Hyland, Philip and Boduszek, Daniel (2012) A Unitary or Binary Model of Emotions: A Discussion on a Fundamental Difference between Cognitive Therapy and Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. Journal of Humanistics and Social Sciences, 1 (1). pp. 49-61. ISSN 2009-4612
This is the latest version of this item.
- Published Version
This primary purpose of this paper is to consider the differential cognitive conceptualization of emotions postulated by the two main schools of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), namely Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy (REBT) and Cognitive Therapy (CT).While CT theory favours a unitary model of emotional distress, REBT theory posits a binary model of emotional distress. This paper will address how the two approaches differ in their conceptualizations of emotional disturbance and the implications such differences have on clinical, theoretical, and research practice in both psychotherapy and psychology. A review of the relevant empirical literature will be presented with a recommendation for how future research can better investigate the differing predictions made by REBT and CT theory, respectively.
|Subjects:||B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
|Schools:||School of Human and Health Sciences > Centre for Applied Psychological Research
School of Human and Health Sciences
|Depositing User:||Daniel Boduszek|
|Date Deposited:||07 Nov 2012 12:24|
|Last Modified:||04 Sep 2015 21:29|
Available Versions of this Item
A Unitary or Binary Model of Emotions: A Discussion on a Fundamental Difference between Cognitive Therapy and Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. (deposited UNSPECIFIED)
- A Unitary or Binary Model of Emotions: A Discussion on a Fundamental Difference between Cognitive Therapy and Rational Emotive Behaviour Therapy. (deposited 07 Nov 2012 12:24) [Currently Displayed]
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only: item control page