappearing relationship between directors pay
and corporate performance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 31(1): 1-9.
Gujarati, D. N. 2003. Basic Econometrics (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. 1999. Cooperative or Controlling? The Effects of CEO-Board Relations
and the Content of Interlocks on the Formation of Joint Ventures. Administrative Science
Quarterly, 44: 473-506.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis (5th
ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Hambrick, D., & Jackson, E. 2000. Outside Directors with Stake: The Linchpin in Improving
Governance. California Management Review, 42(4): 108-127.
Hampel, R. 1998a. Committee on corporate governance: final report (Hampel Committee Report).
London: Gee Publishing.
Hampel, R. 1998b. Committee on corporate governance: the combined code. London: Gee
Publishing.
Holmstrom, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1): 74-91.
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., & Grossman, W. 2002. Conflicting voices: The
effects of institutional ownership heterogenity and internal governance on corporate
innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4): 697-716.
Jain, B. A., & Kini, O. 1999. The lifecycle of initial public offering firms. Journal of Business,
Finance and Accounting, 26(9 & 10): 1281-1317.
Jayraman, N., Khorana, A., & Nelling, E. 2000. CEO founder status and firm financial
performance. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 1215-1224.
39
Jensen, M., & Murphy, K. J. 1990. Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of
Political Economy, 98(2): 225-264.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and
ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
London Stock Exchange. 2002. A Practical Guide to Listing. London: London Stock Exchange plc.
Main, B. G. M., Bruce, A., & Buck, T. 1996. Total board remuneration and company performance.
The Economic Journal, 106(439): 1627-1644.
McBain, M. L., & Krause, D. S. 1989. Going public the impact of insider's holdings on the price of
initial public offering. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(6): 419-428.
McNulty, T., & Pettigrew, A. 1999. Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20(1): 47-74.
Mello, A. S., & Parsons, J. E. 1998. Going public and the ownership structure of the firm. Journal
of Financial Economics, 49(1): 79-109.
Michaely, R., & Shaw, W. H. 1994. The pricing of initial public offerings: the test of adverseselection
and signaling theories. Review of Financial Studies, 7(2): 279-319.
Mikkelson, W. H., Partch, M. M., & Shah, K. 1997. Ownership and operating performance of
companies that go public. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(3): 281-316.
Murphy, K. 1985. Corporate performance and managerial remuneration: An empirical study.
Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3): 11-42.
Pagano, M., Panetta, F., & Zingales, L. 1998. Why do companies go public? An empirical
analysis. Journal of Finance, 53(1): 27-64.
Pagano, M., & Röell, A. 1998. The choice of stock ownership structure: Agency costs, monitoring,
and the decision to go public. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113: 187-225.
Pettigrew, A., & McNulty , T. 1995. Power and influence in and around the boardroom. Human
Relations, 48: 845- 873.
40
Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its
environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2): 218-228.
Pham, P., Kalev, P., & Steen, A. 2003. Underpricing, stock allocation, ownership structure and post
listing liquidity of newly listed firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27: 919-947.
Pye, A. 2001. A Study in Studying Corporate Boards Over Time: Looking Backwards to Move
Forwards. British Journal of Management, 12: 33-45.
Rappaport, A. 1981. Selecting strategies that create shareholder value. Harvard Business Review,
60(3): 139-149.
Rappaport, A. 1999. New thinking on how to link executive pay with performance. Harvard
Business Review, 77(2): 91-101.
Rediker, K., & Seth, A. 1995. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance
mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 85-99.
Ritter, J. R. 1987. The costs of going public. Journal of Financial Economics, 19(2): 269-281.
Sanders, W. G., & Boivie, S. 2004. Sorting things out: Valuation of new firms in uncertain
markets. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2): 167-186.
Sapienza, H. J., & Gupta, A. K. 1994. Impact of agency risks and task uncertainty on venture
capitalist-CEO interaction Academy of Management Journal, 37(6): 1618-1632.
Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M., & Dino, R. 2003. Exploring the agency consequences of ownership
dispersion among the directors of private family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 46:
217-229.
Shivdasani, A., & Yermack, D. 1999. CEO Involvement in the selection of new board members:
An empirical analysis. Journal of Finance, 54(5): 1829 -1853.
Steier, L., & Greenwood, R. 2000. Entrepreneurship and the evolution of angel financial networks.
Organization Studies, 21(1): 163-192.
The Directors' Remuneration Report Regulations. 2002. SI 2002/1986: 1-27. London: HMSO.
41
Walsh, J. P., & Steward, J. K. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control
mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3): 421-458.
Westphal, J. D. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom: Behavioral and performance consequences
of CEO board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 7-24.
Westphal, J. D., & Zajac, E. J. 1995. Who shall govern? CEO board power, demographic similarity
and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1): 60-83.
Zahra, S., & Pearce, J. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review
and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2): 291-272.

Depositing User: Users 4 not found.
Date Deposited: 03 Oct 2007
Last Modified: 24 Aug 2015 01:43
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/415

Available Versions of this Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©