Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Collateral damage: men's domestic violence to women seen through men's relations with men

Hearn, Jeff and Whitehead, Antony (2006) Collateral damage: men's domestic violence to women seen through men's relations with men. Probation Journal, 53 (1). pp. 38-56. ISSN 0264-5505

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (159kB)


    This article examines ‘domestic’ violence through a focus on men, masculinity/masculinities and men’s violence to known women. More specifically it analyses the implications of masculinity for policies and practices aimed at reducing violence and the risk of violence by men against known women, including programmes run by the Probation Service. On the basis of research rooted and tested in probation practice, it argues that masculinity is generated through relations between men, and that ‘domestic’ violence may be a means of regulating those relations. Thus, addressing relations between men is likely to be critical to the effectiveness of relevant programmes

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: CUoA 41 (Sociology) opyright © 2006 NAPO
    Subjects: H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman
    H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Applied Criminology Centre
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Research in the Social Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Childhood Studies
    Related URLs:

    Brantingham, P. & Faust, F. (1976) ‘A Conceptual Model of Crime Prevention’, in
    Crime and Delinquency 22(3): 284–96.
    British Crime Survey (2001) Research Development and Statistics Directorate. Home
    Office Statistical Bulletin 18/01. London: Home Office.
    Burn, D., Boyle, J., Copsey, M., Dominelli, L., Lambert, J., Smallridge, M.,
    Whitehead, V. & Willis, S. (1990) ‘Offending and Masculinity: Working with
    Males’, Probation Journal 37 (3): 106–11.
    Campbell, A. (1993) Out of Control: Men, Women and Aggression. London:
    Carrigan, T., Connell, R.W. & Lee, J. (1985) ‘Towards a New Sociology of
    Masculinity’, Theory and Society 14 (5): 551–604.
    Cobbe, F.P. (1992) ‘Wife Torture in England’, in Radford, J. and Russell, D.E.H. (eds)
    Femicide: The Politics of Women Killing, pp. 46–52. Buckingham: Open University
    Cockburn, C.K. (1983) Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change.
    London: Pluto.
    Connell, R.W. (1995) Masculinities. Cambridge: Polity.
    Dankwort, J. (1992–93) ‘Violence against Women: Varying Perceptions and
    Intervention Practices with Woman Abusers’, Intervention (Quebec) 92: 34–49.
    DeKeseredy, W.S. (1990) ‘Male Peer Support and Woman Abuse: The Current State
    of Knowledge’, Sociological Focus 23: 129–39.
    DeKeseredy, W.S. & Schwartz, M.D. (2002) ‘Theorizing Public Housing Woman Abuse as a Function of Economic Exclusion and Male Peer Support’, Women’s
    Health and Urban Life 1: 26–45.
    DeKeseredy, W.S. & Schwartz, M.D. (2005) ‘Masculinities and Interpersonal
    Violence’, in Kimmel, M., Hearn, J. and Connell, R.W. (eds) Handbook of Studies
    on Men and Masculinities, pp. 353–66. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    Dutton, D.G., Starzomski, A. & Ryan, L. (1996) ‘Antecedents of Abuse Personality
    and Abusive Behavior in Wife Assaulters’, Journal of Family Violence 11 (2):
    Dworkin, A. (1981) Pornography: Men possessing Women. London: Women’s Press.
    Edwards, S.S.M. (1989) Policing ‘Domestic’ Violence. London: Sage.
    Edwards, S.S.M. (1996) Sex and Gender in the Legal Process. London: Blackstone
    Edwards, S.S.M. & Hearn, J. (2005) Working Against Men’s ‘Domestic Violence’:
    Priority Policies and Practices for Men in Intervention, Prevention and Societal
    Change. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
    Eisenstein, Z.R. (1979) ‘Developing a Theory of Capitalist Patriarchy’, in Eisenstein,
    Z.R. (ed.) Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, pp. 5–55. New
    York: Monthly Review Press.
    Eley, S. (2005) ‘Changing Practices: The Specialised Domestic Violence Court
    Process’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 44 (2): 113–24.
    Eriksson, M., Hester, M., Keskinen, S. & Pringle, K. (eds) (2005) Tackling Men’s
    Violence in Families: Nordic Issues and Dilemmas. Bristol: Policy Press.
    Festinger, L. (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
    Firestone, S. (1971) The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution. London:
    Jonathan Cape.
    Gadd, D. (2004) ‘Evidence-led Policy or Policy-led Evidence? Cognitive Behavioural
    Programmes for Men who are Violent towards Women’, Criminal Justice 4 (2):
    Gondolf, E.W. (1985) Men Who Batter: An Integrated Approach for Stopping Wife
    Abuse. Holmes, Beach, FL: Learning Publications.
    Gondolf, E.W. & Heckert, D.A. (2003) ‘Determinants of Women’s Perceptions of Risk
    in Battering Relationships’, Violence and Victims 18 (4): 371–86.
    Hearn, J. (1987) The Gender of Oppression: Men, Masculinity and the Critique of
    Marxism. Brighton: Wheatsheaf and New York: St. Martin’s Press.
    Hearn, J. (1992) Men in the Public Eye: The Construction and Deconstruction of Public
    Men and Public Patriarchies. London and New York: Routledge.
    Hearn, J. (1998a) ‘Men will be Men: The Ambiguity of Men’s Support for Men who
    have been Violent to Known Women’, in Popay, J., Hearn, J. and Edwards, J. (eds)
    Men, Gender Divisions and Welfare, pp. 147–80. London: Routledge.
    Hearn, J. (1998b) The Violences of Men: How Men Talk About and How Agencies
    Respond to Men’s Violence to Women. London: Sage.
    Hearn, J. (2001) ‘Men, Social Work and Men’s Violence to Women’, in Christie, A.
    (ed.) Men and Social Work, pp. 63–86. London: Macmillan.
    Hearn, J. (2002) ‘Men’s Violences to Women, Gendered Power and ‘Non-violent’
    Institutions’, in Eriksson, M., Nenola, A. and Muhonen Nilsen, M. (eds) Gender
    and Violence in the Nordic Countries, pp. 335–54. Copenhagen: The Nordic
    Council of Ministers’ series. TemaNord. URL (accessed January 2006): http://www.
    Hearn, J. & Pringle, K. (2006) ‘Men, Masculinities and Children: Some European Heasley, R. (2005) ‘Queer Masculinities of Straight Men’, Men and Masculinities
    7 (3): 310–20.
    Heckert, D.A. & Gondolf, E.W. (2004) ‘Battered Women’s Perceptions of Risk versus
    Risk Factors and Instruments’, Journal of Interpersonal Violence 19 (7): 778–800.
    Heiskanen, M. & Piispa, M. (1998) Faith, Hope, Battering. A Survey of Men’s
    Violence against Women in Finland. Helsinki: Statistics Finland/Council for Equality
    between Women and Men.
    HMSO (2002) Justice for All, White Paper, Cm. 5563, July, 2002. URL (accessed
    January 2006):, p. 131.
    Home Office (2003) Criminal Statistics, England and Wales. London: Home Office.
    Howell, D. & Willis, R. (eds) (1990) Societies at Peace. New York: Routledge.
    Jones, M. (2004) ‘A Fight About Nothing’: Constructions of Domestic Violence.
    Unpublished PhD thesis. Adelaide: University of Adelaide.
    Kelly, L. (1999) Domestic Violence Matters: An Evaluation of a Development Project.
    Home Office Research Study No. 193. London: Home Office.
    Kelly, L. & Radford, J. (1996) ‘Nothing Really Happened: The Invalidation of
    Women’s Experiences of Sexual Violence’, in Hester, M., Kelly, L. and Radford, J.
    (eds) Women, Violence and Male Power: Feminist Activism, Research and Practice,
    pp. 19–33. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    Kimmel, M. (2002a) ‘“Gender Symmetry” in Domestic Violence: A Substantive and
    Methodological Research Review’, Violence against Women 8(1): 1332–63.
    Kimmel, M. (2002b) ‘Global Masculinities: Restoration and Resistance’, in Pease, R.
    and Pringle, K. (eds) A Man’s World: Changing Men’s Practices in a Globalized
    World, pp. 21–37. London: Zed.
    Leonard, P. & McLeod, E. (1980) Marital Violence: Social Construction and Social
    Service Response. Coventry: University of Warwick.
    Lévi-Strauss, C. (1949) The Elementary Structure of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon.
    Lévi-Strauss, C. (1970) The Raw and the Cooked. London: Jonathan Cape.
    Lipman-Blumen, J. (1976) ‘Toward a Homosocial Theory of Sex Roles: An Explanation
    of the Sex Segregation of Social Institutions’, in Blaxall, M. and Reagan, B. (eds)
    Women and the Workplace. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    Lopez-Claros, A. & Zahidi, S. (2005) Women’s Empowerment: Measuring the Global
    Gender Gap. Geneva: World Economic Forum. URL (accessed January 2006):
    Lundgren, E., Heimer, G., Westerstrand, J. & Kalliokoski, A.-M. (2001) Captured
    Queen: Men’s Violence against Women in ‘Equal’ Sweden – A Prevalence Study.
    Stockholm: Fritzes Offentliga Publikationer.
    McGuire, J. (2002) ‘Integrating Findings from Research Reviews’, in J. McGuire (ed.)
    Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective Programmes and Policies to
    Reduce Re-offending, pp. 3–38. Chichester: Wiley.
    Maynard, M. (1985) ‘The Response of Social Workers to Domestic Violence’, in Pahl,
    J. (ed.) Private Violence and Public Policy, pp. 125–41. London: Routledge.
    Messerschmidt, J.W. (1993) Masculinities and Crime: Critique and
    Reconceptualisation of Theory. Latham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
    Mirrlees-Black, C. (1994) Estimating the Extent of Domestic Violence: Findings from
    the 1992 BCS. Home Office Research Bulletin No. 37. London: Home Office
    Research and Statistics Department.
    Mooney, J. (1993) The Hidden Figure: Domestic Violence in North London. London:
    Islington Council. Mooney, J. (1994) The Prevalence and Social Distribution of Domestic Violence: An
    Analysis of Theory and Method. Unpublished PhD thesis. London: Middlesex
    Mullender, A. (1997) Rethinking Domestic Violence: The Social Work and Probation
    Response. London: Routledge.
    Pence, E. & Paymar, M. (1990) Power and Control Tactics of Men who Batter. Duluth,
    MN: Minnesota Program Development.
    Remy, J. (1990) ‘Patriarchy and Fratriarchy as Forms of Androcracy’, in Hearn, J. and
    Morgan, D. (eds) Men, Masculinities, and Social Theory, pp. 43–54. London:
    Unwin Hyman/Routledge.
    Rubin, G. (1975) ‘The Traffic in Women: Notes on the “Political Economy” of Sex’,
    in Reiter, R.R. (ed.) Toward an Anthropology of Women, pp. 157–210. New York:
    Monthly Review Press.
    Senior, P. & Woodhill, D. (eds) (1992) Gender, Crime and Probation Practice.
    Sheffield: PAVIC Publications.
    Stanko, E., Crisp, D., Hale, C. & Lucraft, H. (1998) Counting the Costs: Estimating
    the Impact of Domestic Violence in the London Borough of Hackney. Swindon:
    Crime Concern.
    Tallberg, T. (2003) Networks, Organisations and Men: Concepts and Interrelations.
    Working Paper No. 495. Helsinki: Swedish School of Economics and Business
    Administration. URL (accessed January 2006):
    Theleweit, K. (1987) Male Fantasies. Volume One. Cambridge: Polity.
    UNICEF (2000) Domestic Violence against Women and Girls. Innocenti Digest No 6.
    Florence: UNICEF.
    Walby, S. & Allen, J. (2004) Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings
    from the British Crime Survey. Home Office Research Study 276. London: Home
    Office. URL (accessed January 2006):
    Walby, S. & Myhill, A. (2000) ‘Reducing Domestic Violence . . . What Works?
    Assessing and Managing the Risk of Domestic Violence’, Policing & Reducing
    Crime, Crime Reduction Research Series, Briefing Note, pp. 307–33. London:
    Home Office.
    Walby, S. & Myhill, A. (2001) ‘Assessing and Managing Risk’, in Taylor-Browne, J.
    (ed.) What Works in Reducing Domestic Violence? London: Whiting and Birch.
    Whitehead, A. (1995) Men and Offending: 1A3 Probation Service Programme
    Manual. Sheffield: South Yorkshire Probation Service.
    Whitehead, A. (2000) Rethinking Masculinity: A Critical Examination of the Dynamics
    of Masculinity in the Context of an English Prison. Unpublished PhD thesis.
    Southampton: University of Southampton.
    Whitehead, A. (2005) ‘Man to Man Violence: How Masculinity May Work as a
    Dynamic Risk Factor’, in The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 44 (4): 411–22.

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 10 Sep 2007
    Last Modified: 17 Dec 2010 11:56


    Downloads per month over past year

    Repository Staff Only: item control page

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©