Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

‘Now nobody falls through the net’: practitioners’ perspectives on the Gold Standards Framework for community palliative care

King, Nigel, Thomas, Keri, Martin, Nina, Bell, Dennise and Farrell, Sharon (2005) ‘Now nobody falls through the net’: practitioners’ perspectives on the Gold Standards Framework for community palliative care. Palliative Medicine, 19 (8). pp. 619-627. ISSN 0269-2163

[img] PDF
Restricted to Registered users only

Download (244kB)

    Abstract

    The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) seeks to facilitate consistent and high quality community palliative care through a set of guidelines, mechanisms and assessment tools. The present study set out to examine practitioners’ perspectives on the GSF during its first national roll-out. Two general practices that had adopted the GSF were recruited in each of four geographical areas, and each matched as closely as possible with a non-GSF practice. Sixty-eight semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out with general practitioners and district nurses in 16 selected practices, along with the GSF facilitator and up to four other ‘stakeholders’ in each area. Analysis revealed that the majority of GSF participants felt that the framework had strengthened their provision of community palliative care. In particular, communication within primary health care teams and co-ordination of services improved, aspects which were better in the GSF practices than in the matched non-GSF practices. Practitioners felt there was more consistency of care, with a reduced likelihood that individual patients would ‘slip through the net’. The most common areas of concern were in relation to the workload associated with the role of the GSF co-ordinator. Implications for the development and effective implementation of the framework and for further research are discussed

    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: © 2005 SAGE Publications
    Uncontrolled Keywords: community palliative care • qualitative • standards
    Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
    R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Psychological Research
    Related URLs:
    References:

    NICE. Guidance on cancer services: improving supportive and palliative care for adults with cancer. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence , 2004.
    Thomas K. The Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care . Eur J Palliat Care 2003; 10: 113-115 .
    Thorpe G. Enabling more dying people to remain at home . BMJ 1993; 307: 915-918 .[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    Barclay S, Rogers M, Todd C. Communication between GPs and cooperatives is poor for terminally ill patients . BMJ 1997; 315: 1235-1236 .[Free Full Text]
    Thomas K. Out-of-hours palliative care in the community: continuing care for the dying at home. London: Macmillan Cancer Relief , 2001.
    King N, Thomas K, Bell D. An out-of-hours protocol for community palliative care: practitioners’ perspectives . Int J Palliat Nurs 2003; 9: 277-282 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    Arksey H, Jackson K, Wallace Aet al. Access to health care for carers: barriers and interventions. Report for the National Co-Ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D. NCCSDO, 2004.
    Thomas K. Caring for the dying at home: companions on the journey. Abingdon, Oxon: Radcliffe Medical Press , 2003.
    Ellershaw J, Wilkinson S eds. Care of the dying: a pathway to excellence. Corby, Northants: Oxford University Press , 2003.
    Madill A, Jordan A, Shirley C. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructivist epistemologies . Br J Psychol 2000; 91: 1-20 .
    Willig C. Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method. Buckingham: Open University Press , 2001.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage , 1994.
    Nadin S, Cassell C. Using data matrices. In Cassell C, Symon G eds. Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research. London: Sage , 2004.
    King N, Bell D, Martin N, Farrell S. Gold Standards Framework, phase 2: qualitative case study evaluation - final report. Primary Care Research Group, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield , 2003.
    Williams A, Sibbald B. Changing roles and identities in primary health care: exploring a culture of uncertainty . J Adv Nurs 1999; 29: 737-745 .[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
    Murphy E, Dingwall R, Greatbatch D, Parker S, Watson P. Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature . Health Technol Assess 1998; 12: 16-16 .
    House of Commons Select Committee on Health. Report on palliative care. London: HMSO , 2004.

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 23 Aug 2007
    Last Modified: 22 Dec 2010 12:32
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/359

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©