Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Success for All in England: Results From the Third Year of a National Evaluation

Tracey, Louise, Chambers, Bette, Slavin, Robert, Hanley, Pam and Cheung, Alan (2014) Success for All in England: Results From the Third Year of a National Evaluation. Sage Open, 4 (3). ISSN 2158-2440

[img]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (339kB) | Preview

Abstract

This article reports the third-year findings of a longitudinal evaluation in England of Success for All (SFA), a comprehensive literacy program. Eighteen SFA schools across England and 18 control schools, matched on prior achievement and demographics, were included in this quasi-experimental study. The results of hierarchical linear modeling analysis reveal a statistically significant positive school-level effect for SFA schools compared with control schools on standardized reading measures of word-level and decoding skills, and there were directionally positive but nonsignificant school-level effects on measures of comprehension and fluency. Practical and policy implications of these findings are discussed, particularly as they relate to recent English government policies encouraging schools to implement research-proven approaches.

▼ Jump to Download Statistics
Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: quasi-experiment, longitudinal evaluation, whole-school reform, literacy instruction, cooperative learning
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB1501 Primary Education
Schools: School of Education and Professional Development
Related URLs:
References:

Allen, G. (2011). Early intervention: Smart investment, massive
savings (Independent review on early intervention delivery).
London, England: Cabinet Office.
Borman, G. D., Hewes, G. M., Overman, L. T., & Brown, S. (2003).
Comprehensive school reform and achievement: A metaanalysis.
Review of Educational Research, 73, 125-230.
Borman, G. D., Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Chamberlain, A.,
Madden, N. A., & Chambers, B. (2007). Final reading outcomes
of the national randomized field trial of Success for All.
American Educational Research Journal, 44, 701-731.
Cook, T. D., & Payne, M. R. (2002). Objecting to the objections
to using random assignment in educational research.
In F. Mosteller & R. F. Boruch (Eds.), Evidence matters:
Randomized trials in education research. Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution, 150-178.
Department for Children, Schools and Families. (2009). Analysis
and evidence strategy 2009-10: Delivering evidence based
policy. London, England: Author.
Department for Education and Skills. (2007). Letters and sounds:
Principles and practice of high quality phonics six-phase
teaching programme. London, England: Author.
Department for Work and Pensions. (2009). Households below
average income: An analysis of the income distribution
1994/95–2007/08. London, England: Author. Retrieved from
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/householdsbelow-
average-income-hbai–2
Duncan, G. J., & Murnane, R. J. (Eds.). (2011). Whither opportunity?
Rising inequality, schools, and children’s life chances.
New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The
British Picture Vocabulary Scale (2nd ed.). London, England:
GL Assessment.
Goodman, A., Sibieta, L., & Washbrook, E. (2009). Inequalities
in educational outcomes among children aged 3 to 16: Final
report for the National Equality Panel. London, England:
Institute for Fiscal Studies.
Hanselman, P., & Borman, G. D. (2013). The impacts of Success
for All on reading achievement in grades 3–5: Does intervening
during the later elementary grades produce the same benefits
as intervening early? Educational Evaluation and Policy
Analysis, 35, 237-251.
Hills, J., Brewer, M., Jenkins, S., Lister, R., Lupton, R., Machin, S.,
& Riddell, S. (2010). An anatomy of economic inequality in the
UK: Report of the National Equality Panel. London, England:
Government Equalities Office.
Hopkins, D., Youngman, M., Harris, A., & Wordsworth, J. (1999).
Evaluation of the initial effects and implementation of Success
for All in England. Journal of Research in Reading, 22,
257-270.
Law, Y. K. (2008). Effects of cooperative learning on second graders’
learning from text. Educational Psychology: An International
Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 28, 567-582.
Lee, V. E., & Burkham, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting
gate: Social background differences in achievement as children
begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Lesnick, J., George, R., Smithgall, C., & Gwynne, J. (2010).
Reading on grade level in third grade: How is it related to high
school performance and college enrollment? Baltimore, MD:
Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Mongon, D., & Chapman, C. (2008). Successful leadership for
promoting the achievement of white working class pupils.
Nottingham, UK: National College of School Leadership.
Retrieved from www.nationalcollege.org.uk/index/docinfo.
htm?id=17406
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An
evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature
on reading and its implications for reading instruction.
Rockville, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human
Development.
Peurach, D. J., & Glazer, J. L. (2012). Reconsidering replication:
New perspectives on large-scale school improvement. Journal
of Educational Change, 13, 155-190.
Quint, J. C., Balu, R., DeLaurentis, M., Rappaport, S., Smith, T. J.,
& Zhu, P. (2013). The Success for All model of school reform:
Early findings from the investing in innovation (i3) scale-up.
MDRC. Retrieved from http://www.mdrc.org/publication/success-
all-model-school-reform
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models
(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y., & Congdon, R. T.
(2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling.
Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading.
London, England: Department of Education and Skills.
Rowan, B., Camburn, E., & Barnes, C. (2004). Benefiting from
comprehensive school reform: A review of research on
CSR implementation. In C. Cross (Ed.), Putting the pieces
together: Lessons from comprehensive school reform research.
Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive
School Reform, 1-52.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and
practice (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (2009a). Cooperative learning. In G. McCulloch &
D. Crook (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education.
Abington, UK: Routledge, 177-183.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S.
(2009b). Effective reading programs for the elementary grades:
A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research,
79, 1391-1465.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Davis, S., & Madden, N. A. (2011).
Effective programs for struggling readers: A best-evidence
synthesis. Educational Research Review, 6, 1-26.
Slavin, R. E., Madden, N. A., Chambers, B., & Haxby, B. (2009c).
Two million children: Success for All. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Corwin Press.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing
reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC:
Committee on the Prevention of Reading Difficulties in Young
Children, National Research Council.
Stevens, R. J. (2003). Student Team Reading and Writing: A cooperative
learning approach to middle school literacy instruction.
Educational Research and Evaluation, 9, 137-160.
Strand, S. (2008). Minority ethnic pupils in the Longitudinal Study
of Young People in England: Extension report on performance
in public examinations at age 16 (DCSF Research Report
029). London, England: Department for Children, Schools and
Families. Retrieved from www.education.gov.uk/research/
data/uploadfiles/dcsf-rr029.pdf
Sylva, K., Melhuish, E. C., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., &
Taggart, B. (2004). The Effective Provision of Pre-School
Education (EPPE) project (Technical Paper 12—The Final
Report: Effective Pre-School Education). London, England:
Department for Education and Skills, Institute of Education,
University of London.
Tymms, P., & Merrell, C. (2001). Success for All quantitative
evaluation report: Second year. Durham, UK: Curriculum
Evaluation and Management Centre, Durham University.
Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2010). The spirit level: Why more
equal societies almost always do better. London, England:
Penguin Books.
Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-
Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.

Depositing User: Pam Hanley
Date Deposited: 27 Jul 2016 15:15
Last Modified: 02 Dec 2016 08:48
URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/29075

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Repository Staff Only: item control page

View Item View Item

University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©