Swuste, Paul, Van Gulijk, Coen, Zwaard, Walter, Lemkowitz, Saul, Oostendorp, Yvette and Groeneweg, Jop (2016) Developments in the safety science domain, in the fields of general and safety management between 1970 and 1979, the year of the near disaster on Three Mile Island, a literature review. Safety Science, 86. pp. 10-26. ISSN 0925-7535
Restricted to Repository staff only
Objective: What influence has research conducted by general management schools and safety research had
upon the causes of accidents and disasters in relation to the managing of safety between 1970 and 1979?
Method: The study was confined to original articles and documents, written in English or Dutch from the
period under consideration. For the Netherlands, the professional journal De Veiligheid (Safety) was consulted.
Results and conclusions: Dominant management approaches started with (1) classical management starting
from the 19th century incorporating as a main component scientific management from the early 20th century.
The interwar period saw the rise of (2) behavioural management which was based on behaviourism,
this was followed by (3) quantitative management from the Second World War onwards. After the war it
was (4) modern management that became important. A company was seen as an open system, interacting
with an external environment with external stakeholders. These management schools of thought were not
exclusive, but existed side by side in the period under consideration.
Early in the 20th century, it was the U.S. ‘Safety First’ movement that marked the starting point of this
knowledge development in the sphere of safety managing, with cost reduction and production efficiency
as the key drivers. Psychological models and metaphors were used to explain accidents resulting from
‘unsafe acts’. Safety was managed by training and targeting reckless workers, all in line with scientific
management. Supported by behavioural management, this approach remained dominant for many years
until long after World War II.
Influenced by quantitative management, potential and actual disasters occurring after the war led to two
approaches; loss prevention (up-scaling in the process industry) and reliability engineering (inherently
dangerous processes in the aerospace and nuclear sectors). The distinction between process safety and
occupational safety became clear after the war when the two evolved as relatively independent domains.
In occupational safety in the 1970s human error was thought to be symptomatic of mismanagement. The
term ‘safety management’ was introduced to scientific safety literature alongside concepts such as loosely
and tightly coupled processes, organizational culture, disaster incubation and the notion of mechanisms
blinding organizations to portents of disaster scenarios. Loss prevention remained technically oriented.
Until 1979 there was no clear link with safety management. Reliability engineering that was based on systems
theory did have such a connection with the MORT technique that served as a management audit. The
Netherlands mainly followed Anglo-Saxon developments. In the late 1970s, following international safety
symposia in The Hague and Delft, independent research finally began in the Netherlands.
|Uncontrolled Keywords:||Safety, History, Three-Miles Island, Safety Management|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD61 Risk Management
T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
|Schools:||School of Computing and Engineering
School of Computing and Engineering > Institute of Railway Research
|Depositing User:||Coen Van Gulijk|
|Date Deposited:||17 May 2016 15:20|
|Last Modified:||17 May 2016 18:38|
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only: item control page