Search:
Computing and Library Services - delivering an inspiring information environment

Web 2.0 and its impact on pedagogy: radical or reined in?

Bennett, Liz (2012) Web 2.0 and its impact on pedagogy: radical or reined in? In: British Educational Research Association Annual Conference), 4-6 September 2012, Manchester, Uk. (Unpublished)

[img] Microsoft PowerPoint
Download (2379kB)

    Abstract

    This paper is based on a small scale study set in the north of England in a post ‘92 university. It explores lecturers’ practice in relation to their use of web 2.0 tools in their teaching. (Web 2.0 tools are web tools that allow participation and collaboration.) The study uses phenomenological principles to examine lecturers’ lived experience and to draw meaning from that experience (Taylor, 2008). There are several new pedagogies of online learning, for instance participatory learning, connectivism, learning 2.0, emergent learning that have been made possible or encouraged through the affordances of new technologies. This paper explores the extent to which these new pedagogies are visible in practice. These models of learning have some common features; all make use of the possibilities of technology to connect with other people, to build a learning community and to contribute to discussions through online participation. All place emphasis on the role of the learner as the agent in the learning process. As such they fall within Sfard’s participation metaphor of learning (rather than learning as acquisition of knowledge) (Sfard 1998). Epistemologically they locate knowledge as being fluid and participatory. Hence the focus is on learning how to do things, and how to learn with other people rather than about transmission of knowledge from the institution to the learner. Indeed there is a blurring of the distinction between teacher and learners, between knowledge makers and knowledge users
    Land and Bayne in their study of students’ experiences of wiki technologies noted that how the radical potential of the medium was curtailed or ‘reined in’ by both lecturers and students, challenging effects of new media formations “to control and constrain them within more orthodox understanding of authorship, assessment, collaboration and formal learning” (2008 p.678). This paper evidences and analyses the ways that the radical aspects of the web are harnessed and curtailed through the pedagogic process.

    ▼ Jump to Download Statistics
    Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
    Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > LB2300 Higher Education
    Schools: School of Education and Professional Development
    School of Education and Professional Development > Centre of Lifelong Learning and Social Justice
    School of Education and Professional Development > Centre of Lifelong Learning and Social Justice > Teaching, Public Pedagogies and Professionalism Research Group
    School of Education and Professional Development > Centre of Lifelong Learning and Social Justice > Technology Enhanced Learning Research Group
    Related URLs:
    References:

    Bradwell, P. (2009). The Edgeless University - Why Higher Education must embrace technology: Demos.
    Clegg, S., McManus, M., Smith, K., & Todd, M. J. (2006). Self-development in Support of Innovative Pedagogies: Peer support using email. International Journal for Academic Development, 11(2), 91 -100.
    Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2008). Ubiquitous Learning: An Agenda for Educational Transformation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 6th Networked Learning, Greece.
    Cormier, D. (2008). Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 4(5).
    Crook, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape – opportunities, challenges and tensions: Becta.
    Downes, S. (2006). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge.
    Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A Framework for Research and Practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
    Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (2004). Research on network learning:an overview. In P. Goodyear, S. Banks, V. Hodgson & D. McConnell (Eds.), Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Jephcote, M., & Salisbury, J. (2009). Further education teachers' accounts of their professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(7), 966-972.
    Kennedy, D., & Lefevre, D. (2009). Epigeum: Learning Technologies Online. In T. Anderson (Ed.), Internet Based Collaborative Technologies
    Kop, R. (2010). Networked Learning and Connectivity: Social Media, the Knowledgable other and Distance Learning University of Wales, Cardiff.
    Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovation (Third ed.). London: Free Press.
    Siemens, G. (2004). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved 24 March 2012, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
    Weller, M. (2011). A pedagogy of abundance. Spanish Journal of Pedagogy, 249, 223–236.
    Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Wiley, D. (2008). Openness and the Disaggregated Future of Higher Education. Retrieved 10 March 2012, from www.slideshare.net/opencontent/openness-and-the-disaggregated-future-of-higher-education-presentation
    Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent Learning and Learning Ecologies in Web 2.0. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(3), 1-21.

    Depositing User: Elizabeth Bennett
    Date Deposited: 12 Dec 2012 11:09
    Last Modified: 06 Aug 2013 10:36
    URI: http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/16310

    Document Downloads

    Downloader Countries

    More statistics for this item...

    Item control for Repository Staff only:

    View Item

    University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH Copyright and Disclaimer All rights reserved ©