Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery

McIntosh, Caroline and Thomson, C.E. (2006) Honey dressing versus paraffin tulle gras following toenail surgery. Journal of wound care, 15 (3). pp. 133-136. ISSN 0969-0700

[img]
Preview
PDF
Download (93kB) | Preview

    Abstract

    Objective: Anecdotal reports suggest that certain honey dressings have a positive effect on wound
    healing. However, there is limited empirical evidence supporting its use. This double-blind randomised
    controlled trial investigated the effect of a honey dressing on wound healing following toenail surgery
    with matrix phenolisation.

    Method: Participants (n=100) were randomly assigned to receive either an active manuka honey
    dressing (n=52) or paraffi n-impregnated tulle gras (n=48). The primary outcome was time (days) taken
    for complete re-epithelialisation of the nail bed.

    Results: Mean healing times were 40.30 days (SD 18.21) for the honey group and 39.98 days
    (SD 25.42) for the paraffi n tulle gras group. Partial avulsion wounds healed statistically signifi cantly faster
    (p=0.01) with paraffi n tulle gras (19.62 days, SD 9.31) than with the honey dressing (31.76 days, SD 18.8),
    but no signifi cant difference (p=0.21) was found following total avulsion when comparing honey (45.28
    days, SD 18.03.) with paraffi n tulle gras dressings (52.03 days, SD 21.3).

    Conclusion: The results suggest that patients may benefi t more from paraffi n tulle gras dressings than
    honey dressings following partial toenail avulsion. No statistically signifi cant difference was found for
    healing times after total toenail avulsion, although the marginal benefit of the honey dressing on these
    healing times warrants further investigation.

    Declaration of interest: None.

    ▼ Jump to Download Statistics
    Item Type: Article
    Additional Information: Reproduced by permission of Journal of Wound Care, published by Journal of Wound Care. © Journal of Wound Care
    Uncontrolled Keywords: honey dressings; randomised controlled trial; toenail surgery; wound healing
    Subjects: R Medicine > RT Nursing
    R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
    R Medicine > RD Surgery
    Schools: School of Human and Health Sciences
    References:

    1 Molan, P., Betts, J. Using
    honey dressings: the
    practical considerations.
    Nurs Times 2000; 96: 49,
    36-37.
    2 Molan, P. Treatment of
    wounds and burns with
    honey. Current
    Therapeutics 2001; 42: 9,
    33-39.
    3 Marshall, C. The use of
    honey in wound care: a
    review article. Br J Pod
    2002; 5: 2, 47-49.
    4 Molan, P. The role of
    honey in the management
    of wounds. J Wound Care
    1999; 8: 415-418.
    5 Thomson, C.E., Paterson-
    Brown, S., Russell, I.T.,
    Russell, D. A clinical and
    economical evaluation of
    toenail surgery performed
    by podiatrists in the
    community and surgeons in
    the hospital setting: a
    randomised controlled trial,
    2002. Conference
    proceedings of the 1st
    International Allied Health
    Professions: Impacting on
    World Health, Edinburgh.
    6 King, B. Pain at fi rst
    dressing change after
    toenail avulsion: the
    experience of nurses,
    patients and an observer: 1
    J Wound Care 2003; 12: 1:
    5-10.
    7 Subrahmanyam, M. Honey
    impregnated gauze versus
    polyurethane fi lm (Opsite)
    in the treatment of burns; a
    prospective randomised
    study. Br J Sur 1993; 46: 4,
    322-323.
    8 Subrahmanyam, M. A
    prospective randomised
    clinical and histological
    study of superfi cial burn
    wound healing with honey
    and silver sulfadiazine.
    Burns 1998; 24: 2: 157-161.
    9 Al-Waili, N.S., Saloom,
    K.Y. Effects of topical
    honey on post-operative
    wound infections due to
    Gram positive and Gram
    negative bacteria following
    caesarean section and
    hysterectomies. Eur J Med
    Res 1999; 4: 3, 126-130.
    10 Subrahmanyam, M.
    Honey dressing versus
    boiled potato peel in the
    treatment of burns: a
    prospective randomised
    study. Burns 1996; 22: 6,
    491-493.
    11 Subrahmanyam, M.
    Honey-impregnated gauze
    versus amniotic membrane
    in the treatment of burns.
    Burns 1994; 20: 331-333.
    12 Frankel, S., Robinson, G.,
    Berenbaum, M.R.
    Antioxidant capacity and
    correlated characteristics
    of 14 unifl oral honeys. J
    Apicultural Research 1998;
    37: 1, 27-31.
    13 Cooper, R.A., Molan,
    P.C. Honey in wound care. J
    Wound Care 1999; 8: 7,
    340.
    14 Moore, O.A., Smith, L.A.
    Campbell, F. et al.
    Systematic review of the
    use of honey as a wound
    dressing. BMC Compliment
    Altern Med 2001; 2: 1-8.
    15 Marshall, C., Queen, J.,
    Manjooran, J. Honey vs.
    povidone iodine following
    toenail surgery. Wounds
    UK 2005; 1: 1, 10-18.
    16 Subrahmanyam, M.
    Topical application of honey
    in treatment of burns. Br J
    Surg 1991; 78: 497-498.
    17 Subrahmanyam, M. Early
    tangential excision and skin
    grafting of moderate burns
    is superior to honey
    dressing: a prospective
    randomised trial. Burns
    1999; 25: 6, 729-731.
    18 Schwarzentraub, P.H.,
    Raymond, G.A., Ball, M.J.,
    Bizzoco, D.L. Foot ulcers: a
    54-month retrospective
    study. J Foot Surg 1991; 30:
    5, 437-442.

    Depositing User: Sara Taylor
    Date Deposited: 05 Apr 2007
    Last Modified: 28 Jul 2010 19:19
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/164

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©